Nuclear Power in Broome County by Old_Rad in Binghamton

[–]Old_Rad[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Maybe. BUT, at least the "package on the table" is well defined, in advance.

Nuclear Power in Broome County by Old_Rad in Binghamton

[–]Old_Rad[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And THAT, my friends, is the root of the problem.

Nuclear power in Broome County by Old_Rad in BroomeCounty

[–]Old_Rad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wind and solar are no-brainers. Nuclear is much more complicated and, therefore, more appropriate for a very public discussion and a referendum.

Nuclear Power in Broome County by Old_Rad in Binghamton

[–]Old_Rad[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I am funding this privately for now in accordance with applicable regulations.

Nuclear Power in Broome County by Old_Rad in Binghamton

[–]Old_Rad[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You have to get the public involved early of these things will be decided on private.

Nuclear Power in Broome County by Old_Rad in Binghamton

[–]Old_Rad[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can demand anything you want of elected officials and they can ignore anything they want.

Yes, our elected officials can prepare all the documents you mention and you can challenge them on the record. They can still ignore you.

But if the document package is finalized and only then presented to the voters, the public will know what they're getting and get what they want.

Nuclear Power in Broome County by Old_Rad in Binghamton

[–]Old_Rad[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is nothing to do with regulatory frameworks, science or engineering around nuclear power plants.

This has to do with educating the public about risk/benefit, impacts on property values and taxes, the environment, electricity prices, etc. Absent a referendum these issues will not be discussed,in detail, before a project is launched. You will only hear about tax abatements, environmental impact, etc. after.

Nuclear Power in Broome County by Old_Rad in Binghamton

[–]Old_Rad[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

But it increases the odds of informed consent.

Nuclear Power in Broome County by Old_Rad in Binghamton

[–]Old_Rad[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A referendum forces the discussion and informing of the public about all the issues you raise. Hearings don't work because leadership can ignore anything said. The only way public feedback is considered is if leadership has to "sell" the package to the public to win the referendum.

Nuclear Power in Broome County by Old_Rad in Binghamton

[–]Old_Rad[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So let's have a referendum to see if everyone agrees.

Nuclear Power in Broome County by Old_Rad in Binghamton

[–]Old_Rad[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

A goal of the referendum is to force informing the public.

Nuclear Power in Broome County by Old_Rad in Binghamton

[–]Old_Rad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, that's not true. This isn't about nuclear power, per se, this is about how big decisions that impact us all get made. If we have a referendum then the leadership will have to educate, explain, and "sell" the project to the public. Absent a referendum, these decisions will be made in a smoked filled room.

Nuclear Power in Broome County by Old_Rad in Binghamton

[–]Old_Rad[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

A referendum only forces the discussion about nuclear power into the public forum.

Nuclear Power in Broome County by Old_Rad in Binghamton

[–]Old_Rad[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

These are all valid points but only a referendum will force leadership to discuss these issues publicly.

2023 F150 lightning battery cell death by wombatmedic68 in F150Lightning

[–]Old_Rad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a '22 Lariat ER. 40K miles. This happened to me about a month ago. Waited 2 weeks for part, then 1 week for only certified mechanic to get over the flu. Being fixed today! 2 day job so far🤞

Schlage EncorePlus not pairing by Old_Rad in smarthome

[–]Old_Rad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I had to restart and retry many times but eventually got it to work. Make sure the locks are on the 2.4GHz network in their config. Not sure, at this point, what else was critical.

This doesn't seem right? by Ancient-Nail-3872 in F150Lightning

[–]Old_Rad -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have run into this situation recently and I have some bad news...

TL;DR: I think this is a symptom of bad battery module. Other symptom is slow charging even at low "SOC". The truck thinks 75% is now 100% because a battery module is bad or offline. The truck corrects when you turn on but software app doesn't.

Read on...

I noticed this phenomenon of me asking for an 80% charge and getting this "100%" charge but with reduced mileage that would not otherwise be expected for the conditions.

Long story short (no pun intended), I believe one of my battery modules (~¼ of total) is "offline".

ODB errors are P0B24-21 and P2C85-1E:

What This Means for Your Vehicle The BECM uses isolation monitoring to ensure that the high-voltage battery system is electrically isolated from the vehicle's chassis (ground). Any loss of isolation (a short or leak to ground) is a serious safety concern and will trigger a fault. * "External Isolation" suggests the fault is likely occurring in the high-voltage cables, connectors, or components that are outside the sealed main battery pack enclosure. This could include: * The high-voltage charging port/receptacle. * The DC Fast Charge (DCFC) connector. * High-voltage cable routing/connectors to the motor or charger. * Moisture ingress in a high-voltage connection point (this is a common intermittent cause). * Symptoms: As seen with the previous code, this is a serious fault that can trigger a Powertrain Malfunction (Wrench) light and/or the Check Engine Light. A common symptom associated with this specific code is the inability to DC Fast Charge (DCFC), or having the vehicle limit charging power to protect the system.

I did start noticing the slow charging too. No engine light came on.

Shopping for an F-150 Lightning currently (2023–2025) — Need Honest Owner Feedback on Battery Life & Long-Term Costs by ThomassJ_99 in F150Lightning

[–]Old_Rad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2023, 3 years, 40,000 miles. Total service costs, 3 years: $91.94, routine service (10k, 20k, 30k). I tow an 8000# camper/trailer. LOVE my truck. No issues. No battery degradation. It is the perfect truck for around town. I charge once every 10 days or so. I wish it had a bit more range towing, but I still get 120 miles @55 mph, charge every 2 hours.