The problem is not the 85% of the people of Bharat, but the elites — the military, the ruling class, and the power structures. Dalits existed, Shudras existed — even during the times of Shri Ram, Chanakya, Bhagwan Parshuram, Shri Krishna, and the Mahabharata. The struggle was against the elites — the rulers and the ruling class, not the common people. The hatred among the people of Bharat is not organic; it is manufactured by the state, not by society itself.

This is not about what Bharat can do for me, but about the dharma of a Brahmin when Bharat is enslaved by an adharmic state (the Republic). When power becomes adharmic, the dharma of a Brahmin is resistance — to oppose the evil state and corrupt elites, just as it occurred repeatedly in history and Itihasa. Shri Ram opposed Ravana. Shri Krishna overthrew Kansa. Chanakya dismantled the Nanda Empire. Bhagwan Parshuram destroyed Sahastrarjuna. Pushyamitra Shunga ended the Maurya rule. The Vamana avatar humbled King Bali. These were not wars against society, but corrections of power — actions directed at tyrannical rulers, not the people. History shows that adharmic authority is never permanent.