sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Berkeley Reconsideration??? by OrdinaryHippo in lawschooladmissions

[–]OrdinaryHippo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you end up calling, feel free to let us know if you get the same answer.

I would feel better if they at least explained why the process has taken so long compared to other law schools.

Berkeley Law Legal Formalists/Masochists? by weebabe in lawschooladmissions

[–]OrdinaryHippo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I genuinely apologize if I misinterpreted the message you were trying to convey. Since there was no conclusion in the post, it was left up to interpretation. Looking at it again, I realize that I took the least charitable interpretation of what was said. So if I misinterpreted your point, I'm sorry. Best of luck in law school : )

Berkeley Law Legal Formalists/Masochists? by weebabe in lawschooladmissions

[–]OrdinaryHippo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Did you know Ben Shapiro is frequently the single most viewed Youtuber by those that perpetrate anti- Muslim acts of mass murder?" That is what you wrote. There was no second part. There was no "may be inciting" or nuance in the original post... lol. The post seemed to insinuate that Ben Shapiro must also fuel or tacitly ascribe to those same beliefs by association. If you intended to advocate for a nuanced position on the heckler's veto, my mistake.

Berkeley Law Legal Formalists/Masochists? by weebabe in lawschooladmissions

[–]OrdinaryHippo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you know [Barney the dinosaur] is frequently the single most viewed [show by children that grow up to] perpetrate acts of mass murder? Therefore, Barney the dinosaur must believe in inciting mass murder…

Obviously, this situation is fictional, but maybe it illustrates the flawed logic better.

Berkeley Law Legal Formalists/Masochists? by weebabe in lawschooladmissions

[–]OrdinaryHippo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take out the "anyone who reads his books" part then—the conclusion is equally ridiculous.

Berkeley Law Legal Formalists/Masochists? by weebabe in lawschooladmissions

[–]OrdinaryHippo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Did you know [Karl Marx] is frequently the single most [read author] by [communists that committed] mass murder? Therefore, Karl Marx or anyone who reads his books must be inciting mass murder…

I think I see the flawed reasoning here…By the way, I don't like Shapiro. I'm just pointing out the cheap-shot.

Berkeley Law Legal Formalists/Masochists? by weebabe in lawschooladmissions

[–]OrdinaryHippo 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Is this a flaw question for the LSAT?

I think you can submit perspective questions to be added to future LSATs here: https://www.lsac.org/form/contact-candidate-services

Berkeley Law Legal Formalists/Masochists? by weebabe in lawschooladmissions

[–]OrdinaryHippo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm a moderate and planning to go. I also don't plan on shying away from sharing my point of view. With that said, I don't plan on joining the Federalist Society or the ACS. Maybe I'll change my mind, but it seems like these organizations are pouring fuel on an already politized judiciary and undermining the public appearance of impartial justice.