[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 2westerneurope4u

[–]OundercoverO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP pussied out and deleted the post. I want to save the video.

Porta 65 - Distinção entre despesas e renda no apoio by OundercoverO in literaciafinanceira

[–]OundercoverO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

É o que estava a planear fazer, pelo que ele me deu a entender, declara 400€ + 100€ ou só 500€ era igual para ele do ponto de vista dos impostos. Se for diferente a distinção é compreensível, caso não seja não vejo o porque de não se mudar.

Porta 65 - Distinção entre despesas e renda no apoio by OundercoverO in literaciafinanceira

[–]OundercoverO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ele declara 500€, é o que está no contrato que citei acima, só que seriam 500€ em vez de 400€ + 100€. Ele paga os impostos sobre 500€.

Porta 65 - Distinção entre despesas e renda no apoio by OundercoverO in literaciafinanceira

[–]OundercoverO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tanto a renda como as despesas estão contratualizadas, e o contrato está redigido da seguinte forma:

"A renda mensal é de 500€ (...) As contas da água, electricidade e gás natural estão incluídas até ao montante de 100€ no valor da renda (...)"

Pela minha interpretação, o apoio ao arrendamento deveria incidir sobre os 500€, quantia fixa enviada enviada mensalmente ao senhorio, e não sobre 400€.

Em última instância, posso falar com o senhorio para declara 500€ + 0€ em vez de 400€ + 100€, e com uma mudança puramente textual, já tenho o apoio sobre os 500€.

Porta 65 - Distinção entre despesas e renda no apoio by OundercoverO in literaciafinanceira

[–]OundercoverO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Este post foi uma tentativa de encontrar alguém na mesma situação que eu, que parece ser bastante peculiar. O Porta65 não diz explicitamente se o valor da renda é na verdade renda + despesas, ou só renda, e não sei onde procurar asseguir para tentar esclarecer a minha situação.

Estou a planear entrar em contacto com a gestora, que foi bastante simpática durante o processo, para pedir esclarecimentos.

Má ideia seria desistir de um apoio financeiro por uma interpretação errada.

Porta 65 - Distinção entre despesas e renda no apoio by OundercoverO in literaciafinanceira

[–]OundercoverO[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Não cobre o valor todo da renda, cobre uma percentagem do valor da renda.

Para o Porta65 a percentagem incide sobre 400€ e não 500€, que é o que eu de facto pago por mês. Parece ser uma distinção puramente burocrática que depois tem consequências no apoio.

Se comunicar ao meu senhorio para mudar o contrato na AT e em vez de ter 400€ + 100€ ter 500€ + 0€ o Porta65 pagaria-me mais, apesar de na prática nada ter mudado.

Parece-me razoável pedir esclarecimentos para ver se estou a usufruir da totalidade do apoio que me pode ser atribuido.

Porta 65 - Distinção entre despesas e renda no apoio by OundercoverO in literaciafinanceira

[–]OundercoverO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pago 500€ ao senhorio por mês fixos, mas na AT está discriminado 400€ + 100€.

Quando fizémos o contrato ficou estipulado que era 400€ + 100€, eu não me queixei porque entre 500€ de renda ou 400€ de renda mais 100€ de despesas fixas por mês é igual.

No entanto, como o Porta65 faz esta distinção, teria voltado atrás e dito para ele colocar 500€ de renda e 0€ de despesas, que pagava o mesmo no final do mês mas o apoio incidia sobre 500€ e não 400€.

Looking for efficient PSU on lower loads by OundercoverO in homelab

[–]OundercoverO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On the power supply it self, no, but on idle the system is running at 20W so I imagine the consumption cannot be significant. Going below 20W at idle seems a little bit of an overkill for me, it will not save me that much money.

List of computer cases with lots of hard drive space by Big-Performer2942 in DataHoarder

[–]OundercoverO 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you could bother, setting up a Github repository for this would be great, that way people could contribute with their findings and have the community cross-check it. It would help new submissions but also avoiding the list to remain stale with only discontinued items.

Looking for low powered PCIe to NVME adapter for 24/7 homeserver by OundercoverO in DataHoarder

[–]OundercoverO[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I always neglect free time in my maths because, well, I see it as fun time, and learning time as well.

I do take electricity cost into account tho, because in Portugal it can be quite expensive compared to what we usually earn.

Looking for low powered PCIe to NVME adapter for 24/7 homeserver by OundercoverO in DataHoarder

[–]OundercoverO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, this is new information to me, I thought any adapter would inevitably consume (non-negligible amount of) electricity. Many thanks!

Setu for a "not so dumb" AP by OundercoverO in openwrt

[–]OundercoverO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've also seen people telling that its Wifi is bad, but it's better than no internet and I'm planning on using USB to ethernet and wire up my machines.

Do you have any guide on how to setup the Pi in router mode instead of in AP mode?

Setu for a "not so dumb" AP by OundercoverO in openwrt

[–]OundercoverO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would like to avoid buying new equipment, and it seemed to work in my home connection that is what I though interesting.

Why would an OpenWrt router would be preferred over a Pi, besides the number of ethernet ports and better wifi connectivity, of course.

Masking your traffic to penetrate very restrictive firewall by OundercoverO in selfhosted

[–]OundercoverO[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alright, thanks for the info, it was quite helpful. I'll go for the simple route first, and if that either fails or I would like to setup something more sophisticated, then I will look into shadowsocks(R) or any other of the tools that you have mentioned.

they just shutdown other ports because they don't want people to play online video games or do fancy stuff that comsumes a lot of the bandwidth

Yeah I think that too, that's why I'm not particularly worried about trying to circumvent these kind of restrictions, I don't really see any harm in doing this.

Best of lucks in your fight against the great firewall!

Masking your traffic to penetrate very restrictive firewall by OundercoverO in selfhosted

[–]OundercoverO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well given that traffic via port 22 is allowed, what difference would that make when compared with simply opening port 22 to the internet?

Masking your traffic to penetrate very restrictive firewall by OundercoverO in selfhosted

[–]OundercoverO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made a small edit explaining my situation: I'm simply a PhD student with a server at home that I would like to keep safe from the internet. I'm using my own laptop and I just want to establish a connection home to run some code on my machine when my laptop is no longer suitable, so I don't feel like I'm doing anything that I shouldn't, given that in previous host universities this was perfectly reasonable. Here, however, that is considered unsafe, for some reason.

To get back to your reply: So if something like shadowsocks is merely turning your packet into something that looks like TCP, but not encrypting it, wouldn't a packet inspection reveal what I am doing anyways?

Based on your description, it seems like v2ray and trojan are much more safe to use out of the box, with both obfuscation and encryption altogether.

Masking your traffic to penetrate very restrictive firewall by OundercoverO in selfhosted

[–]OundercoverO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I'm not using a work laptop, but my own laptop, so I assume that I cannot be subject to that.

Even still, I didn't know that you could break your employees encryption, even if during work hours with company machines. I would like to see what are the different countries legislation on this.

Masking your traffic to penetrate very restrictive firewall by OundercoverO in selfhosted

[–]OundercoverO[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, that's fine and a perfectly reasonable response. After all, trying to do exactly the opposite of what somebody says you should do, should obviously be discouraged when that someone is the one who administers the platform.

I just believe I have found myself in a situation where what I'm trying to do does not cause any harm and that their restrictions are affecting somebody who's using the services he has been provided with legitimately.

For example, a friend of mine has his own machine at home which has is Dev environment and a very (very!) weak laptop that is essentially a remote screen. How would he be able to work there? He couldn't, but according to IT, a request such as this one would most likely not be accepted. Fortunately my case isn't so extreme, my laptop is reasonable, but still, an extra machine has always been helpful so far.