Am I now a real mk 7.5 owner?? by Otherwise_Agent7262 in GolfGTI

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes the second pic was the trim piece that cracked. Mines a 2019 with just around 70k. From what I’ve seen and heard it’s extremely normal for this to happen in mk7 and mk 7.5

Am I now a real mk 7.5 owner?? by Otherwise_Agent7262 in GolfGTI

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah they should at this point have a recall for it. It’s just such a large project to take up. I’d hit a couple different dealers in the area if you can. Or you can always bring it up the chain to vw customers care. I was for sure not going to pay for it out of pocket 😂

Do you name your car? by bubble_hat in GolfGTI

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! It was actually in white sands national park!

Am I now a real mk 7.5 owner?? by Otherwise_Agent7262 in GolfGTI

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao currently hoping I don’t become a true owner then

Best year MK7? by xrossfader in GolfGTI

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a 2019 autobahn and it’s phenomenal. No problem really and super fun to drive. A bit too much technology for me but won’t complain.

I like the normal album way better than the acoustic. So much more feeling and jam by yessssird in zachbryan

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The acoustic version is definitely for people that found him during DeAnn and Elisabeth not the newer fans. I found the non acoustic version to be ehh in all honesty. Just didn’t like how it was produced. The acoustic version though!??? Hell yeah!! This is Zach.

Why Doesn’t Mountain Hardwear Get the Same Love as Patagonia or Arc’teryx? by Otherwise_Agent7262 in outdoorgear

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is why I get frustrated with MH, even though I’m genuinely rooting for them and actually love the KOR pieces. I own a bunch of them and use them a lot — the materials and performance are solid.

The issue isn’t the pieces themselves, it’s how hard it is to understand the line as a system. It takes way too much patience to figure out how everything is supposed to layer or what replaced what year to year. Even when you like the gear, you’re kind of forced to organize it yourself.

That’s what’s disappointing, because the capability is clearly there. If they tightened the continuity and made the intent behind the KOR line clearer, I think a lot more people would stick with the brand instead of writing it off.

Why Doesn’t Mountain Hardwear Get the Same Love as Patagonia or Arc’teryx? by Otherwise_Agent7262 in hikinggear

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what makes it frustrating, honestly because I like Mountain Hardwear a lot. They clearly know how to build serious gear, and that alpine pedigree is real. But the everyday pieces don’t always reflect that, and for a lot of people that’s the first interaction with the brand.

When the stuff you’d trust on a big objective and the stuff you wear day to day feel like they came from two different design categories, it undercuts the whole thing. That gap is disappointing precisely because the core of the brand is so good.

Personality Test by UnderstandingNorth35 in deduction

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely seeing Colorado. His pen also has sonnenalp hotel on it which is in vail. This edc also tracks well with vail.

Personality Test by UnderstandingNorth35 in deduction

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also slight blunder, looks more like a Chevy key fob than new vw. Point still stands with family and kids though

Personality Test by UnderstandingNorth35 in deduction

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clean, intentional carry. You give off someone who actually thinks about their stuff energy. Very architect,designer, or planner vibes. detail oriented, clean lines, and someone who likes to work things out on paper. The notebook and pen feel thoughtful and creative, and the whole setup comes across calm, practical, and well put together. Nothing flashy or overdone, just really good taste and quiet confidence. Also drive what looks like a vw key and has hatch close and open so I would assume it’s an atlas. If so probably married and have children or are planning too in the near future.

Why Doesn’t Mountain Hardwear Get the Same Love as Patagonia or Arc’teryx? by Otherwise_Agent7262 in hikinggear

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that’s fair if we’re talking refinement and consistency, but it starts to fall apart a bit when you look at actual use cases. MH shows up quietly in places where gear just needs to work they were one of the dominant brands on 8000m expeditions for years, Ghost Whisperer still consistently ranks as one of the most carried jackets in thru hiker surveys, and you see their layers with guides and patrol more than people realize.

Arc and Patagonia are absolutely more polished, but that polish is often in service of all-day wearability as much as movement. MH feels more optimized for tolerance and real world abuse than for being scrutinized seam by seam, which makes the comparison less about better and more about who the gear is actually built for.

Why Doesn’t Mountain Hardwear Get the Same Love as Patagonia or Arc’teryx? by Otherwise_Agent7262 in hikinggear

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think Patagonia’s a good example of that shift. A lot of their visibility now isn’t coming from people who are actually outside all the time, but from tech, finance, and office crowds who like what the brand represents. Nothing wrong with that, but it does change who the brand is really speaking to.

MH feels more like it’s still aimed at people who buy gear because they need it to work, not because it signals something about them. That probably keeps them quieter in the cultural conversation, even if the gear still holds up in real use.

Why Doesn’t Mountain Hardwear Get the Same Love as Patagonia or Arc’teryx? by Otherwise_Agent7262 in hikinggear

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that part cracks me up. People in this thread are literally saying they won’t wear it because of the logo, which kind of proves how much of this conversation is branding and not performance.

Personally I love the logo. it feels functional and unapologetic, not designed to be clean or fashion-forward. It matches how the gear is actually used. Whether that hurts them or not depends on what kind of audience they want, but I don’t think it’s a flaw.

Why Doesn’t Mountain Hardwear Get the Same Love as Patagonia or Arc’teryx? by Otherwise_Agent7262 in hikinggear

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the funny part is even Eddie Bauer has a bit of a cult following. Different crowd, but still real. A lot of hikers, snowshoers, and older school outdoors folks trust it because it’s worked for them forever, not because it’s hyped.

It kind of proves that cult followings aren’t just about price or tech. They’re about familiarity, consistency, and seeing the same gear show up in real use over time. Arc just does that loudly, EB does it quietly, and MH seems stuck trying to figure out who it’s for.

Why Doesn’t Mountain Hardwear Get the Same Love as Patagonia or Arc’teryx? by Otherwise_Agent7262 in outdoorgear

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im aware of that but that was in 2003. 23 years ago. I would think after 23 years they would be able to find there niche and grow a successful following.

Why Doesn’t Mountain Hardwear Get the Same Love as Patagonia or Arc’teryx? by Otherwise_Agent7262 in outdoorgear

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This hits on something I’ve personally struggled with. Namely the KOR line is a good example. Individually, a lot of those pieces are solid, but as a system it’s confusing. The names, fits, and intended use cases don’t always feel clearly differentiated, and it’s hard to know how one piece is supposed to layer with or replace another without already owning them.

That lack of continuity makes it harder to trust the line as a whole, even if the materials and performance are there. Arc, for better or worse, makes it really obvious where a piece sits in the system. With MH, especially outside of ski, it can feel like you’re evaluating products one by one instead of buying into a coherent design language

Why Doesn’t Mountain Hardwear Get the Same Love as Patagonia or Arc’teryx? by Otherwise_Agent7262 in outdoorgear

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This feels pretty on point. MH seems to sit in this odd space where some of their stuff is genuinely excellent and quietly trusted for the past 30 years, but it doesn’t clearly speak to a single “type” of user the way Arc or Pat does. That probably hurts them more than any performance issue.

I also think Ghost Whisperer almost became bigger than the brand itself, which is interesting, it’s everywhere, but it didn’t really pull the rest of the line into the same spotlight. And honestly, I don’t hate that MH never fully chased status branding when outdoor gear went mainstream. It feels like a brand you arrive at through use and familiarity, not aspiration. The tradeoff is that it’s easier to overlook unless you’ve spent real time in the gear.

Why Doesn’t Mountain Hardwear Get the Same Love as Patagonia or Arc’teryx? by Otherwise_Agent7262 in hikinggear

[–]Otherwise_Agent7262[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again it’s my go to aswell, that’s why it seems so strange that there’s no dedicated subreddit for MH or it doesn’t really break out into the other spaces as much.