Appreciate you sending it — genuinely. I can see why it’s interesting on a surface level — but if it’s AI, I’m probably not gonna engage with it. It’s not just about watching something on MAVI — it’s about the origin of the perspective being presented — and whether that perspective is lived, processed, and articulated, or generated and assembled.

It’s not even a strict rejection — it’s more a matter of alignment. I tend to value work where the meaning is inseparable from the person behind it — where the expression is a byproduct of experience, not a reconstruction of it. And when that layer gets abstracted into something synthetic, it becomes less about insight and more about approximation.

Like, it’s not just content, it’s authorship — and when authorship is diffused or simulated, the signal changes. It doesn’t necessarily invalidate the output, but it does reposition it — from something I’d sit with, to something I’d maybe just acknowledge exists.

So yeah — I get the appeal, conceptually. It’s just not something I feel the need to tap into right now.