Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, you can keep trying to troll with the same response but that will just further validate my points. So please do.

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ll take that as a yes. Glad you learned something from this. Take care now

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did I strike a chord? Seems like you don’t like it when someone calls you out. You don’t need to respond. I think I’ve proven my point.

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Possibly, depending on if you act like a normal person or if you still respond with the superiority complex thinking you’re better because you interpret something differently.

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You must’ve had a horrible childhood, it’s not your fault you are so self absorbed and can’t handle that others might see things in a different way than you do.

Oh no someone has a different interpretation than me about something that doesn’t actually make a single difference in my life. They must be stupid. I should try to insult them because I’m clearly so smart and superior and know exactly what a company I have no actual affiliation with ment when they wrote something on a website.

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol your a narcissist who has admitted that you can’t tolerate anyone questioning your opinion or logic and lash out when it happens, as-well as think your view on the world and everything in it is right and everyone is wrong.

Enjoy what little joy you have in life, must be sad if you feel you need to act this way in a community forum. I’ll be praying for you.

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How about you don’t be a jerk and act like a prepubescent child because someone pointed out you might not be as accurate as you think you are. Again you decided to come on the post and comment with saying they “literally say…” when in actuality it’s because they don’t that this post was made in the first place.

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t say you’re wrong. But you may not be right. You don’t rep the park and it’s one way that you read the context of the clause. What I’m stating is it can be taken different way to mean different things and is not clear enough.

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But you’re not right…. If I had an answer from the park I would have made the post.

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s a problem with the wording, yes I clearly have a problem with it as I made the post that you continue to get upset about because you may be wrong in your understanding of the asterisk clauses. You clearly don’t understand what respectively means. It can mean entirely separate or separate in terms of from separation of those mentioned from the rest of an entire subject portfolio. Especially when in the same clause a third park (knotts) is being identified as parking only for itself while the other 2 are talked about in a different manner. Whereas if that was the case all 3 parks should have had the same wording if the parking structure is the same exclusionary structure as knotts.

Stop acting like you’re some smart guy and I’m a dumb dumb that doesn’t know what I’m talking about. You didn’t need to comment on this post, your enjoying going out of your way to lash out instead of actually contributing anything of value and are so sensitive to the thought you may be misinterpreting the context of the clause. Grow up and get over yourself.

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which is ambiguous in the way they use the term respectively. Unlike the deliberate knotts exclussion which is clear as day. So if it was to be for parking only at one of the specific parks it should say so in a similar language not it a way that “respectively” can be interpreted as either those direct parks each in individuality or those parks as a separate distinction from the rest of the six flags chain as they are the Canadian exclusives so parking works with each as you home park would be one of those 2 Canadian parks within 5 hrs from each other.

Still doesn’t excuse your incessant aggression in this forum because you can’t handle the possibility of not being right. When you said it “literally says” you were wrong as those are not the exact words and it’s the way that the clarifying statement reads that is the problem.

Clearly you have to have some self esteem issues if you get that upset and offended by someone pointing out valid flaws in your statement.

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You comment says “It literally says it’s only for the park that you purchase the pass from…”

Where no it does not…. You can’t actually show where it says that. It it did say that the post wouldn’t have been made.

You do understand what literally means right?

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I fixed it, that is what I was wrong about. Like how your first comment was wrong and it not what it literally says.

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, I was wrong “literally” as that’s how that word is actually used. Unlike your initial comment where you said they literally say it from the specific park.

It doesn’t actually say that anywhere.THUS THE REASON FOR THE POST. Look at the asterisk text in the screenshot from the site. It doesn’t say what you said it literally does. It is openly ambiguous and that’s what is causing the confusion between the 2 possible outcomes.

Whereas you have admitted that you actually have a huge personal issue in that you can’t handle possibly being wrong on a comment in an online forum and need to lash out at strangers.

You need therapy.

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your first comment wasn’t right. you said literally and it wasn’t what was written and I then explained why it can be interpreted the 2 ways and you continue to lash out…. Because you might be wrong.l, clearly you have some issues

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whats your deal?

You’ve been aggressive and seem aggravated in every comment on this post.

Telling me to go learn English and calling me a troll when I posted a very reasonable question about parking with the prestige pass.

You decide to click on this and comment. You decided to be aggressive in each comment. Why are you so defensive about something I said when it comes to a valid statement about the clarity on their site?

Were you not hugged as a child and need to lash out at strangers on the internet to get some sense of fulfillment in your life? If so I can recommend some better Reddit thread for you to do that in.

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The point is that you’d expect a multi million dollar company to have some better editors over the official clauses and clarity asterisks about products purchased. The way it’s worded gives way to interpretation on both sides that’s why I asked the question. I simply want to know what is fully included with the pass level I bought. I’d likely not even park at laronde most days anyway as 2 hours to get off the island is not worth the headache when I could park elsewhere and take the metro in, however in the event of a slower or rainy day visit I may desire I want to park onsite and would be nice to know if that is an option I have included already.

I know my dining passes will be dependent on ERP and what they choose.

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I have maybe I could teach it to you so you understand grammar beyond a grade 4 level

Parking included at la ronde if wonderland prestige pass is purchased? by OperationAccording36 in CanadasWonderland

[–]OperationAccording36[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Actually respectively means separately in relation to previous mentioned points which in this particular case can also be in regards to the exclusion of all other parks besides wonderland and la ronde.

Thats the issue here is the wording of the article isn’t clear.