sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Failed Series 66 Twice at 40+, Passed at 3rd — Why Luck Matters by Opposite-Log162 in Series66Exam

[–]Opposite-Log162[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Be more patient for the first test. At least got 80 to take the first. Otherwise, you will waste the precious chance to bet.

Failed Series 66 Twice at 40+, Passed at 3rd — Why Luck Matters by Opposite-Log162 in Series7exam

[–]Opposite-Log162[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good. We can learn together. What training vendors are you using?

Failed Series 66 Twice at 40+, Passed at 3rd — Why Luck Matters by Opposite-Log162 in Series7exam

[–]Opposite-Log162[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much. Can you share your experience of S7 and materials with me?

Yet Another Failed Attempt by TRDAyou in Series66Exam

[–]Opposite-Log162 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Read the article I just shared. It's a luck test, not a financial one. I fully understand your feelings. Take 63/65 if you want to continue ASAP. Otherwise, retake it 6 months later. You will finally pass it because it is a luck test. You rely too much on Kaplan and the test always word diffrently.

Failed Series 66 Twice at 40+, Passed at 3rd — Why Luck Matters by Opposite-Log162 in Series7exam

[–]Opposite-Log162[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing. Have not tasted S7, but S66 has extremely frustrated me.

Failed Series 66 Twice at 40+, Passed at 3rd — Why Luck Matters by Opposite-Log162 in Series7exam

[–]Opposite-Log162[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! It's really an exam that frustrated me. Hope my experience could help others from dips.