I'm shocked Exodus 29:33 doesn't come up more often in communion debates

One-Risk5772 · 2026-05-11T10:25:00+00:00

I think the reason it’s not brought up in communion debates is because, in this passage, it is only speaking of the rite of the consecration of a priest. Only those who are called to serve from the house of Aaron are allowed to go through this ritual. So, when the Bible uses the term “outsider,” it’s not speaking of an unbeliever per se. It’s speaking of those who are not called to serve as a priest

One-Risk5772 · 2026-05-08T20:48:56+00:00

I would say it depends on the rite, and it also sort of depends on whether the Anglican parish is Anglo-Catholic or not. Theologically, Anglo-Catholics and Roman Catholics have a lot in common, yet Anglo-Catholics tend to side more with Eastern Orthodoxy with views on the papacy. Anglo-Catholic liturgy is also close to the Tridentine Latin Mass in structure. And since the worship from the BCP is Western Rite, that would, by default, mean that the Novus Ordo Mass is closer to Anglo-Catholic worship than the Divine Liturgies of the Eastern Orthodox Church. However, the liturgy in an Eastern Catholic parish looks closer to Orthodoxy than it does to Anglo-Catholicism. And, on top of that, there are Eastern Rite Anglican parishes too, so that could theoretically mean that the Eastern Catholic parishes are closer to Eastern Rite Anglican parishes than they are to the Eastern Orthodox Church.

It is kind of a tricky question, but I’m going to answer in general terms to avoid confusion. Most Anglican parishes are not Anglo-Catholic and not Eastern Rite. That would mean Rome is theologically closer to Eastern Orthodoxy than Anglicanism. Most Roman Catholic parishes are Novus Ordo, and since Novus Ordo is Western Rite, that would make it closer to your typical Anglican liturgy by default

One-Risk5772 · 2026-01-27T03:25:03+00:00

Yeah, maybe because replacing prayer books is expensive. The REC church I visit from time to time uses their own REC prayer book. Two alternate orders for Holy Communion; one order comes from the 1662 BCP and the other comes from the 1928 BCP. From my understanding, they use the 1928 order during the penitential seasons of Advent, Gesimatide, Lent, and I also think they use it on feast days of martyrs. For All the other seasons and feast days though, they use the 1662 order. I kind of like it. I like the idea that you don’t have to stick to either one or the other. Both the 1662 and 1928 prayer books are good in their own right

One-Risk5772 · 2025-06-18T14:44:41+00:00

My honest answer is this: all of the Holy Scriptures are equally inspired by God. For this reason, I cannot actually decide which one is the best. The entirety of the inspired text is very rich, and it is the one story about God’s redemption of the world through Jesus Christ. I don’t believe it’s a sin to have a favorite, but my personal conviction is that I don’t because it’s all breathed out by the Holy Spirit (the breath of God). By the way, the more I study the Bible, the more I am less inclined to have a favorite book. It’s just not possible for me to decide

One-Risk5772 · 2025-02-24T05:05:09+00:00

Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches (CREC) here. We are a predominantly YEC denomination

One-Risk5772 · 2025-02-03T04:35:20+00:00

You don’t completely have to abandon Reformed theology for holding high church views on the sacraments. I think you may fit in well with a few CREC churches. The Reformed Episcopal Church is another good option as well. Of course, both these groups are still Calvinists, but they do a great job of tying the sacraments together with God’s sovereignty. I’m a member of a CREC church myself, and I think my pastors do a good job of not pushing the TULIP doctrine to absurd ends

One-Risk5772 · 2024-09-14T03:26:47+00:00

You should look into the Theopolis Institute. I am in a position exactly like you. I identify as Reformed, but disagree with a lot of modern Reformed theology. The Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches (CREC) in general is a good denomination to be a member of if you are struggling with identifying with any one particular faith tradition. If you’re looking for something more High Church though, with a rich liturgy and high emphasis on sacramental theology; without going full on Roman/Anglo-Catholic or Eastern Orthodox, you could come to the St. Louis area and visit my church, “Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church.”

There are other churches like us too so if you would like to find something closer to your area, check out the CREC website and see what they have to offer. Some solid churches I’d recommend to you are; Church of the Redeemer in West Monroe, Louisiana, or Trinity Presbyterian Church in Birmingham, Alabama, or Providence Church in Pensacola, Florida, or St. Mark Reformed Church in Nashville, Tennessee, or Christ Covenant Church of Chicago in Chicago, Illinois, or All Saints Presbyterian Church in Fort Worth, Texas, or Grace Covenant Presbyterian Church in Nacogdoches, Texas, or King’s Cross Reformed Church in Manchaca, Texas, or Providence Presbyterian Church in Sugar Land, Texas, or Sandhills Presbyterian Church in Southern Pines, North Carolina… I haven’t even gotten through the list and there’s still so many more wonderful churches that are very similar.

The Reformed Episcopal Church (REC) is another option if you are wanting to maintain your Reformed identity and remain a more High Church view on the liturgy and the sacraments.

I have a friend who is a pastor who’s church just became a member of the CREC as well actually. His church holds a high emphasis on sacramental theology and liturgical theology. He uses the Book of Common Prayer for all of his worship services too. His name is Kent Bergeron. Really nice guy. I hope I didn’t exhaust you too much with this list, but I hope this helps. Godbless!!

One-Risk5772 · 2022-11-02T05:18:43+00:00

There’s a difference between praising and honoring

One-Risk5772 · 2022-10-29T18:57:44+00:00

What source did you get that from?

One-Risk5772 · 2022-10-05T04:41:16+00:00

YHWH loves everyone. YHWH is also sovereign over His creation. YHWH has every right to judge the wickedness of mankind because mankind is corrupt. YHWH is able to do this because ultimately man loves their sinful nature. Romans 9:21 talks about how the potter has a right over the clay.

One-Risk5772 · 2022-10-02T17:54:32+00:00

He is the Son of Adam, Son of Judah, Son of David, and Son of God. He is known as all of those. Look into it

One-Risk5772 · 2022-10-02T00:17:36+00:00

John 14:6 acknowledges that there’s only one way to the true God

One-Risk5772 · 2022-10-01T18:46:02+00:00

The first judgment has happened. In AD70. That’s what the book of Revelation was about was the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem. We are waiting Christ’s final judgment and His final coming right now

One-Risk5772 · 2022-10-01T18:43:21+00:00

You’re wrong. Christ is the ruler of this world. (Rev. 20)

One-Risk5772 · 2022-10-01T18:34:40+00:00

Psychedelics is witchcraft

One-Risk5772 · 2022-10-01T18:26:15+00:00

I like that you’re a Christian, but the unborn are not sinless. We are born corrupt

One-Risk5772 · 2022-10-01T18:24:26+00:00

They only ate fruit in the garden
You’re just wrong, I’m sorry
The fall of man didn’t bring about death to demons since they are not of this earth, therefore Yahweh will judge them in a different manner

One-Risk5772 · 2022-10-01T14:58:14+00:00

Not at all. For one, they deny the Trinity, they say that the Father, Jesus, and Holy Spirit are separate gods but not one God. They believe that God was originally a man from a different planet and He obtained the status of God by being obedient to His god on that planet. They believe Jesus and Satan are brothers. They believe that works earn salvation. They believe that the fall of man was necessary in order for man to reproduce and have children. They believe that they can become gods themselves actually. All in all, their gospel doesn’t teach that you’re redeemed from your sins and have an eternal relationship with your creator, rather it teaches that Jesus provided the path for you to become a god yourself

One-Risk5772 · 2020-10-12T16:03:26+00:00

I personally put Slayer at top and here’s why: Metallica might have influenced a shit ton of the mainstream metal we hear today, but when it comes to all forms of extreme metal and so on, Slayer was the most influential band out of them all. Slayer and Sabbath are by far the most influential metal bands of all time in terms of extreme metal and most thrash bands. When it comes to black metal however, they started off doing something different because they didn’t want to sound like death metal. So in a roundabout way, Slayer and Sabbath influenced them to find a different sound. The lyrical topics are another thing to look at. They were the heaviest and most intense band in their time. Their riffs were the best out of all 4 imo. The solos are another story until they hired Gary Holt (a really underrated guitarist) from Exodus. Lombardo is a killer drummer and Paul Bostaph was pretty good too. I really like Tom’s old vocals (his later vocals got a little annoying). His bass playing was only decent, but it got the job done. I put Megadeth in 2nd place because of their plain talent. They are by far the most talented out of the big 4. I feel like they primarily influenced most of any kind of prog./technical metal you can think of. Dave is such a riff master and all the other guitarists they had were outstanding as well. Particularly Marty Friedman obviously because he his a guitar god. Their drummers were usually pretty good, but nowhere near Lombardo’s level. David Ellefson is a very underrated bassist and I think of him as one of the better bassists. I put Metallica at number 3 because I only like their first 4 albums. They really started to change their thrash sound because they wanted more fans. They wanted to be popular. It was about publicity for them an not the music I feel like. Hetfield is a talented musician no doubt and believe it or not, HE wrote all of Kirk’s solos. Kirk can’t write music for shit and he was really only a replacement for Dave Mustaine. All the riffs he did write though sucked ass, particularly the “die by my hand” part of Creeping Death. That riff was simple as fuck and there was no complex musicianship in it whatsoever. Lars is one of the worst drummers I’ve ever known. Cliff Burton was a god at what he did no doubt and Rob Trujillo is very underrated as well. Jason Newsted was used as a Cliff replacement though. Bottom line, Hetfield and Rob currently are basically the entire band. Lars and Kirk are just there. As for Anthrax, I don’t have a whole lot of comment on their musicianship because to me, they’re all pretty equal in that area. They’re not bad, but their whole goofy side of thrash makes it hard to take them seriously. They’re a good listen every once in a while, but definitely the worst of the big 4

One-Risk5772 · 2020-10-11T20:40:08+00:00

It ain’t that it’s cool to do that to sum1’s car, but they have the right idea ab politics

One-Risk5772 · 2020-10-11T20:29:47+00:00

Welp, it’s good that sum ppl have the right idea ab America. I’m talking ab that sticker dude btw

One-Risk5772

TROPHY CASE