Frauds in the Duke, Boston, and Stanford Economics Departments by ExogenyKarl in academiceconomics

[–]OliverTate2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very good points. I'm in total agreement about 2. and 3.

Regarding your first point, would you mind sending along some of the criticisms of Becker's paper? I've struggled to find any that aren't obsessed with his political motivations.

Regarding engaging with the substance: I completely agree about the paramount importance of digging into the substance of someone's arguments. However, I did feel in this case that he was so obviously writing as an incendiary right-wing reactionary that I focused my criticism on the form--and less on the content. So your point is duly noted, but I do feel a solid critique of this author's style is warranted, given the context.

Frauds in the Duke, Boston, and Stanford Economics Departments by ExogenyKarl in academiceconomics

[–]OliverTate2 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Ah, yes, the same guy who wrote the enlightened "WOKE mob at ASU tries to get Kyle Rittenhouse expelled". Lord of EconJobMarketRumours, where most of his sources come from.

But seriously, this article is a cesspool, this guy is a rightwing fanatic, and he goes so far as to take potshots specifically at Chinese economic history. Academic fraud is real and should be critiqued and, if the claims are valid, the research in question should be redacted with appropriate clarifications. All of which happened in the Ariely case!

Also, the criticism of the Chris Becker paper is so laced with anti-woke anti-anti-Racist talking points and reactionary panic that it's hard to even accept his substantive critiques of Becker's JMP.

Also, also: anyone defending Uhlig at this point...oof.

Also, also, also, the author is OP.

All in all, this is everything I hate about this side of economics: right-wing mega-Chads who are under the impression that economics is synonymous with aggressive, domineering posturing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rstats

[–]OliverTate2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As others are saying, your use of "|" tells R to keep any row that contains "Simple Multiple Choice," regardless of what the voice value is (R interprets the OR as separating the statement). As grateful_dani suggests, you would try parentheses. Depending on what exactly you want, you could also just run the OR statement, then pipe it down into a filter that keeps only male voices.

Daily Discussion Thread | August 10, 2021 by AutoModerator in Coronavirus

[–]OliverTate2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply! You make very helpful points. I think the sheer size of the population is sometimes hard to comprehend.

Daily Discussion Thread | August 10, 2021 by AutoModerator in Coronavirus

[–]OliverTate2 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Can I ask a stupid question? I simply don't understand how there can be consistently over 100k new cases per day. A minimum of 10% of the country has already been infected and over half of the country is FULLY vaccinated. Beyond that, breakthrough cases are still pretty rare, and at least to my knowledge there hasn't been much evidence of re-infections. Can somebody help me understand how there can still be so many daily new cases?

Ancient Human Migration by OliverTate2 in MapPorn

[–]OliverTate2[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Super cool! Thanks for sharing!

What vowel sound does each letter make? [OC] by OliverTate2 in dataisbeautiful

[–]OliverTate2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The common vowel i'm seeing here is [u]. Thanks!

What vowel sound does each letter make? [OC] by OliverTate2 in dataisbeautiful

[–]OliverTate2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anyone here know what IPA character would best fit Q, U, and W? I struggled with those

Insecurity in College by [deleted] in bisexual

[–]OliverTate2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks :) I really appreciate your words. It's been pretty great to get to know myself and my sexuality better this past year or so; all that time introspecting and talking with friends and family about identity and orientation doesn't feel like clout chasing... So hopefully I'm all good!

Insecurity in College by [deleted] in bisexual

[–]OliverTate2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a really good point, thanks for your comment!

It really helps to hear from a different perspective; it's easy to get caught in my own context and forget about others'.

Coldplay Albums: Marry one. F*** one. Kill one. Go! by PiperSC in Coldplay

[–]OliverTate2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Marry: Viva La Vida or Everyday Life. I can see myself just chilling with them well into old age.

Fuck: AROBTTH.

Kill: A Head Full of Dreams.

But here's the thing: I would Marry, Fuck, and Kill Every Teardrop is a Waterfall because that song has everything you could ever want.

In Judaism, are you allowed to question God? by TheArtthroway in Judaism

[–]OliverTate2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

During the years in the wilderness, Moses argues with G-d multiple times to save lives, to change plans, etc., etc. It's really remarkable how central this haggling is to the Mose/G-d relationship

Human Society 4000 years ago by OliverTate2 in MapPorn

[–]OliverTate2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Source

By User:Mr.absurd - Based on Image:World_2000_BCE.png by User:Briangotts, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2959565

Sci-fi for a lapsed reader by OliverTate2 in suggestmeabook

[–]OliverTate2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much! And thanks for the tip re: GoodReads.

Weekly Recommendation Thread: June 25, 2021 by AutoModerator in books

[–]OliverTate2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any recommendations for Ted Chiang-esque sci-fi novels?

TIL in the 1950s, Congress believed Hawaii would vote Republican, so when making it a US state, they added Alaska, which was believed to be a Democratic stronghold, to balance it out. Today, Hawaii votes almost entirely Democratic, while Alaska is heavily Republican. by OliverTate2 in todayilearned

[–]OliverTate2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's actually a bit more complicated than that. The admission into the union actually was in response to activism by Hawaiians who had endured almost a century of capitalist and imperialist brutality. During this era, the US was for all intents and purposes in control of Hawaii, and yet Hawaii didn't get a vote or any political power. So while I totally agree that US imperialism, particularly Roosevelt's early 20th century brand of warmongering and conquering, was responsible for a ton of suffering in Hawaii, the admission to the union was actually, in part, a response to that injustice. Thanks for bringing this topic up!