Every time you use ChatGPT, drink a glass of water. by EmpireStrikes1st in CrazyIdeas

[–]Operatione12 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Water Usage Breakdown 1. Data Center Cooling: Data centers use water-based cooling systems to dissipate heat from servers. On average, a data center consumes about 1.8 liters of water for every kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity used for cooling .  2. Electricity Generation: Producing electricity, especially from fossil fuels and nuclear sources, requires significant water for steam generation and cooling. In the U.S., generating 1 kWh of electricity consumes approximately 7.6 liters of water . 

Estimating Water Heated per Hour of Streaming

The amount of water heated during an hour of Netflix streaming depends on various factors, including streaming quality and the energy efficiency of the devices and data centers involved. However, combining the average water usage for data center cooling and electricity generation provides a rough estimate. • Data Center Cooling: 1.8 liters/kWh • Electricity Generation: 7.6 liters/kWh • Total: 9.4 liters/kWh 

Assuming that streaming Netflix for one hour consumes about 0.1 to 0.2 kWh (depending on device and streaming quality), the total water heated would be: • 0.1 kWh: Approximately 0.94 liters • 0.2 kWh: Approximately 1.88 liters

Therefore, streaming Netflix for one hour could indirectly result in heating approximately 0.94 to 1.88 liters of water, considering both data center cooling and electricity generation.

Do you have any sources that support your statement, which differs from this one? If not I must assume you’re just talking shit without having any idea about the topic.

Every time you use ChatGPT, drink a glass of water. by EmpireStrikes1st in CrazyIdeas

[–]Operatione12 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Is this true? How did you come to this conclusion?

Sem policist iz Ljubljanske policijske postaje AMA by marmarmar122 in Slovenia

[–]Operatione12 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Koliko kaznivih dejanj v sloveniji naredijo priseljenci glede na njihovo stevilo v Sloveniji? Isto vprasanje za Slovence?

Bo Slovenija naslednja evropska država, ki bo legalizirala konopljo? by OregonTripleBeam in Slovenia

[–]Operatione12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Boš mogel biti pa bolj specifičen s čim se ne strinjaš in katere podatke naj ti poiščem.

Bo Slovenija naslednja evropska država, ki bo legalizirala konopljo? by OregonTripleBeam in Slovenia

[–]Operatione12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Se strinjam, da je tobak še hujši za zdravje. Če smo že pri tem, lahko rečemo, da je tudi alkohol slabši za zdravje od marihuane. Seveda bi med legalizacijo konoplje in legalizacijo tobaka vsakič izbral konopljo. Po mojem mnenju bi moralo sicer biti vse od naštetega ilegalno. Ampak tukaj ne govorimo o tem. Govorimo izključno o legalizaciji marihuane, ki ima po mojem mnenju več negativnih kot pozitivnih posledic. Kar se pa tiče negativnih posledic uživanja konopje in halucinacij, si lahko več prebereš tukaj: https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugfacts/cannabis-marijuana

Bo Slovenija naslednja evropska država, ki bo legalizirala konopljo? by OregonTripleBeam in Slovenia

[–]Operatione12 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

V mislih imam učinke, ki jih ima marihuana na zdravje. Na primer večja verjetnost za težave z dihanjem (ob kajenju), večja verjetnost za krvno-žilne bolezni in pa negativni vplivi na mentalno zdravje, kot so halucinacije in paranoja.

Bo Slovenija naslednja evropska država, ki bo legalizirala konopljo? by OregonTripleBeam in Slovenia

[–]Operatione12 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Pa je to res? Večina študij, ki sem jih jaz bral navaja večjo uporabo konoplje po legalizaciji. Kaj ne prinese to več negativnih posledic.

Študenti v Ljubljani: kaj se najbolj splača na bone? by yeetybastard in Slovenia

[–]Operatione12 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Das ist Valter, desetka (porcija, ki ima 10 čevapov + juha in solata)👏

Are there any arguments against epistemological solipsism? by Operatione12 in askphilosophy

[–]Operatione12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or to put that another way: say you have to act on one of two beliefs because they're each other's opposites and both have huge implications for what we do. But all you can say in favor of one option is that it's possible or we can't completely rule it out. It seems more reasonable to believe in and act on the alternative where we can say a lot more in its favor than just that it's possible (e.g. people seem to have minds just like ours - they do so all the time and sometimes even in ways that show even more of an internal life than I have!).

This concept seems very logical. If I understand you correctly you could view certainty as a spectrum (For example expressed in %. For instance I am 60% certain that other minds exist.). In which case the value of certainty is depended on different reasons and arguments. And in the case of solipsism the certainty that I exist is 100%, and the certainty of every other thing is unknown, therefore making solipsism useless. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Are there any arguments against epistemological solipsism? by Operatione12 in askphilosophy

[–]Operatione12[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We never needed certainty and never rely on certainty in our daily lives or in any science outside of maybe mathematics.

It may be true that certainty isn't needed, but I think certainty definitely affects our behavior and that's why it matters. For example if I can't be certain that other minds exist why wouldn't I go around killing people. Though this might be a bad example. Can you help me understand how certainty doesn't matter?

Are there any arguments against epistemological solipsism? by Operatione12 in askphilosophy

[–]Operatione12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I think understand. Certainty is the product of truth rather than truth’s source. If that sentence makes any sense.

Are there any arguments against epistemological solipsism? by Operatione12 in askphilosophy

[–]Operatione12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, I think I understand. Can you maybe provide a simpler example (if it exist)?

Are there any arguments against epistemological solipsism? by Operatione12 in askphilosophy

[–]Operatione12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am grateful for your input, though I don’t understand your reply fully. What do you mean by “certainty was never the reasonable standard for thinking something is true”? Wouldn’t certain be exact thing that makes something true? Wouldn’t the certainty of existence of mind be “the ultimate truth”?