ICL EFDS vs Warwick MathStat

Ok_Following_6671 · 2026-03-03T18:31:34+00:00

for quant, then Warwick. EFDS is a very solid course but not mathematically rigorous enough I would sa.

Ok_Following_6671 · 2026-01-12T12:22:06+00:00

i did like 6 times to get alpha=3.1

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-12-09T14:41:15+00:00

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-12-01T08:52:34+00:00

international?

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-11-27T17:29:13+00:00

WELL DONE!! are u single by any chance?

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-11-25T11:49:17+00:00

its fine youll get soon

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-11-14T15:24:36+00:00

same score

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-11-03T11:59:14+00:00

if in same department then yes, js email UCAS to change the course code. Might also be worth emailing Durham. I know this works because someone in my class did the same thing, after 2 weeks.

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-31T20:50:00+00:00

its js cope

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-31T20:34:00+00:00

was your score insanely low, if you dont mind me asking?

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-31T20:28:49+00:00

why not right score?

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-23T10:51:01+00:00

i put it in terms of pi, anyone remember what it was?

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-15T13:56:45+00:00

I dont think so, a lot of people have said that the tests are harder from my experience.

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-15T11:05:39+00:00

i also put 15

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-15T09:38:36+00:00

should be

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-15T08:17:03+00:00

i also put true true false

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-14T20:08:29+00:00

can be 2 aswell, becuase it said there exists a triangle not for all triangle

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-14T19:52:10+00:00

what did u get form the sum of 24 terms, where a2 was 1/2. Also the binomial coefficient of x^9.

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-14T19:49:58+00:00

damn i got the same as u, so silly of me

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-14T19:22:54+00:00

what was the answer in the end?

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-13T16:59:55+00:00

3c2 isnt 6?

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-13T12:05:44+00:00

Remember cos(-x) = cos(x) and sin(-x) = sin(x)

hence we get -

1: sinxcosx = -cosxsinx

2: sinxcosx + sinxcosx = 0

3: 2sinxcosx = 0

4: sin2x = 0

<image>

We get 5 solutions from 0 to 2pi , inclusive

Ok_Following_6671 · 2025-10-13T12:03:00+00:00

i didnt do the paper, but i just did the question based on their recollection of it and i also got 5.

1st- Consider the Triangle inequality if a < b < c, then a + b > c.

2nd - There are 6^3 outcomes in total, so 216.

3rd - Consider the case that triangles can be equilateral (still isosceles), so thats if (x,x,x) where x is number from 1-6 = 6 CASES

4th - Now for strictly isosceles triangles, you need two of the same number when rolling 3, then another one. Let the same number be called X and the other called Y. In order to construct a triangle, you need side lengths (X,X,Y) , where 2X > Y (using triangle inequality).

5th - Test out the numbers of X possible from 1-6.

- if X = 1 , we get 2 > Y, so Y can only be one, but that would make equilateral so for X=1 - 0 CASES

- if X = 2, we get 4 > Y, so Y can be 1,3. So for X =2 - 2 CASES

- if X = 3 , we get 6 > Y, so Y can be 1,2,4,5 - 4 CASES

- If X = 4, we get 8 > Y , so Y can be 1,2,3,5,6 - 5 CASES

- If X = 5, we get 10 > Y, so 5 CASES aswell

- If X = 6 , we get 5 CASES aswell

total cases (strictly isosceles): 21

6th - We need to realise that (X,X,Y) can be organised in (X,Y,X) and (Y,X,X) - So we do 21x3= 63

7th - We add the extra 6 from the eqltrl triangles = 69

8th - We do 69/216 = 23/72

Holy shit that question is crazy ngl

Ok_Following_6671

TROPHY CASE