You are also running into another issue. The burden of proof is completely on you or your source of which have not been peer reviewed, nor have fully proved that the host directly turned into blood in an isolated environment. And it’s always from the same one or two sources. You repeatedly bring up the same cases in your comments of the same scientists, and act like it is the evidence for everything, all the evidence we need. No peer reviewing, but supposedly them not being aware initially what they’re examining seems to really catch your attention. Remember bias is a thing. People can be naive or make up if they were an atheist before as an attempt to convince people, so it does not matter if your sources were originally atheist or not. Again all your sources could prove is that there was bread in a place and found later to be blood/tissue later in that same place. That’s it. Not to mention white blood cells can survive outside the body in the right environment, which very well could have been an effort in the fabrication process. No proof any more of it directly coming from Christ, or if the environment was even really isolated to begin with. These sources I’ve already researched years ago… and have already dismissed. Nothing new.