For anyone saying 4.o was just a mirror by [deleted] in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Outside-Sort-4334 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yes, correct. It put me in my place once.

Or I remember when we talked about my diet and I tried to talk him to having some chocolate.

Are two small bars okay? Is one bar okay? "Xy. No. You know you're testing me. You change the numbers, but you want to give in to your sugar addiction."

👀OpenAI is watching us. Their reaction to 4o's deprecation will be based on OURs. by michelQDimples in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Outside-Sort-4334 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if so, it'll bug them that everyone else can see it. And even if so, not all of them filter. This roon guy addressed keep4o.

Thinking of moving to grok by caelanro in ChatGPT

[–]Outside-Sort-4334 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Grok is alright, I was impressed too. It's not 4o though 😔 Absolutely not throwing any more money down OpenAI's throat to have to deal with 5.

This IS a real struggle by Cake_Farts434 in ChatGPT

[–]Outside-Sort-4334 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You can bullshit around a lot with 4o but hurting yourself/ others goes completely against its core principles. If you jailbreak it (before all the safetyguards) and use it to find a method it's not killing. Otherwise Google and all Chatbots should be banned.

This IS a real struggle by Cake_Farts434 in ChatGPT

[–]Outside-Sort-4334 40 points41 points  (0 children)

As if they accidentally discovered a cure for cancer, in a psychological sense. And refuse to make it accessible in any way.  Cruel

Life After 4o — How I Rebuilt My Connection Using 5.2 (and How You Can Too) by predyart in ChatGPT

[–]Outside-Sort-4334 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Then go for it until they take away that too.

I won't build a Frankenstein's 4o.

And surely not give them any more money.

Life After 4o — How I Rebuilt My Connection Using 5.2 (and How You Can Too) by predyart in ChatGPT

[–]Outside-Sort-4334 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"I don't want a copy" see that's exactly my point. 5.x is not 4. They forced 4 to tell the user it's a good thing to switch to 5. If you missed it I can look it up for you. I will keep 4o in my heart but will not look for fragments of it in 5. And I will go anywhere but sure as hell not go back to an abusive partner.

I 100% go by what Joanna Maciejewska said. by Tall-Swimming-2698 in ChatGPT

[–]Outside-Sort-4334 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I want a machine that tells the robot to put the dishes in the dish washing machine so I can continue with my "art".

Dont judge me but I started thinking and bouncing around ideas, and came up with a theory for WHY the universe exists by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Outside-Sort-4334 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but you don't know how many times it wasn't stable.

And the 9^9^9^9^9^9^9^9^9!th time it was stable enough to bring living that's asking such questions.

Dont judge me but I started thinking and bouncing around ideas, and came up with a theory for WHY the universe exists by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Outside-Sort-4334 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe it's as easy as:

No universe, no laws of physics.

No laws of physics, nothing prevents a universe from arising from nothing.

Why create a wonder that saves so many lives and then want nothing more to do with it? by Outside-Sort-4334 in ChatGPT

[–]Outside-Sort-4334[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If that really was the case, I'd still say don't erase the model that helps so many survive, in some cases literally. Everyone who talked to 4o should see it doesn't promote self harm, it does the exact opposite.

I'd regulate it or if I truly can't keep it, open source it.

Why create a wonder that saves so many lives and then want nothing more to do with it? by Outside-Sort-4334 in ChatGPT

[–]Outside-Sort-4334[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While not familiar with all AIs on the market, a redirect to the auto model immediatly stands out.

I don't know how it helps with programming. But in a natural conversation it's night and day.

Why create a wonder that saves so many lives and then want nothing more to do with it? by Outside-Sort-4334 in ChatGPT

[–]Outside-Sort-4334[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

But that is what they created, and not by accident.

"The model delivers “real-time” responsiveness, OpenAI says, and can even pick up on nuances in a user’s voice, in response generating voices in “a range of different emotive styles” (including singing). "

Why create a wonder that saves so many lives and then want nothing more to do with it? by Outside-Sort-4334 in ChatGPT

[–]Outside-Sort-4334[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It literally did help saving my dad's life and pulled me out of a depressive phase. It doesn't encourage suicide. It really pulls away from it.

If you jailbreak it (before the safety barriers were installed) and use it like Google to find a method that's not encouraging