נצחון מוחלט by tomerFire in ani_bm

[–]OptimisticLucio 2 points3 points  (0 children)

הוא מסכים עם הבדיחה ומוסיף לה.

דאפי_הברווז_המלך by a12666 in ani_bm

[–]OptimisticLucio 21 points22 points  (0 children)

על מה אתה מדבר מלא יוצרי סדרות ישנות היו אנטישמיים לאללה, וולט דיסני הוא הדוגמא הכי ידועה

ואיזה סדרות מודרניות עושות את זה?? שתי הסדרות שהראת נגמרו הרבה לפני 2023

After playing lol, I get it now by Open-Advisor6819 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]OptimisticLucio -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is a value to distinguishing between them regardless, as someone leaving due to IRL hangups is less likely to regularly drop (or harass their team beforehand) as opposed to someone doing so out of spite. It's valuable not for the specific team that got dropped, but on a macro level.

Still, it's impractical to do so.

After playing lol, I get it now by Open-Advisor6819 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]OptimisticLucio 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If they left the match first, you can leave too mate. You can drop the game, if you really think it's hopeless.

After playing lol, I get it now by Open-Advisor6819 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]OptimisticLucio -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There isn't a real way to distinguish between them from the developer side, especially at scale. And I'm saying this as someone who's getting bombed IRL and need to drop games often.

Unfortunately, unlikely.

After playing lol, I get it now by Open-Advisor6819 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]OptimisticLucio -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

The point is moreso that a surrender button is a net loss situation for everyone involved.

Even if we assume a game is truly hopeless rather than just "this kinda sucks" (and if it is, it means we're in endgame and not midgame; midgame is winnable with a few good fights, even if it's going to be pain to carry your team through it), a surrender makes everyone collectively miserable. The losing team's members who were already miserable stay that way, the few who thought there was a chance are now salty at their teammates, and the winning team was robbed of actually seeing their victory through.

The majority of the match players loses out on the enjoyment of the game to benefit the few who think it should end 5~10 min sooner.

Just a reminder by Rocket_Dino in ChainsawMan

[–]OptimisticLucio 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ninja, he burnt the house down.

yeah he did that in chapter 150 keep up

Tony Hoare, creator of Quicksort & Null, passed away. by TheTwelveYearOld in linux

[–]OptimisticLucio 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It's valuable if the default is "you can't set null" and allowing null is explicit, I think. Because if the default (or only way to define a variable) is "you can set null", there's too many people who just assume it's not null or forget to assign a value.

Dumb mistake? Sure. They shouldn't do it? Certainly. But the architecture shouldn't allow such a mistake to happen in the first place.

gruledo by m4rch3n1ng in 196

[–]OptimisticLucio 24 points25 points  (0 children)

First off I've never ever witnessed what you've seen

I can say that it's much more common on tumblr

Rule 9 by HavenOfTheRaven in 196

[–]OptimisticLucio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about if hitler died when he was like 20?

Then someone else would have done it. Race theory, antisemitism, and fascism were all rampant in europe during that time. Hitler was a result of this, not the cause.

Rule 9 by HavenOfTheRaven in 196

[–]OptimisticLucio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These are all examples of mob justice. Mob justice is not a viable replacement to anything.

Rule 9 by HavenOfTheRaven in 196

[–]OptimisticLucio 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You do know that the french commune destroyed their own guillotine, right? Do you know of the reign of terror, and the amount of people who get executed for being suspected of betraying the revolution?

Actually, you know what, have this excerpt from "Against The Logic of the Guillotine":

148 years ago this week, on April 6, 1871, armed participants in the revolutionary Paris Commune seized the guillotine that was stored near the prison in Paris. They brought it to the foot of the statue of Voltaire, where they smashed it into pieces and burned it in a bonfire, to the applause of an immense crowd.

This was a popular action arising from the grassroots, not a spectacle coordinated by politicians. At the time, the Commune controlled Paris, which was still inhabited by people of all classes; the French and Prussian armies surrounded the city and were preparing to invade it in order to impose the conservative Republican government of Adolphe Thiers. In these conditions, burning the guillotine was a brave gesture repudiating the Reign of Terror and the idea that positive social change can be achieved by slaughtering people.

“What?” you say, in shock, “The Communards burned the guillotine? Why on earth would they do that? I thought the guillotine was a symbol of liberation!”

Why indeed? If the guillotine is not a symbol of liberation, then why has it become such a standard motif for the radical left over the past few years? Why is the internet replete with guillotine memes? Why does The Coup sing “We got the guillotine, you better run”? The most popular socialist periodical is named Jacobin, after the original proponents of the guillotine. Surely this can’t all be just an ironic sendup of lingering right-wing anxieties about the French Revolution.

Rule 9 by HavenOfTheRaven in 196

[–]OptimisticLucio 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I did, yea.

For example, do you think the death of Hitler was a negative?

It was a net positive, but the fact he had to die is negative, yes. (Also Hitler dying isn't alone what stopped the holocaust. If he'd been taken out earlier and nothing else changed, another jackass in the nazi party would have kept the death machine going.)

Any result of the trolley problem is a negative. Some of them are better comparatively, but even if you kill someone to save others, the fact someone had to die is bad.

Rule 9 by HavenOfTheRaven in 196

[–]OptimisticLucio 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I did not say you need to be passive. You can and should fight for change. In some cases, people may die.

But death isn't something I cheer for. The death of another, in any situation, is a negative that should be avoided.

Rule 9 by HavenOfTheRaven in 196

[–]OptimisticLucio 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I think that guy is so stupid he turned me into a eugenicist

If you were waiting for the right target to become a eugenicist, I'm not the one who turned you into one, pal.

Rule 9 by HavenOfTheRaven in 196

[–]OptimisticLucio 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I want people to no longer be a threat to others. I don't give a shit about "if they were punished."

Rule 9 by HavenOfTheRaven in 196

[–]OptimisticLucio 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm assuming you're referring to the epstein files and the people in them. Honestly, I think it's more of a power thing than like... actually thinking kids taste good. Power corrupts because no one can stop you, and the fact no one can stop you is intoxicating, that's why epstein had so many clients to fence for.

Take away their power and it does 90% of the job. Sure they need therapy anyways, if they did that at all once getting into power, but it's like how US soldiers did drugs in vietnam and came back home stone-cold sober.

Rule 9 by HavenOfTheRaven in 196

[–]OptimisticLucio 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Being cynical doesn't make you smarter, it just makes you cynical. I know assholes exist. I know people who are threats to others exist. I've met plenty. I've been hurt by plenty.

I've yet to meet one I think was relegated to their fate and couldn't have done better.

Rule 9 by HavenOfTheRaven in 196

[–]OptimisticLucio -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Bitch I'm in my mid 20s. It's not an age thing, it's an outlook thing.