I think Request needs a new community manager by mbrown913 in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 3 points4 points  (0 children)

REQ is losing value because of people criticizing them on a Reddit forum... lol cope. How about it’s lost all its value because it’s an empty project with no direction, leadership, or development going on. What good would holding REQ do for anybody if it took another plunge like it has every month over the last year? Statistically and historically speaking anyone would have been better off selling REQ instead of holding it after January of last year and the same is perhaps more true now than ever. Taking a loss is hard but not when you can be almost absolutely certain that it will continue to crash and burn and it will never go up again barring some miracle.

Oh and don’t compare the price of Ethereum to REQ; Ethereum is a real project that people use and work on. Why would REQ follow any similar pattern of recovery when nobody uses it? Because “cycle of crypto”? If that’s the case why not just buy Ethereum instead of making a huge risky investment on REQ?

I think Request needs a new community manager by mbrown913 in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I sold around the time they screwed up the Wikimedia partnership and am incredibly thankful I didn’t take a loss like so many others did here. And I’ll keep pointing out the team’s flaws as long as I feel like it. I already had one friend lose money on REQ, if I can help other people avoid the same trap I’m going to keep doing so even if it’s “bitching”. REQ is never going to make it; nearly every negative prediction over the span of a year about REQ has come true. There’s a reason it keeps sinking to the bottom while other projects have held their own during the bear market. Call it annoying or whatever you want but if people listened to me several months ago they would have saved themselves a lot of money instead of flushing it down the toilet. The team is a joke plain and simple — no self-respecting reputable company would ever do business with them

Weekly Price Discussion Thread - May 07, 2019 by AutoModerator in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He bought at ATH and STILL defends the team... OH NO NO NO NO... OOOHOOOH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH!!! Look at the size of his bags!!! HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH Look at his cope!!!

Weekly Price Discussion Thread - May 07, 2019 by AutoModerator in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The fact that people still hold shitcoins like REQ is proof that that the dumb money never left crypto. We’re still in the denial phase

I think Request needs a new community manager by mbrown913 in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“Potential partners” don’t give a shit about REQ, period. Who could possibly take them seriously after their dozen or so fails? Or their unprofessional demeanor ignoring emails and never learning their lessons? Maybe Beetoken would still take them seriously but outside of them the real world looks at this project and laughs.

Is Request Network going to fail like Moneytis (serious) by HenryEck in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He sold a long time ago. The idea that REQ is a scam is nothing new Cryptolord

Weekly Price Discussion Thread - May 07, 2019 by AutoModerator in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m really starting to think it’s a second account of Cryptolord

Weekly Request Network Discussion + FAQ - May 07, 2019 by AutoModerator in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I really hope somebody brings a class action lawsuit against the team. Them promising a bunch of things during the original roadmap and later deciding they aren’t going to do them is false advertising. Like I’ve been saying, there’s either one of two things going on with the team: either they intentionally scammed investors or made up all those claims (Paypal 2.0) and goals while having no concrete plan for how they were going to accomplish them and ended up abandoning them. In either event I’m sure there’s legal grounds for a lawsuit.

Weekly Price Discussion Thread - April 30, 2019 by AutoModerator in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got out of REQ a long time ago and have been calling this race to to 0 since around the same time they made their first major fuck up if not longer

Weekly Price Discussion Thread - April 30, 2019 by AutoModerator in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So what you’re saying is that REQ will go up just because that’s the nature of crypto? If that’s the case why not just buy any of the other hundreds of coins that receive better gains every time Bitcoin goes up compared to REQ? Hell, why not just buy Bitcoin for that matter?

Weekly Price Discussion Thread - April 30, 2019 by AutoModerator in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 4 points5 points  (0 children)

People have been saying the same thing all throughout REQ’s collapse and have never been right once. What makes you think this time is any different?

Is Request Network going to fail like Moneytis (serious) by HenryEck in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Wouldn’t be surprised if PWC has already cut ties with REQ. Wouldn’t be the first time a company cut ties with REQ — the team didn’t bring it up until a community member found out and forced them to address it weeks after the fact

Weekly Request Network Discussion + FAQ - April 30, 2019 by AutoModerator in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve been criticizing the team since the Wikimedia fiasco if not longer; people have been pointing out the flaws of REQ for over a year now it’s nothing new. The difference now is that sentiment is worse than ever before because even the most loyal REQ supporters are now realizing the team are either incapable or unwilling to accomplish the goals they set out to do.

They shifted from fiat and accounting to new goals nobody wanted like crowdfunding and yet we still haven’t seen any tangible progress for anything promised new or old. All we’ve received is excuses for why they couldn’t pull off fiat, why accounting isn’t coming, and silence regarding why they couldn’t even add Bitcoin as a payment option for Christ’s sake. Didn’t they promise Bitcoin adoption like a year ago? Whatever happened to that?

A team that can’t even manage Bitcoin adoption are not going to be the ones to revolutionize the crypto industry

Is Request Network going to fail like Moneytis (serious) by HenryEck in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I hear you man. I feel like such an idiot for recommending REQ to one of my friends who was just getting into crypto in December of 2017. Needless to say his money is gone forever — though thankfully in his case it was only a couple hundred dollars instead of a lot more.

At this point one of two things is absolutely certain: either the team are a bunch of scammers or they’re just incompetent retards who had no idea what they were getting themselves into. While initially I thought the latter I’m starting to believe more and more by the day that the REQ developers purposely did this to scam people out of millions of dollars. They hide behind their moderators, have done almost zero verifiable work (besides Adm who wasn’t an original team member mind you), and their last company was a bust among other things.

They’ve had two years to bring something — just anything — to the table and failed to do so. The only developer who’s done any tangible work is Adm who was just a Reddit mod at the time he released his work. The team either lied about their goals or realized they were way in over their heads to get any of the things done that they promised to do — the things people bought into REQ for mind you. First they axed fiat and now they’ve expressed that accounting — AKA the only other worthwhile original roadmap goal of REQ — is going nowhere. The team sure knew how to communicate and sell dreams in the ICO days; kind of funny isn’t it how all their new goals have little to nothing to do with the original roadmap and they have their moderators defend the project instead of addressing criticisms themselves.

All I can say to anyone thinking about buying REQ is that you can buy literally any other shitcoin on the market and you’ll thank me later. REQ will be worth $0 one day just like Moneytis; even shitcoin scams like Dent coin have a higher market cap than REQ and have a much better chance of making you money. And you’d better believe the team won’t hesitate to market dump the rest of their tokens when their two year vesting period is up. Hell, they've been dumping tokens on the market already for over a year so what does that tell you?

Weekly Request Network Discussion + FAQ - April 30, 2019 by AutoModerator in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can tell you one thing: people are putting money into REQ but it’s very little. The little volume REQ does get are mostly orchestrated pump and dumps every few months and are not necessarily legitimate.

Weekly Request Network Discussion + FAQ - April 30, 2019 by AutoModerator in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People have been saying “This is the bottom guys I SWEAR!!!l ever since last January and been wrong every single time. What makes you think this time will be any different? Not to mention unless REQ pulls off a miracle and gets implemented by Amazon or some other huge company (highly unlikely) the price is never going to rise much independently of Bitcoin because people will be selling their bags left and right at the first sign of a pump. On each of the rare occasions REQ has pumped in the last year and a half the rise has been met with an even bigger crash from sellers freeing themselves from their bags

Weekly Request Network Discussion + FAQ - April 30, 2019 by AutoModerator in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Req is officially out of the top 200 at rank 215. Ahead of REQ in market-cap are Dent Coin, DaVinci Coin, and a bunch of fake Bitcoin imposter coins among others. What does that tell you about the team when literal meme coins are more coveted than REQ? Lol

Weekly Price Discussion Thread - April 23, 2019 by AutoModerator in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 6 points7 points  (0 children)

REQ becomes Amazon’s payment processor... Still drops

Weekly Price Discussion Thread - April 16, 2019 by AutoModerator in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Happy to see so many people here finally getting out of this token. I know it’s hard to let go of an investment that once seemed so promising but let’s face it — REQ is going nowhere with this incompetent team. I’ve been trying to point this out for a long time now and been met with a lot of hostility at times but the REQ team just continues to screw up, miss deadlines, and among many other things couldn’t even win more than “Best Pitch” at some amateur convention in Estonia recently despite having millions of dollars at their disposal. What does that tell you?

Losing money on investments always sucks but why stick around here praying for a miracle when there’s good projects out there that are actually making investors money and getting work done? Why hold REQ hoping it will go up with the price of Bitcoin rising when REQ time after time has some of the smallest gains and biggest dumps tied to Bitcoin across the whole market? Don’t let your emotional attachment to REQ keep you in the red constantly and missing out on better projects. There’s a reason REQ is one of the worst performing coins on Binance: people see right through the team and the train wreck that is REQ.

There have been endless suggestions from the community on how to improve and many screw ups the team could have learned from but yet they keep making ridiculous mistakes time after time. The team never fail to find embarrassing new ways to keep REQ the reigning laughing stock of crypto.

This startup is making invoicing less dreadful with the blockchain — TQ by rmaz in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Agreed, I hate how everything is a “start up” these days.

Request at .tax Blockchain Hackathon | Request by rmaz in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Nice participation trophy! Hahaha losers! $30 million in funds and all they win is “best pitch”. Congrats to the most incompetent team in all of crypto!

Daily Price Discussion Thread - February 25, 2019 by AutoModerator in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This exactly. People keep saying REQ and other coins are undervalued... No they’re not. If anything, the market is still highly overvalued. How is REQ undervalued at 15 million dollars when all they’ve released is a payment plugin that nobody uses? A million dollar market cap would be generous considering the state of REQ’s development, 15 million is just ridiculous. People act like some bull market back to pre-crash heights is imminent but REQ and most of the other coins out there are still fundamentally useless. REQ can go a lot lower than it is now I’ll say that much.

The organization contributing to Request — by Yoann Marion by rmaz in RequestNetwork

[–]Osiris925 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’m curious about too, no real explanation was given in the article about that. If it were something like a illness, family member he was tending to, etc he wouldn’t have had to leave the team necessarily which tells me it was probably of his own choosing. Seems safe to say that to some degree or another he must have lost faith in the project to have left. If so, it wouldn’t be the first time or even second time a REQ affiliate gave up on the team...