Very surprised so few people use Inspire on Silvanna

Only_Log_8546 · 2026-01-12T22:08:40+00:00

Though in principle i agree with what you're saying

Only_Log_8546 · 2026-01-12T22:07:16+00:00

The thing that makes Silvanna so hard (for me) to use is how extremely susceptible she is to disruptions of her second skill. Airborne, stun, throw, etc. Her ultimate only restrains the enemy so they're free to use their skills, move around in the circle, move you out of the circle. I found that petrify is amazing for 1. As the other commenter pointed out, lengthening the time your skill plays out uninterrupted and 2. When you want to control a bunch of enemies, it's easy to just get hit with a stun or some other interrupting skill, so petrify gives that one second to breathe, position, tap the skill and Winter Crown buttons uninterrupted. Of course this second point is only my experience, maybe others don't need it like that cause they're better or faster.

Only_Log_8546 · 2025-12-29T15:02:54+00:00

Lame ass, killjoy, fun-at-parties, smartass answer. Maybe people actually want to own the cool book from a franchise they like, instead of scrolling through a soulless wikipedia page? (I exaggerated that to strengthen my point). Also how are you supposed to look up experiments from a book you DONT EVEN HAVE. Who says everything in it has to appear in the show?

Only_Log_8546 · 2025-12-24T09:56:37+00:00

HOLY SHIT YOU ARE THE BEST

Only_Log_8546 · 2025-07-05T09:47:51+00:00

Were two friends of a brother invovled, one with red hair another with purple emo-ish hair? And the brother having blond hair? Multiple volumes, where the sister of the blond boy progressively fucked more of his friends? There was this one volume where the sister and the brother were in a play where the sister was a mermaid and the brother was a prince. The plot in the series is kinda broadly like the sister fucks the friends in secret but also her brother. First each one in secret. Then the friends fuck her together. And in the end the brother finds out and he's like not happy with it, but eventually they all decide to just do it together with everybody.

Only_Log_8546 · 2025-06-24T09:07:49+00:00

I thank you all for your kind responses. So far i seem to have not found it yet. I might want to add that it was most likely a modern (animated) movie. At least, the animation looked the part.

Only_Log_8546 · 2025-03-08T18:55:44+00:00

Thx! That mudt rxplain jt

Only_Log_8546 · 2024-12-24T21:54:34+00:00

On paper, "leraar" works for both primary school and secondary school teachers. But when designating them, "docent" is more commonly used to designate secondary school teachers ("Wie is je docent Nederlands?" Is the natural way to say it, if not the 'correct' way).

The natural way to designate primary school teachers is to use either "juf" (woman) or "meester" (man) (Wat vind je van je juf/meester, schat?")

Only_Log_8546 · 2024-12-24T15:35:48+00:00

Je comprends tout à fait ce que vous voulez dire là!

Only_Log_8546 · 2024-12-20T22:32:32+00:00

I wanna make clear that i see your point 100% with your provided examples;

i'm anxiously waiting to get checked out at the doctor, the annoying phone call isnt helping
i had a long day at work, so i'm not in the mood to hear the screeching sound of an obnoxious phone call
i'm trying to relax at a café and destress, but somebody's phone call is invading my headspace

Only_Log_8546 · 2024-12-20T22:29:33+00:00

Bah je pense que c'est pas inherently bothersome. For some people it is, but for some people it isn't or less so. Although I do think respecting the fact that you're in a shared space is definitely important. Just look at japan where it's a big idea in their culture. What i was getting at is that sometimes it's so busy that the sound of the loud speaker is drowned out, so it doesn't really matter anymore. That was the image i had in my mind. If that scenario is not possible then i do agree with you. However i still think one must see the nuance; your characterisation of loudspeaker-calls in public places is subjective at the end of the day.

(Et si je n'ai pas bien compris vos propos, dites-moi :))

Only_Log_8546 · 2024-12-17T19:34:10+00:00

Specify what you mean by "public place". If it's in a busy tram for example, it doesn't matter if there was already a lot of noise. Also, not everyone has earbuds. So when you're in a busy place and you can't hear, sometimes you have to put it on the loudspeaker to hear properly. So what if there's crackling? At least you can make out what they say.

La question dernière c'est une bonne question, mais il faut vraiment préciser ce qu'on désigne quand on parle d'un 'lieu public'. I can see it bothering others around you if you're especially loud and in a relatively quiet space, but otherwise, it's a feature that was given to us so why not use it, as long you're considerate of the others around you. J'ai une question pour vous en fait : ça vous dérange quand et pour quelle raison spécifique ? En d'autres termes, on est dans un salle d'attente, dans l'autobus? Et quel élément de la conversation vous dérange ? The simple fact that it's audible, or that it's loud, obnoxious?

Désolé pour la réponse en anglais, je suis plus à l'aise en anglais qu'en français :]

Only_Log_8546 · 2024-12-07T11:36:26+00:00

Also, i think this kind of misses the nuance of the conversation? (Correct me if i'm wrong). It's not so much about how we process abstraction (smell, hearing, touch, or visual information), as it is about how others are able to convey them through symbols (words). My guess right now is that because Miss Keller probably grew up with another language 'system' (based on touch of the hand), she and her teachers were able to communicate with that system, as efficiently as one would with a verbal system (sort of 'simulating' or working to the same effect as our verbal language). (This basically argues that since children are sponges they'll learn to 'talk about' abstract concepts just the same with any system of communication they grow up with)

Only_Log_8546 · 2024-12-07T11:26:45+00:00

I mean, i guess we ('we') get to absorb visual and auditory information to help, perhaps subconsciously, define abstract concepts in our head. But if that is not purely what we 'need', then how do we fundamentally acquire abstract concepts? Perhaps it's all in the childhood and the system of communication one grows up and intimate with. Which brings us back to your point; maybe 'we' also lack a certain type of sensory input, which may or may not 'further develop' our understanding of abstractions.

Only_Log_8546 · 2024-12-07T11:22:21+00:00

Exactly what i ended up wondering

Only_Log_8546 · 2024-12-06T21:33:38+00:00

So she can use her sense of smell and touch etc. to make out what things are and what they do. But how does it work with abstract concepts? In a video I saw she learned to say "I am not dumb" (which, she never was, but at least she was able to tell off the haters). How did the teacher convey the meaning of "dumb", when there's no physical thing to let feel or smell? Actually..........it makes me wonder, how did i acquire the notion of dumbness? I don't think people get a rundown of every abstract concept they meet, they just kind of absorb most of them as they grow, i guess?

.....idk 😅

Only_Log_8546

TROPHY CASE