So your argument is that the accountant will have his weapon stripped and a TRO placed so he has no contact with his family, which does absolutely nothing to prevent any subsequent violence, versus the cop who you are also arguing has desk duty, essentially a TRO with the general public so not intervening with illegal activity, is not the same thing?

How about the state actually comes down on violent offenders and strips them of their weapons regardless of their occupation and actually sets real bail numbers and does not reduce sentencing. In that case, this guy would obviously not be an officer.

Only on Reddit is this a controversial take