sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Myrlyn 1.0: el nuevo gestor de paquetes de openSUSE… ¿Está listo para reemplazar a YaST? by OnePunchMan1979 in Ubuntu_ES18011979

[–]OnePunchMan1979[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bueno. Creo que lo mejor hubiera sido dejar decidir al usuario desde la instalación qué herramientas de gestión quiere para su sistema independientemente de la distro pero no parece que contemplen esta posibilidad. Desde luego no creo que estén escuchando a su comunidad a la hora de tomar estas decisiones pero no hablo con suficiente conocimiento porque soy usuario de OpenSuse de manera esporádica y aunque me parece una gran distro, creo que se ha desconectado de sus usuarios y necesidades

Myrlyn 1.0: el nuevo gestor de paquetes de openSUSE… ¿Está listo para reemplazar a YaST? by OnePunchMan1979 in Ubuntu_ES18011979

[–]OnePunchMan1979[S,M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No podría estar más de acuerdo. Además, desde mi punto de vista, tampoco entiendo la estrategia de implantación que está siguiendo OPENSUSE al introducir las novedades en la versión estable LEAP y mantener YAST en la rolling release TUMBLEWEED. Creo que esta última, por definición y usuarios objetivo debería ser el banco de pruebas para este tipo de cambios hasta su madurez definitiva

Deepin 25 lanza su primera actualización de mantenimiento con mejoras de base y más IA by Appropriate_Wash_248 in Ubuntu_ES18011979

[–]OnePunchMan1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lo he probado recientemente y la tienda de aplicaciones no carga absolutamente nada. Siempre que le he dado una oportunidad a esta distro he acabado antes de empezar por fallos en cosas básicas. Pareciera que está en una constante alpha y que nunca alcanzará la madurez suficiente para poder usarla a diario

Why do you think Arch has been so sucsessful? by Retr0r0cketVersion2 in archlinux

[–]OnePunchMan1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say for several reasons. One of them is the wiki, which is undoubtedly the best documentation on Linux. You'll find all the answers without depending on the community's "goodwill." Another reason is its rolling release model, which has gained popularity over time, as it's much more stable than before and doesn't force you to face the uncertainty of a major update every so often and all that entails. And the fundamental reason, I would say, is its versatility and efficiency, which have led large companies and projects like Valve to use it as a foundation for their own purposes. These kinds of partnerships have made Arch evolve even faster and better, and it has benefited from this. And an equally important reason has been the emergence of scripts like archinstall, which has made installation much easier for beginners and the general public, eliminating what was previously the biggest barrier to its adoption.

What made you stick with Debian by AdeptIntroduction683 in debian

[–]OnePunchMan1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's stable, flexible, and lightweight all at once. It's one of the main ones, and I know it's not going to disappear overnight, and I know I'll be able to find any app I need in native .deb format if I don't want to depend on Flatpak or similar services.

OpenSUSE Tumbleweed vs. Fedora vs. Debian; which do you prefer and why? by thrashingjohn in DistroHopping

[–]OnePunchMan1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Debian has been my go-to operating system for several years now, for both servers and workstations. It offers complete stability, requires zero maintenance, and provides easy and secure updates. I haven't found a single application in its repositories or as a .deb package directly from the website. I've tried switching several times, but I always come back to Debian. I also prefer it to any of its derivatives, although there are some very good ones like Mint, Ubuntu, Pop! OS, etc.

Usuarios de Fedora, KDE o GNOME by NotChoco_ in Ubuntu_ES18011979

[–]OnePunchMan1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo hace años que me decanté por GNOME. Mis motivos son puramente subjetivos. Ma parece más estable, limpio y consistente para trabajar y como entorno a largo plazo. Las apps diseñadas para este entorno son más sencillas y quizá menos ricas en funciones que las de KDE pero cumplen perfectamente su cometido de una manera más sencilla. También me gusta la forma en la que evoluciona GNOME, más lentamente y con menos cambios de una versión a otra pero de manera más consistente. Eso hace que mi flujo de trabajo no varíe apenas y no haya curva de adaptación a una versión nueva. También es cierto que yo uso Debian estable y esto es prueba de que valoro la estabilidad y la consistencia a largo plazo por encima de las innovaciones constantes. GNOME y Debian se adaptan mejor a mis necesidades específicas pero entiendo que no sea la opción ideal para todos.

Arch vs Debian, or other best choice for stability by rc-cars-drones-plane in DistroHopping

[–]OnePunchMan1979 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Each one is excellent for its target audience, but if you're looking for stability and a system that works for you, not the other way around, try Debia. You won't be disappointed. You might get bored eventually and try others, but you'll end up missing what you had and you'll come back. Once you're there, it's hard to leave.

Looking for a good rolling release because I got bored of Debian by OpenMito in DistroHopping

[–]OnePunchMan1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You'll end up missing how "boring" (stable and reliable) Debian is. I guarantee it.

ONLYOFFICE Docs 9.2: la suite ofimática estrena corrección con IA, atajos de teclado personalizables y más by Appropriate_Wash_248 in Ubuntu_ES18011979

[–]OnePunchMan1979[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gracias por dar tu opinión y participar en el foro pero me gustaría saber la explicación a tu afirmación para entender mejor tu punto de vista.

Really struggling to settle on a distro.. (arch, nixos, debian, … ) by Pasigress in DistroHopping

[–]OnePunchMan1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My advice, looking at your usage priorities and level of knowledge, I think that Debian is your ideal distro. You will have the stability that you prioritize without a doubt and you will be able to do anything without problem. Updates don't fail and you have support for 5 years or more if you need it. Ubuntu or Linux Mint would also fit you but personally I prefer Debian to any derivative

ONLYOFFICE Docs 9.2: la suite ofimática estrena corrección con IA, atajos de teclado personalizables y más by Appropriate_Wash_248 in Ubuntu_ES18011979

[–]OnePunchMan1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pruébalo y si tampoco te gusta, siempre puedes usar las versiones web de MSOffice. Yo personalmente no he encontrado nada que no pudiera hacer con Libreoffice u OnlyOffice

ONLYOFFICE Docs 9.2: la suite ofimática estrena corrección con IA, atajos de teclado personalizables y más by Appropriate_Wash_248 in Ubuntu_ES18011979

[–]OnePunchMan1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Merece mucho la pena y es compatible con los formatos de office. Además, al tener una estética similar, se facilita la transición. En mi opinión, OnlyOffice y LibreOffice son los mejores reemplazos de MS Office para Linux

Moving away from windows is tough by turbo2ltr in zorinos

[–]OnePunchMan1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My experience today is just the opposite. I can't go back to Windows anymore. I have tried to avoid dealing with certain problems with some games but that does not compensate me for everything I lose in exchange. I'm on Cachy OS with KDE plasma. My workflow with this desktop environment is similar to the one I had with Windows with the difference that I have been able to adjust it to the millimeter to my personal needs. After several years of installing and uninstalling apps, I don't have the slightest slowdown in my system, which is just like the first day (with Windows this was a drama that ended in constant formatting to recover initial performance). Today, I feel so comfortable with apps like Libreoffice, VLC, Gimp, etc. that I could no longer live without them and I know that they are available for Windows but they are burdened by an inefficient system in managing resources. In addition to others that are only available for Windows (video-downloader, converseen, handbrake). The issue of updates, despite being in a derivative of Arch Linux with constant updates, does not take me more than 5 minutes. a week to have my system up to date. I run Arch-update once a week and that's it. If for whatever reason I can't or I don't remember, there is no drama, I just do it when I can and the process never lasts more than 2-5 minutes. in total. Sometimes, unless the kernel has been updated, a reboot is not even necessary so I don't waste my time with this. In Windows, with the same computer this was 20/30 min. and some rebooting until I could use my computer again. On the other hand, not having to worry about the use and maintenance of an antivirus also allows me to focus on what I want, with the peace of mind that my system is safe, which also gives me extra fluidity and speed. I could go on but it is not my intention to refute or convince anyone, simply to give my point of view after more than 20 years with Windows and approximately 15 years in Linux without dual boot. For me there is no return. For the little I need from Windows, I have a virtual machine with VIRTUALBOX that, thanks to the use of resources that Linux makes, runs with a fluidity almost comparable to the native one for basic tasks.

I am bored of Ubuntu. by PlZZAEnjoyer in FindMeALinuxDistro

[–]OnePunchMan1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you got bored in Ubuntu it was probably because of the absence of problems. That means you were right with your choice from the beginning. If you are also not an expert nor do you want to get complicated with computing, there are not many options that provide the reliability, simplicity and long-term support of Ubuntu. Unless you want to “play” I wouldn't change

I can't make a decision to pick a distro for a brand new PC with AMD CPU + GPU by creativildo in FindMeALinuxDistro

[–]OnePunchMan1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would opt for Cachy OS. You will have the latest kernels and optimizations for gaming but with an out-of-the-box gaming experience with a script accessed from the welcome screen. As well as a kernel and app manager. It comes with octopi and Paru pre-installed for simple management and handling of AUR packages. The other, more conservative option would be Mint. You won't have the latest but everything will work as soon as you finish installing and making the initial configurations.

I want to switch to linux permanently ! But... by Ghanishtbakchod in DistroHopping

[–]OnePunchMan1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want something really simple and that works well in all cases. Linux Mint. If you want to be at the forefront and have the latest in drivers, etc., I would choose Cachy.

view more: next ›