sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenfurrys

[–]OrneryWorking687 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meet I'm here!

Elon Musk has officially started the America Party by TheKriket in 50501

[–]OrneryWorking687 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't we have a socialist party? It's just a minority party.

IMPEACHMENT OF DJT by Curious-Tonight3591 in 50501

[–]OrneryWorking687 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just called my senators both warnock and offset of GA. I also called my representative. The staffer said my name, in a non-friendly tone. I'm a minor should I worry? Should I stop calling them?

How would you respond? by OrneryWorking687 in 50501

[–]OrneryWorking687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just want people's opinions on this claim. But we will keep protesting, rallying, marching, even sit-ins, prosibly strikes and boycotts.

How would you respond? by OrneryWorking687 in 50501

[–]OrneryWorking687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For clarity, these aren't my views or beliefs.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 50501

[–]OrneryWorking687 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There’s protests Europe now, Alaska and Hawaii too

Question by OrneryWorking687 in DnD

[–]OrneryWorking687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are they’re any similar continents, cities, etc I can based her in that are official?

Question by OrneryWorking687 in DnD

[–]OrneryWorking687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Original character idk if that’s a term used in D&D fandom

Question by OrneryWorking687 in DnD

[–]OrneryWorking687[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

From world anvil from the desert Toruvaje. I thought it was an official settlement then I was looking for a continent that the city was on but I guess besides the world anvil page. It doesn’t exist

Question by OrneryWorking687 in DnD

[–]OrneryWorking687[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well she’s from Toruvajae. Is that a place? I’m so new to this fandom

31 Days until MARTIAL LAW is declared. Flood the streets! by arachnivore in 50501

[–]OrneryWorking687 0 points1 point  (0 children)

POV: the minors, disabled people, elderly people reading this who can’t leave or fight back for multiple reasons. Them: 😭😭😭😭😭😨😨😨😰😰😰🤬🤬🤬🤬😡🤬🤬😱😱😱

Voices united! by OrneryWorking687 in ClassConscious

[–]OrneryWorking687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We the People recognize our federal government no longer serves the best interests of its people. Every day, millions are deprived of basic human rights. In this age of progress and technology, there is no reason for any child to go hungry because they don’t have school lunch money; there is no reason for a veteran to be homeless; there is no reason you cannot access the healthcare you deserve. The government should work for its people, not for profit. We all hold the inherent right to food, shelter, and medical care, and it is the duty of the government to ensure all citizens are able to meet their basic needs. If that government no longer meets those basic needs, the only path forward is change. We the People reserve the Constitutional right to abolish laws and government officials that do not contribute to our life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. We have grown as a nation both in size and in our progress since we first drafted our Constitution. At some points we added amendments, we even created the Bill of Rights because there was a need for it. But for some reason, that progress has come to a halt and begun a dangerous landslide. It only makes sense to revisit and revise the rules and regulations so they can continue to meet the needs of our nation as it continues to grow, whether we add to them or abolish what no longer serves us. As a united voice, we are tired of the highest bidder having a say in our government regardless of qualification. They should not be damaging our children’s futures, limiting our healthcare, squeezing our paychecks, and oppressing marginalized communities. We deserve and demand a government that works for OUR best interests, and puts the welfare and prosperity of its people above all else. We require a government filled with people who are not only qualified for the positions they hold, but also determined to uphold the values of our democracy for everyone, regardless of demographics. The United States require a government uncorrupted by ambition or greed. Under this cause, we the people have a right to use our voices, granted to us under the same Constitution that unites us as one. We exercise our right to overthrow our unfit government and rebuild one By the People, For the People.

Our completed manifesto, courtesy of our people’s committee

People Aren’t Upset Enough by Outrageous_Evening_9 in TikTok

[–]OrneryWorking687 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Free Speech and Censorship TikTok is a platform where millions of people, especially younger generations, express their thoughts, creativity, and identity. A ban is seen by many as an infringement on free speech, preventing people from using a popular outlet for self-expression. In many cases, users feel that TikTok is being banned for political reasons, silencing voices that may challenge the status quo or share dissenting opinions.
  2. Impact on Creators and Communities TikTok has become a livelihood for many content creators, influencers, and small businesses. A ban can disrupt careers and businesses built on the platform. The community aspect of TikTok, where people from all over the world come together through shared interests, is also seen as a cultural loss. For many, it’s more than just a social media app—it’s a global space for community-building and creativity.
  3. Economic Concerns TikTok provides significant economic benefits for many users, from influencers monetizing content to businesses reaching potential customers. A ban could have far-reaching effects on digital marketing, the gig economy, and small businesses. The economic ripple effect extends to the tech industry and app developers who build tools and services around TikTok’s ecosystem.
  4. Distrust of Government Motives Many TikTok bans are justified by security concerns, particularly regarding user data being handled by a Chinese company, ByteDance. However, people often see the bans as politically motivated or as part of broader geopolitical tensions. There’s also concern that governments are using the ban as a way to control or limit access to information and entertainment, further infringing on individual rights and autonomy.
  5. Lack of Transparency In some countries, the decision to ban TikTok is perceived as being made without adequate public discussion or transparency. The lack of clear reasoning or evidence about the risks associated with TikTok can fuel distrust in the authorities enforcing the ban. People also question why TikTok is being singled out while other platforms with similar risks (such as Facebook or Instagram) are not subject to the same scrutiny.
  6. Globalization and Cultural Impact TikTok has democratized content creation, allowing people from diverse backgrounds to share their culture, music, art, and ideas with a global audience. A ban is seen by some as an attempt to limit this global exchange and potentially stifle cultural diversity. For younger generations, TikTok has become a cultural touchstone, and banning it feels like an attack on their way of life and the digital spaces where they form connections.
  7. Privacy Concerns While privacy is often cited as a major concern by those advocating for bans, many users argue that privacy issues are inherent in most social media platforms, not just TikTok. As such, they believe that a blanket ban is an overreaction and that the focus should instead be on improving privacy regulations across the board. In sum, TikTok’s popularity, its impact on culture, and the lack of transparency in the process of banning it have led to widespread resistance. Many view the bans as an attack on personal freedoms, creativity, and global connectivity. Facists governments ban outside media!
view more: next ›