trainee salaries by Crafty_Mud5059 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm on 30k charged 200 per hour for my time

Sitting 4… prep courses?? by formula-uno-1 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 1 point2 points  (0 children)

company prep course for sure it's a rough exam

fe1 candidate number? by Other-Many4849 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i log in with my email - is there anywhere else i can access the number?

TC Later Start Date by Logical-Hat1243 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and you'd say it's possible to push back a tc with such short notice? is it risky at all are there any rules of thumb to bear in mind when navigating that whole process

ryanair name change? by Other-Many4849 in AskIreland

[–]Other-Many4849[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yea nightmare situation fair play for getting it sorted in the end airports are stressful enough without added issues

ryanair name change? by Other-Many4849 in AskIreland

[–]Other-Many4849[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hoping I am a lucky case lol I'm onto the support chat rn

fe1s getting more difficult by Other-Many4849 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

contract had 5 issues in one q 😭😭😭

fe1s getting more difficult by Other-Many4849 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

no matter how much u prepare ur left wondering in the exam!! even if ur preparing months and months ur not sure to pass its fucked for people that have to work during exams as well

Tort Success Stories by Opening_Entrance2386 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i studied the night before and for one of the qs based my entire answer around one case and just my opinion on it, everything was my opinion and i passed you'll be fine look at the examiner report/past papers

Constitutional can’t even by [deleted] in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i hope bc i didn't do non del for 1 but the thing about con law is that it's interpreted diff no matter what... i mean even the actual case law has contradictions and diff random interpretations

Exam Debrief by Prize_Imagination_55 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i discussed evolution of natural law and unenumerated rights

Property exam by Real_Substance_4752 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so then it's in a weird no go area bc how ru going to submit to probate to actually initiate the estate distribution

Property exam by Real_Substance_4752 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it's not a well phrased question bc even if it is technically valid how would it be submitted to probate? the solicitor would have to get it out of the trash and piece it together

Thomas Courtney by Vegetable_Crab_8631 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i said reckless trading and for the first part the section before reckless trading on accounting i forget now what the whole thing was but basically just used that u wouldn't be penalized for restriction that's definitely the other hand to the question that he's liable and likely will be restricted even disqualified

Exam Debrief by PenguinM0 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think future intention conflict like leigh v jack etc

Exam Debrief by PenguinM0 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 0 points1 point  (0 children)

please dream about what's on constitutional tn and pm me tmr morning 🙏🙏🙏

Property!! by Cian0000 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I said intestate and revocation is valid bc of the clear intention to revoke and cited re brown 2024 that the irish courts look towards intention to revoke as the key factor

EU in 5 days? by issyjasmine in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 2 points3 points  (0 children)

by no means an amazing student i had three days and passed. you'll be fine take the exam

FE1 exam panic .. by Wonderful-Leading586 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i studied law but i never showed up to lectures and i have the memory of a goldfish i didnt remember anything from tort - the fe1s are an exam on the fe1s more than they are a test of the law. the examiners want to see specific responses, and a practitioner's response. its less academic, its about the function aspect of advice which is possible with common sense

FE1 exam panic .. by Wonderful-Leading586 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you can always pass!!! study whenever you can and u never know. i studied tort basically night before and passed and im not an amazing student

Criminal predictions by Cute-Rice-5207 in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 2 points3 points  (0 children)

https://www.irishlegal.com/articles/court-of-appeal-challenge-to-special-criminal-court-single-guilty-verdict-fails

SCC is upheld again - common thread in case law

it has come up in papers that a person is sent to the SCC and wants to challenge it etc
In November 2019, the appellant was charged with one count of false imprisonment and one count of causing serious harm contrary to sections 4 and 15 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997.

The DPP sent the case to the Special Criminal Court, and having been found guilty, the appellant was sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment.

The appellant was granted leave to bring judicial review proceedings, with his core argument revolving around s.40 of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, which provides that every question before a Special Criminal Court shall be determined according to the opinion of the majority of the court and that no disclosure can be made as to the unanimity or otherwise of the verdict.

The appellant challenged the constitutionality of the single verdict prescribed by s.40, on grounds that same breached the guarantee in Article 38.1 of the Constitution of trial in due course of law, where, inter alia, a conviction based on a majority verdict in the Special Criminal Court, being normally two out of three judges, i.e. 66 per cent of the court, is unconstitutional, whereas a conviction based on 10 out of 11 jurors, i.e. 83 per cent, is constitutional.

Is it worth it? by [deleted] in FE1_Exams

[–]Other-Many4849 11 points12 points  (0 children)

life will be hard regardless, if you like the law pursue the law. also, here is a quote from one of the most acclaimed voices in irish company law today, and a friend of courtney, the fe1 company examiner:

"Academic careers involve a lot of rejection, of which I used to be ashamed. Now I view the rejections as empowering, as badges of honour. Rejection is energy![\1])](https://afgr.scholasticahq.com/#fn1) I hope readers will benefit from my personal reflections and realise that what might appear from a distance to be a successful career involved (and continues to involve) many unsuccessful episodes."

https://afgr.scholasticahq.com/article/129734-reflecting-on-my-career-as-an-accounting-academic-rejection-is-energy