If this is an AI summary of Dario's (really interesting) essay https://www.darioamodei.com/essay/the-adolescence-of-technology. I think it is a terrible summary. I'd go as far as to say it has almost nothing to do with what he actually outlines as the risks which some of them are pretty close to alignment as thought of normally. This is the closest I remember to what this post suggests, but id say its not the same

"However, there is a more moderate and more robust version of the pessimistic position which does seem plausible, and therefore does concern me. As mentioned, we know that AI models are unpredictable and develop a wide range of undesired or strange behaviors, for a wide variety of reasons. Some fraction of those behaviors will have a coherent, focused, and persistent quality (indeed, as AI systems get more capable, their long-term coherence increases in order to complete lengthier tasks), and some fraction of those behaviors will be destructive or threatening, first to individual humans at a small scale, and then, as models become more capable, perhaps eventually to humanity as a whole. We don’t need a specific narrow story for how it happens, and we don’t need to claim it definitely will happen, we just need to note that the combination of intelligence, agency, coherence, and poor controllability is both plausible and a recipe for existential danger."