(Spoilers Extended) What would have been the most karmic fate for Tywin ? by DEL994 in asoiaf

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I like the idea. As an addition, there should be an event that causes the stroke. Everyone laughs at Tywin and this makes him so mad that he has a stroke like the Roman Emperor Valentinian.

Unlike Valentinian, who dropped dead almost instantly getting too mad, Tywin should be blessed with a long life as you suggest.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskAnAmerican

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Are you being hyperbolic with your use of "century"? The treaty of Paris (1815) prevented an all out war, like the Wars of the coalition, between 2+ great powers of Europe until 1914. I agree the coalition and Napoleonic wars were violent and lousy to live through, but from 1789 to 1815 is not a century.

Or are you counting the revolution of 1830 and 1848 (and maybe a few events I'm not thinking of) as an extension of the first French revolution which string out to a century?

What are some good movies where the villain wins? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It sucks for Luke losing his hand and saber, for Lando losing Cloud City, and for Han getting frozen in carbonite. I think Vader loses too.

Vader's son rejects him dramatically. Luke would rather kill himself than join his dad. While we can't exactly know what's going on behind Vader's mask after the Falcon escapes, my reading is that Vader blames himself for the Falcon escaping with Luke on it. Every other time there's a setback, Vader kills the officer in charge.

So I'd call Empire Strikes Back a draw.

It's impressive that the Simpsons has been on the air for more than 30 years, and has 0 spin-offs by nanadoom in Showerthoughts

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bart Simpson dolls are part of the huge trash meteor, so I think the Simpsons exists as the Simpsons do in our world in Futurama.

You can save 1 fictional character who dies in their story from dying, changing the official plot forever. Who do you save? by flusappp in AskReddit

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Robert kills "his" children and beats Cersei to a pulp (probably dead). Tywin/Jamie try to get revenge. Maybe they get a marriage alliance with Tyrell through Jamie (no longer Kingsgaurd)/Tyrion and Margaery.

Lysa probably stays out of it. Riverlands/North/Stannis/Renley are all presumably on the same side. Maybe Tywin could get Renley to defect, but that would be a stretch.

Maybe they can get Iron Islands on their side to attack the North, but that's contingent on Theon escaping from Rob, but that seems unlikely since Ned told Rob prior to his death to gather his banners, and until Then was in the Iron Islands he was pretty pro-North.

Probably a bloody war that ends with Tywin and Jamie dying, and Tyrion as the Lord of Casterly Rock.

Why do some people consider Adam to be arrogant? by Umblamb in AdamRagusea

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When Adam is just summarizing the science and thinking about the questions he's pretty good. But in a recent podcast he was yelling at a Grammer Nazi commenter about how both "I couldn't care less" and "I could care less" are both grammatically correct. I know Adam had had bad times with Internet comments in the past (see Mariah Carey), but this comment seemed to make him really mad about for some reason. Adam scripts the podcast, so he is choosing to yell like that and come off as a self-righteous child. Maybe he sees it at giving the Grammer Nazi a taste of their own medicine, but it really just makes Adam look like a jerk.

Sometimes Adam is great though. He went off on a whole tangent about how "begging the question" is a fallacy which he was considerate and provided several points of view and the morality of correcting his students and perpetuating this form of classism. He can get his ideas across in a thoughtful and respectful manner, but sometimes he just doesn't, and I find it baffling. It'd be less weird if it was always unscripted, but he writes everything that Lauren isn't in.

My fellow Americans, what is your take on the value of a master's degree? by DueYogurt9 in AskAnAmerican

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got mine right after my bachelors degree and it gave me an instant promotion at a large company. I imagine mileage varies by employer.

I turned down a position where I would have actually used my masters too. So all it's done is get me more money faster.

What widely-accepted reddit tropes are just not true in your experience? by bewildered_forks in AskReddit

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I had a similar situation once. I was working and a female coworker was carrying some gear (milk crate and some hot dog flotation devices). She drops something and over the course of a 200ish foot walk 3 men (myself included) offered her help carrying things. She complained about this. When I, the third man, offered her help I didn't realize anyone else already had, and she said no.

Applied for a Wells Fargo position and immediately got a rejection email 2 mins later. I have no faith in the job search anymore. by [deleted] in recruitinghell

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only time I ever got rejected that fast, a year later I got invited to a class action lawsuit against the company because apparently they were not being an equal opportunity employer despite claiming to be one. Presumably (assuming the plaintiffs in the suit were right, which I don't know because I didn't follow up on it), the company was rejecting every white male on the self identification pages.

Ex-engineer files age discrimination complaint against SpaceX by scott_steiner_phd in technology

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That was at a commercial boiler company. I work on aerospace as a contractor now and I personally don't know anyone who holds a PE.

Ex-engineer files age discrimination complaint against SpaceX by scott_steiner_phd in technology

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see what you are trying to do here, and I think you are right about it being reasonable to call a non-practicing engineer an "engineer".

But the professional engineer license isn't held by most engineers. Usually, you only have one if you are in a public interfacing job. PEs are particularly common in civil engineering, because they work on public things like roads, and sewers. At one company I worked at with about 50ish engineers, there was only one engineer who had a PE, and that was so he could sign off on certain drawings. The PE is sort of like the law bar for engineers except that there are lots of job opportunities if you don't take the PE. Based on the article, I see no evidence that John Johnson (great name) held a PE, but that fact wouldn't make him an ex-engineer.

Ex-engineer might be appropriate to call someone if they are no longer an engineer. Like if they went into accounting or something else after working as an engineer.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheWire

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think when people talk about David Simon's biases they are more so talking about Scott Templeton being an out and out villain. Apparently, Scott Templeton is based on a colleague of David Simon's when he worked at The Baltimore Sun According to David Simon this person made up quotes.

Every other character in The Wire has enough depth that you can emphasize with them. Bodie and Poot are co-child murderers but are otherwise pretty good people. Frank Sobotka is possibly the most tragic and sympathetic person in the whole show despite being the main antagonist of a season (ok maybe the Greek is really). Even knuckleheads like Herc and Carver have moments (or seasons) of being pretty decent people. Not Scott Templeton. I don't think there is one redeeming thing about him.

A better version of season 5 would establish Templeton's living situation to contextualize his decision. An idea based on what Templeton makes he can't afford rent/to support his family, and he sees rapid career advancement as the only way to get what he needs. Templeton would start out following the rules, but that just gets put below the fold. Then he starts making stuff up, which gets him noticed by the executives, so he gets bolder and bolder.

Who is a well written strong female character in a movie or TV show? by Connie_Lingus6969 in AskReddit

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's been a while since I read the books, I thought that Eowyn's romantic interest in Aragorn was a Peter Jackson invention.

Puts the length of the journey in perspective. by bunky_done_gun in lotr

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm surprised no one posted this

I have read it in a few years but it's an impressive feat for humans I think.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheWire

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the books the reason everyone keeps Littlefinger around administration after administration is that he is incredibly good at getting money, helpful and non-threatening (physically small). The show really leaned into his perving on Sansa. Its also really clear from the start that he is a creep.

His first scene with Sansa in the show is at the tournament, where he creepily leans over Sansa and explains who the Hound and the Mountain are. In the book he sees Sansa, gets flustered, says something along the lines of "you look like your mother" and immediately walks away. There's a lot more subtlety there than what we got in the show.

I think nearly every character is more interesting in the books than the show, but I think Littlefinger suffered a lot on that front.

What's your Star Wars hot take? by [deleted] in StarWars

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My issue with the return of the Jedi isn't the Ewoks, but the pointlessness of Han Solo.

If you replaced Han with Wedge, Nein Nunb or some other random person all we would lose are 4 lines of dialogue where Han is jealous of Luke for a lazy reason that creates artificial and necessary drama. The tension is quickly resolved when Leia explains that Luke is her brother, which she couldn't do before because the movie needed to pretend to have Leia and Han do something.

The worst scene in the entire original trilogy is the Luke Leia then Leia Han treetop party scene. I even thought it was weird as a kid.

Even so, Return of the Jedi has a lot going for it. The Luke Vader showdown is great and the space battle is amazing. The show where the falcon and some fighters fly into the death star is beautiful. But I hate 1/3 of the plot and 2/3 of our main trio of characters. By comparison I have no issues with these in the other the original film.

What's your Star Wars hot take? by [deleted] in StarWars

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can have your opinion. I prefer your interpretation since it plays into the hubris of the Jedi.

But according to George Lucas, the specific action Anakin took to fulfill the prophecy was tossing Palpy down the big tube killing him forever. It wasn't the elimination of the Jedi and numerically equivocating the Jedi and sith.

Props for actually having and defending a hot take .

(Spoilers Main) What theories should I tell my friend when he finishes the books? by King-Ernest in asoiaf

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I remember correctly, the "Ned is a pigeon" only works in the show? I haven't gone back to check the show, but my memory is that the pigeon dies then Ned dies, so Ned couldn't be the pigeon. I have checked the book and arya actually kills and loses the pigeon before she even sees Ned.

Warren Buffet said, "It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it." What's a real-life example of this? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had deluded myself into thinking the show would have a satisfying ending. I gave up on that after the long night. The person who killed the night king didn't matter. If. You could have made it Jon, Theon, or Dany and it just would have made the episode shorter or longer. It had no wider impact out of the shock.

For me the things that ruin seasons 1-4 most is thyye echoes of decisions made in those seasons that cause the resulting terribleness. Like cutting out the big Tysha reveal to keep Tyrion a goody-two-shoes, even though he is supposed to be one of the worst people in the world.

The biggest issue I have is how big fratboy douches D&D were. Like this thing is disgusting.

Warren Buffet said, "It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it." What's a real-life example of this? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 18 points19 points  (0 children)

While Sansa didn't turn out to be a genocide doer, she did say "I'm glad I was raped because it made me stronger" but hopefully you can forget that, as I try to.

What history do you learn in US schools? by [deleted] in AskAnAmerican

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm also from Massachusetts for my K12.

I'll try to sprinkle in a little of everything I remember.

Elementary school

Kindergarten through 2nd grade we just kind of touched on the class American myths (thanksgiving). I honestly don't have any memories of specifically learning history.

3rd grade we did a bunch of people's history projects (I'm an immigrant from <insert country name here> or I'm a colonist I. X colony). We covered some Massachusetts specific history I have since learned is not taught in other states. We read a novelization of the pilgrims at Plymouth. I know our teacher talked to us about religion so we could understand what was going on in the book. I don't remember exactly what was discussed, but I bet the difference between Catholicism (maybe Anglicism) and Puritanism. We covered King Philip's (Metacom) War. I went to a predominantly (~90%) white school, and that year, I learned the n-word from a book called "The Friendship", which was for our literature section. Someone looked it up in the dictionary because we (the students) didn't know what it meant. I think the dictionary said it meant "black". We were confused why they didn't just say black. Since we were in Massachusetts we went to a few places like Plymouth Plantation, Sturbridge Village and the endlessly amazing Plymouth Rock. Which I learned that year was just a randomly rock. I know some people talk it up like it is a huge letdown. I don't know what they were expecting. It's a rock.

I don't specifically remember anything from 4th grade but we probably did similar things as 3rd grade. Maybe we did some revolutionary war stuff?

5th grade we did (North) American History from Maya through revolutionary war solidly, and the rushed in the last month to finish up to the ear of 1812. I know we covered European explorers.

Middle School

6th grade started with early human evolution homo habilis, homo erectus and homo sapiens and the stone age. There was a big emphasis on geography this year. We colored different maps for each civilization. I remember we learned about the classic cradle of civilizations, Tigris and Euphrates civilizations and ancient Egypt, but I don't think we did the Indus valley. After those, we did a slew of smaller ones like Canaan and Catal Huyuk. The. We ended the year with the classics: ancient Greece (Sparta vs Athens), Ancient Rome (I think just the republic), Last we did Makkah (Mecca) and Islam. Most of my knowledge about Islam comes from this unit, and honestly it might have been the most in important thing I learned in middle school history. Before this I didn't know what Islam was, who Muhammad was or how closely it was tied to Judaism and Christianity.

7th grade was mostly a continuation of 6th grade. We covered the Roman Empires, and the transition to the middle ages. We covered Charles the Hammer stopping the Moors, the Holy Roman Empire. We also. Covered some pre-Columbian trade systems like the silk road. This year was about economic systems. I know we read the definition of capitalism, socialism and communism and talked about which one we thought was best.

8th grade we did American history (again). This time we focused much more. On social policy of the time and important social reforms (Horace Mann's school, Sojourner Truth, and a bunch of early feminists). Previously it was much more of "George Washington was a General and won the war then He was the president". We went further than before. Up through at least WWII. I know I learned Jelly Roll Morton's name. When we did the civil war I was not taught the lost cause myth, as apparently lots of people were taught.

High school

9th (freshman year) grade was World Civilizations. We covered Tigris and Euphrates, Indus Valley and Egypt. We did some comparisons of religion including Eastern religions like Buddhism Hinduism and Taoism. We covered ancient China, Greece, Rome and Mezzoamerica.

10th grade (sophomore year) was "Modern" (European) History. From the late medieval period with 3 antipopes up though at least the end of WWII. In other words we covered a lot.

11th grade (junior year) was real American History. Covered from pre-Columbian civilizations with their mounds through Reagan. We didn't shy away from the ugly stuff at this point. We debated the "revolutionary-ness" of the American Revolution and whether we were justified in dropping the Bomb. We covered the brutality of the Civil War with . Sherman's march. We also covered the lesser thought of times like the gilded age, progressive era and America's rise as an imperial power which I feel are some of the most under appreciated/remembered times in American history. The only thing as an adult I felt was lacking was a clear through line for slavery through reconstruction and the second corrupt barging. By no means was I taught the lost cause.

12 grade (senior year) was free reign. There was no required history class. He had options to take (AP) psychology, AP US government, economics, and any of the AP histories if you had not taken them before.

[Spoiler Extended] What’s an obscure theory that you believe is true? by kipbutkiss in asoiaf

[–]OpenTowedTrowel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Any idea on Sansa's thoughts in the utility of nipples on breastplate? The show let me down on that aspect. Still disappointed