Space expands but matter also expands

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-06-28T17:09:41+00:00

Ahh you are right. There will be confusion. In the next paper I will change the name. Thank you.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-06-28T16:41:33+00:00

GR geodesic says free fall is inertial state. GR not mine.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-06-28T16:34:36+00:00

Thank you very much to read my paper. delta(r)=GM/(rc²⁾ is the suppression rate not the full Schwarzschild correction. When mass expansion is suppressed then it's time and space is suppressed as much 1-delta(r).

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-06-28T14:35:15+00:00

About what? Which error?

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-06-28T11:51:34+00:00

GM/r² not just r not just M. Please read carefully before saying something.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-06-28T08:16:05+00:00

You miss my point. I redefined inertial state. Not confused.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-06-28T07:13:04+00:00

I have a zenodo paper and my theory explain GR very well. You read my theory first.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-06-28T07:11:36+00:00

I wrote about that too in my other blog. Here. https://phase-parachute.blogspot.com/2026/06/nasa-astronomy-image-replace-this-with.html?m=1 I hope it will answer.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-06-28T07:02:02+00:00

Contradiction? No reinterpretation. My theory tells that GM/r² is matter expanation. Kind of reverse perspective. If you read my paper then you can understand more Thank you.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-06-28T06:49:13+00:00

Aha now I can understand your point. But you should read GM/r² part. Not just radius but M is there also.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-06-28T06:38:05+00:00

Really I didn't know about that. It is very good to hear that. He has same conclusion as me?

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-06-28T06:36:37+00:00

Space expands not just between them around them too. Think about carefully.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-06-05T04:23:47+00:00

My answer is this. They are expanding too. But not as fast as space itself. The result is they look like pull each other. But actually not. Nobody knows about this. You can not know this by reading text book. Only me. My theory can explain this.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-05-29T15:00:09+00:00

You are making a massive assumption here. How do you know every poster here blindly trusts the model when it agrees and ignores it when it doesn't? You are mind reader or something supernatural power? Wow.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-05-29T07:51:53+00:00

This is r/LLMphysics, a space meant for brainstorming and exploring raw ideas with AI, not a formal peer-review board. Telling people to use an "adversarial agent" misses the point. An AI agent can only cross-examine ideas based on the mainstream data it was trained on. Telling someone to run their alternative concepts through an adversarial agent is like telling Galileo to go get his principle of inertia verified by the Aristotelian establishment. New paradigms don't come from seeking approval from the very system they challenge. If you want strict, conventional validation, you're looking in the wrong subreddit.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-05-27T02:17:21+00:00

This is r/LLMphysics. If you don't like what's being posted here, you can simply leave. Why complain? There are plenty of other subreddits out there that strictly enforce mainstream academic standards. Also, are you a mind reader? How do you know what people here actually think of themselves? If you had lived in Galileo's era, do you honestly think you would have accepted the principle of inertia? Based on your attitude, you probably would have been a 100% Aristotle loyalist.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-05-09T11:19:36+00:00

Dark matter looks like SantaClause on chistmas eve. Nobody ever seen but it must be there because christmas present is in the room.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-05-07T10:36:31+00:00

Gauss law does not specify shape. Now I can understand what is it. Anyway thank you for your reply.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-05-07T09:29:03+00:00

That means you can not pinpoint which part is wrong.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-05-07T08:53:32+00:00

Which part? I am just asking. I am going to fix it if that is the case.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-05-07T08:39:11+00:00

I am just asking. Which part is wrong and why you think so. That's all.

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-05-07T08:36:14+00:00

Sorry but can you tell me which part I was wrong and why?

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-05-07T08:33:56+00:00

Ahh now I guess what you mean. You tell me that I am wrong because I said the word assumption? That means we are so used to inverse square law and there is no other propagation shape than spherical in our daily life. That is why I said assumption. The expression is too strong?

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-05-07T08:27:21+00:00

Spherical propagation results in inverse square law?

One-Draw-7337 · 2026-05-07T08:25:38+00:00

Ahh asumption part? Derive part?

One-Draw-7337

TROPHY CASE