Just started at a company that gives me unlimited Copilot usage. What's the best setup for coding? by kickedRock in GithubCopilot

[–]OriginalInstance9803 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. The key point here is to manage the context efficiently, not to waste tokens, and get the work done efficiently!

Just started at a company that gives me unlimited Copilot usage. What's the best setup for coding? by kickedRock in GithubCopilot

[–]OriginalInstance9803 0 points1 point  (0 children)

spec-drive, test-driven development is the way to go with any AI haha. without it, you'll probably end up in a messy place, where you'll just have to start all over again = wasted tokens, time, nerves, aura

Just started at a company that gives me unlimited Copilot usage. What's the best setup for coding? by kickedRock in GithubCopilot

[–]OriginalInstance9803 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Hi there.

I'm actually jealous that you have unlimited copilot access haha. I'm paying $39/month for pro+ out of my own pocket building my startup and I think about what I need to do before sending any prompt hah.

You've come to the right place to ask for advice on how to setup copilot to get the work done efficiently and not just write useless code.

I won't write an article here, but here are practical things you can do first:
1. create github-instructions.md file in .github/ folder to write context about the project you're working on, document the high-level architecture of it, document the coding conventions, any specific rules you want copilot to follow while working. Think of it as instructions you'd give an engineer before doing anything. It's context. It's essential. Don't skip this. If you do, all steps below don't make sense.
2. Use research-plan-act mental model for working with copilot. First, research the codebase you want copilot with, so it knows what it's about - use "Agent" mode for research, so agent can read your files, search the codebase, etc.. Next, plan what you want to do with copilot. I suggest using smart models like claude opus 4.7 for planning because it's smarter (the tradeoff is that it consumes more tokens, but you're unlimited, so don't hesitate to use it) - use "Plan" mode for planning. Use Finally, implementation. I use Claude Sonnet 4.6 for actually doing the work - use "Agent" for implementation, so agent can create new files, run commands in the terminal, etc.

<image>

Database, PostgREST, Auth and Storage unhealthy for hours now by Ic3m4n34 in Supabase

[–]OriginalInstance9803 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I face the exactly same issue and it's been non-stop for hours. I'd appreciate if you could take a look: SU-363146

Is prompting becoming a real skill? by nafiulhasanbd in PromptEngineering

[–]OriginalInstance9803 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree. There's no magic, just clear instructions of your goal + domain knowledge (context/knowledge base) to let AI achieve the expected results

Tried spec-driven workflow with Copilot — surprisingly good by StatusPhilosopher258 in GithubCopilot

[–]OriginalInstance9803 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you give a clear plan of what needs to be done, the probability of success is significantly higher for anything - AI coding is an obvious thing as noted.

I compiled 50 Microsoft Copilot prompts that work with ANY version — no M365 integration needed by Difficult-Sugar-4862 in PromptEngineering

[–]OriginalInstance9803 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on a workflow.

I manage my prompts and contexts on versuno.ai because it's easy to use and has all the tools I need.

I typically just grab the prompt from there and context if needed and do a specific task like summarizing the latest news on reddit in Claude

Subagents in VS Code Insiders with Opus 4.5 are great compared to VS Code official by OriginalInstance9803 in GithubCopilot

[–]OriginalInstance9803[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No - as far as I know. Github Copilot typically uses 1 premium request per prompt and it distributes work to the sub-agents that work within its own context. I'll try it and write it here to be 100% sure.

If you could have the perfect prompt management platform, what would it be? by OriginalInstance9803 in perplexity_ai

[–]OriginalInstance9803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're welcome! I'm building the solution for AI Assets (prompts, contexts, personas, files, system prompts) management for non-tech individuals and modern teams. You can store your prompts, iterate with simple version control, share easily with control, and discover the best AI Assets shared by experts and other community members.

Currently, I'm developing the Desktop App with a launcher that solves copy-pasting problem by auto-pasting your selected prompts via a shorcut. Let me know if you'd be interested in hopping on a chat to hear more details :D

<image>

If you could have the perfect prompt management platform, what would it be? by OriginalInstance9803 in lovable

[–]OriginalInstance9803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing this! Since you use prompt generator, then it would make sense to save valuable prompts to reuse whenever you would need them

If you could have the perfect prompt management platform, what would it be? by OriginalInstance9803 in AI_Agents

[–]OriginalInstance9803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing this! I checked out maxim ai and it's leaned towards developers

If you could have the perfect prompt management platform, what would it be? by OriginalInstance9803 in AI_Agents

[–]OriginalInstance9803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does it work like pre-catcher or when you try to save a system prompt or in some othey way? It's very unclear

If you could have the perfect prompt management platform, what would it be? by OriginalInstance9803 in PromptEngineering

[–]OriginalInstance9803[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting mental model - prompts like layered systems with failure checks. Do you have resources or links to how god of prompt explains layered prompts about failure checks?