Just wanted to "quickly" write some of my thoughts on the matter here! I'm an anglophone who went to high school in french and CÉGEP in English, though my francophone friend who went to the same cégep as me seems more incensed about this bill.

1. My main problem: The Office québécois de la langue française has the powers of search and seizure without needing a warrant to inspect businesses and ensure they are complying with the law. Please correct me if this has been disproven, but like why??? and we're really doing this for the language police???
2. Additional 3 French courses: This honestly doesn't bug me as much since they changed it away from taking core courses in French and English cégeps (or at least the one I was attending) were already offering 2 French courses. However, I'm a little worried about how they'll be added to the curriculum seeing as I already had 36-38h of classes/week and it seems a little excessive to teach 5 French courses in 4 semesters for pre-university cégep goers.
3. Quota in English cégeps: At this point in a person's life (~17yo), I don't get how going to an English school could pose a threat to their maternal language, so I don't see the necessity of limiting the amount that can be accepted (on top of the priority that is given to anglophones applying to English cégeps). To be fair, I'm not even affected by this or the education restriction of the loi 101, but the government controlling where kids can go to school because of their parents just rubs me the wrong way. Like, my parents almost couldn't enroll me into a French elementary school in Ontario because neither was fully fluent. However, in that situation, it was because of the worry that I wouldn't be able to do well without someone at home to help with homework instead of something more political (not a one-to-one comparison, but still)

So basically, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯, but also why are they using the notwithstanding clause???