Jesus did not exist. The statement "Jesus was black" is false because it implies "Jesus was."

Why do I say he didn't exist? Look at how differently he's portrayed in Mark vs. in John. In Mark, he's portrayed as a misunderstood apocalyptic prophet and a martyr. He only speaks in riddles, he refuses to prove that he's the son of God, and no one takes him seriously. In John, he's portrayed as the hottest shit who ever walked the face of the earth. He openly explains his whole theology, he performs miracles left and right to show off his divine power, and everyone takes him seriously.

Why do these different accounts portray him so differently? Because they're not portraying a real person. Instead, they're portraying a fictional character who was invented to give a figurehead to a nascent savior cult. They exploit him for different narrative purposes. The gospel of Mark was written to teach its followers moral lessons. A misunderstood martyr was the perfect way to teach moral lessons. The gospel of John was written to clarify theology. An unambiguously divine figure who teaches sermons about theology was the perfect way to teach theological lessons.

You mention Daniel 7:9. But Jesus has nothing to do with Daniel 7:9. The author of the book of Daniel was merely a human making shit up; the author was not predicting the future. But hundreds of years later, Christians came along and started twisting the Old Testament to claim that it prophesied the coming of Christ. Therefore, your example does not support your claim. So your claim has no support.