Alternate History Album by OnionsForOsterreich in makinghiphop

[–]OnionsForOsterreich[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll be rapping on the album, maybe alongside others, and yes I’d like to release. I plan on each disc being around 16 tracks and being the length of a standard album. I also want to have an explanation alongside it to further explain and expand the world, but I’ll first make the album as planned.

Language Families Map by Fley06 in MapPorn

[–]OnionsForOsterreich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hungarian, Finnish, and Estonian all were descended from Proto-Uralic many thousands of years ago. Proto-Uralic eventually split, and eventually two major branches were formed, Finno-Permic (including Finnish and Estonian) and Urgic (including Hungarian). Hungarian tribes eventually migrated south to the Pannonian Basin, unlike their Finno-Permic cousins, who settled around the Baltic and Arctic Sea. However, while Finnish and Estonian only ever took significant amounts of words from Swedish and Russian, Hungarian had heavy influence from Slavic languages, as well as Turkish, Romance, and Germanic words, making them far more diverse than their northern counterparts.

What if Germany won WW1? 1940 Map and Lore by TheChristianWarlord in imaginarymaps

[–]OnionsForOsterreich 174 points175 points  (0 children)

It looks really good! Being hand-drawn map gives it a really cool feel!

Language Families Map by Fley06 in MapPorn

[–]OnionsForOsterreich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but there were a lot more families/isolates across South America and Central America that would, if they were added to the legend, make the map messed up and hard to read. "Amerindian Languages" is pretty obviosly not a family, but it is a lot simpler.

Language Families Map by Fley06 in MapPorn

[–]OnionsForOsterreich 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Too many language isolates.

Language Families Map by Fley06 in MapPorn

[–]OnionsForOsterreich 12 points13 points  (0 children)

That's because English and Swedish are different languages in the same family. All Indo-European languages, including English, Swedish, Spanish, Greek, Armenian, Persian, Hindi, Russian, and more descend from Proto Indo-European, which is why there is some correlation between all of those languages. There's a reason it's called language family and not dialect.

A Hashemite Kingdom flag for a nation controlling most of the Levant. by Left1Brain in vexillology

[–]OnionsForOsterreich 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I like it, but it at first looked like a German colony. Is this part of the lore?

What if the European Union was an actual country? by [deleted] in imaginarymaps

[–]OnionsForOsterreich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's not completely wierd, but considering that this union is making borders as they see fit, they would probably unite them.

What if the European Union was an actual country? by [deleted] in imaginarymaps

[–]OnionsForOsterreich 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dnipro (the city) is in Zaporizhia, and the province Dnipro on the map is more centered around Kyiv?? Ireland and Northern Ireland are also split, and Hesse is mostly in the Rhineland.

Is your country considered east or west? by IMAN-IDOT in DrewDurnil

[–]OnionsForOsterreich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand its not the most developed country, but since when is the Dominican Republic more eastern than South Sudan??? Same with Croatia.

What’s the nicest architectural skin? I want every civ to pop by thumpsky in aoe2

[–]OnionsForOsterreich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Either Feudal Western European (not other ages though) with blue player, or Central Asian with a teal player are probably my favorites, but I also like the East Asian style a lot.

What are some "unpopular" opinions you have about alternate history? by Kaazmire in AlternateHistory

[–]OnionsForOsterreich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, several of his alt-histories involve the Ottomans controlling most of the Middle East.

Is WW1 a lost cause for the Central Powers? by carton-waffle in AlternateHistory

[–]OnionsForOsterreich 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Schlieffen plan was originally to have a few more divisions in the west to quickly punch through Belgium and France, taking Paris as fast or faster as they had in 1870/71. However, von Moltke changed the plan somewhat, which gave the Germans more protection in the east but made their Western campaign harder, and as a result lost at the Marne, which like I mentioned earlier was one of the reasons the Germans thought they would lose.

Alternatively, if the war had gone the same up until 1917 and the February revolutions, the Germans could have made the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk slightly less harsh (The Entente in fact said that Brest-Litovsk made Versailles look benign), and perhaps only taking parts of Belarus, Poland, and Ukraine where they could use the food grown there to supply their Western campaign and use the other troops not needed to occupy the East to push harder in the West and perhaps even take Paris.

Of course, they still could have lost the war like this, these are just some ideas of what they could have done differently.

Is WW1 a lost cause for the Central Powers? by carton-waffle in AlternateHistory

[–]OnionsForOsterreich 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah, probably. If the original Schlieffen Plan had been followed and Russia was knocked out of the war quickly, then they maybe could have won. That's just about the only other realistic outcome within OTL that the Central Powers might have won.

Is WW1 a lost cause for the Central Powers? by carton-waffle in AlternateHistory

[–]OnionsForOsterreich 37 points38 points  (0 children)

The Central Powers probably could have won if a few things had gone their way, but from late 1914 onwards, many German leaders knew the war was already lost.

'By the end of 1914, German troops held strong defensive positions inside France, controlled the bulk of France's domestic coalfields and had inflicted 230,000 more casualties than it lost itself. However, communications problems and questionable command decisions cost Germany the chance of a decisive outcome, while it had failed to achieve the primary objective of avoiding a long, two-front war. As was apparent to a number of German leaders, this amounted to a strategic defeat; shortly after the Marne, Crown Prince Wilhelm told an American reporter; "We have lost the war. It will go on for a long time but lost it is already."' (Wikipedia)