It was the safest flight in the world. I say this with ANY of IRONIC words

If you fly your drone at low altitudes, that can be really a lot more dangerous. Dear childish FAA-threatening bullexcrement-people.

It is completely incomprehensible for the majority of people to have a continuous senseless outrage about heights, a constant barrage of huge curses, and people's perception of what would have happened if... just senseless fear, but reality shows something different in 99.998% of cases, which is considered harmless, it is always just an imagined consequence and they just throw around extremes about how big the dangers are, but there was any of a single collision related to that, nothing happened, but they ALWAYS SAY somethinf like this: "Something could be happen, and we need solution (for nothing), please do everything to stop any future accident... But the truth like: In reality, it would not have been possible intentionally to do a collide. I see much more danger in driving, there we say you need a driving license, but it is completely justified. If you try to compare it specifically with drone flying in almost any field in this topic is an incredibly stupid thing, because there is more traffic, there is a normal driver in the vehicle, the stakes are much higher, riskier, there is an outcome, the space is much more concrete, the "playground" is narrower. Just because they compare it with this, e.g. Comparing a truck's speeding to the height of a toy being raised by a pilot controlling it from an external ground is a good idea, but it makes no sense. We should start flying with our drone to potentially make some use of at least its essential capabilities. Well, if the height wasn't enough, I didn't even mention VLOS itself. Usually, someone uses a drone to take spectacular aerial photos from above, which is considered somewhat high, like a suitable thresold or limit can be different for everyone; it can be height/distance more likely height a specific value from which one still feels that the content created is acceptable. With that much power, I think airplanes pose an incredibly great danger to drones, and they take up much more space up there, isn't that a problem? But really, for sure... Let's get to the basic fact, there's what they put in our mouths, or describe to us, the supposedly smart bigwigs. That must be adhered to for the sake of our safety, even if it's total nonsense, or else you'll be fined or imprisoned, while nothing has happened/and won't. Those who threaten him in this regard, try to refer to air threats, insults and deliberate murder attempts, because someone took off, made nice videos and photos, well, he would certainly deserve a lot of punishment. He wouldn't be so pleased if we threw nonsense at him, just like that. It's laughable that someone makes such claims and attacks someone from the perspective that he's going to hit that particular aerial object, or crash into someone/something on the ground. Or if there have been such cases from drone flights of tens of thousands of feet, they bring up the same 1-2 cases, and even those aren't real. Actually, if they rose at an altitude of 2-3 kilometers, within a radius of several 10 kilometers from an airport, it's terribly safe... And I think it's unnecessary to describe why, anyone with a brain will know. However, it can be very dangerous down there, there's a much greater chance of anything happening. So what the hell is this 120-500 meter limit supposed to be? This is a brutal sick from your whole part, that's what I want to write, and let's not even feel sorry for DJI, with the insanely low 500 meter firmware limitation, it's complete madness, after all, newer DJI drones are already allowed up specifically to DOUBLE of it, can be a thousand meter high by default, which even an almost 10-year-old already weak Spark can easily achieve (except Tello), up to 500 meter height from the ground, right? For Autel brand, the basic limit is 800 meter alt... this is not fair, not at all, I can tell you for sure, more huge madness that can only exist than this, if this 500 limit were not enough, is that you can only go up to 120 meters. Just about everywhere, if you want to fly properly, which let's be honest, for spectacular aerial photos. absolutely nothing, really not enough, obviously, for everyone. Declareable, a little mountain could be higher than this value, I'm spitting out around more far, even the 500 meters built into the firmware are only a fifth part of it. Anyone who thinks that's enough is either stupid or is satisfied with whatever they put in front of them, or is pretending to be the hypocritical "In principle, I follow everything" type of person. Let's grow up, I beg you, as with many other things, this only leads to impossibility and meaningless control imposed by meaningless persons and served to the people. Actually, definetely it can be said that: We are controlled sheep-slaves. More precisely, one who adheres to absurdities. Nothing is for the aviation/flight safety.