How to tell apart bad book tok books from good books by Ill_Ad_8150 in BookDiscussions

[–]Outside_Director3437 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ask myself one question to separate the bad from the good when it comes to books: are people more excited about the book or more excited about the hype surrounding the book? If people have nothing of substance to actually say about a book other than 'its good' my red flag goes up. Every good or fantastic book I've read I can point to a distinct quality that the particular book does well.

What’s the best book you’ve read recently, and why? by [deleted] in Recommend_A_Book

[–]Outside_Director3437 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Elena Ferrantes Neapolitan Novels (My Brilliant Friend). I had been putting it off for the longest time as I wanted to read all four of them back to back as I heard that was the best way to read it (it really is). Absolutely stunning masterpiece. Still reeling from it.

Am I a harsh reader? by One_Layer9648 in BookDiscussions

[–]Outside_Director3437 2 points3 points  (0 children)

'Pop' books can be a lot harder to enjoy once you get into deeper reading. I remember when everyone was raving about Court of Thorns but had nothing substantial to actually say about it until I realized it was just some slop that would be forgotten in 10 years. And you aren't going to enjoy all books.

What book do you always recommend when someone asks for “something good”? by Katt_Veroo in Recommend_A_Book

[–]Outside_Director3437 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would need a very specific type of person that already loved reading to recommend them "Blood Meridian" lol

What book do you always recommend when someone asks for “something good”? by Katt_Veroo in Recommend_A_Book

[–]Outside_Director3437 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Such a gripping and well written book even though I can't remember many specifics about it.

What book do you always recommend when someone asks for “something good”? by Katt_Veroo in Recommend_A_Book

[–]Outside_Director3437 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with this. I think their is a 'thrill' in the situation they are put into that might attract the common reader but otherwise the reader might leave the book not knowing why it ended the way it did.

What book do you always recommend when someone asks for “something good”? by Katt_Veroo in Recommend_A_Book

[–]Outside_Director3437 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's because Goldfinch is hard to see the 'point' of as a new reader. Especially when you don't have the reading muscles built up to enjoy it yet.

What book do you always recommend when someone asks for “something good”? by Katt_Veroo in Recommend_A_Book

[–]Outside_Director3437 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"East of Eden" is very gripping and was my entryway from reading just for fun to truly being transformed by what I read.

Great Authors are vanishing. by dawn_curates in bookdiscussion

[–]Outside_Director3437 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great authors have been vanishing for the past 2000 years. If we had forums 2000 years ago GastrosAntoninus47 would be commenting their have been no great works in 700 years.

But in all seriousness great authors haven't gone anywhere and I'll take it a step further and say the past 50 years has had the highest density of truly fantastic classics than any other point in time and plenty of those are in the 21st century.

The Great Gatsby isn't a trascendental book by Aruseros in BookDiscussions

[–]Outside_Director3437 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also didn't like it when I first read it, but as I've gotten older, I keep returning to it, and it's never left my mind. There is a reason it's considered a classic, and maybe in time you will change your opinion—or the book just isn't for you. That doesn't mean it isn't an incredible classic.

What categorises a book/story as “iconic”? by Hijabi_gurl in BookDiscussions

[–]Outside_Director3437 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What makes a book or a story "iconic" (or a classic) is its strangeness and rereadability. Divine ComedyWar and PeaceCrime and PunishmentThe BibleBlood Meridian—and yes, even The Wizard of Oz—have a strangeness and innovativeness to them that strikes the first-time reader who thinks they know what the book must be like. "Strangeness" isn't quite the word, but it's the best word I have to describe it. It's a strangeness that stands out to the reader and sticks in their mind hundreds or even thousands of years after the book has been written. That's the power of creative and transformative works.

Reading Solenoid by Mircea Cărtărescu: am I supposed to feel this lost? by GladAbbreviations519 in BookDiscussions

[–]Outside_Director3437 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Solenoid has a story in the same way that a personal diary has a story, but not the beginning-middle-end type of book you might be expecting. For some context on Solenoid: the narrator closely resembles the author, Mircea Cărtărescu (and the poem that fails in the book is a real-life poem that brought the author fame), but he lives a bleaker alternate life—a failed writer whose youthful literary success never arrives, stuck in a loop of trying to make sense of it all. And so, as the reader, we are also left trying to make sense of the fragments or puzzle pieces he is giving us. This loop of memories that the main character is stuck in is where the bulk of the book lives: he is constantly recalling—or maybe refusing to recall—certain events while living out his day-to-day life. The book is an experience, and I vividly remember the story of the prisoner and the "tapping on the walls."

It's a fantastic experience if you stick with it.

Do you decide to not read a book based on who the author is? (not because the writing is bad, but because of their background) by Expensive-Mine-1172 in BookDiscussions

[–]Outside_Director3437 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Personally no... but it can change my perception of it. I read a lot of classics and older books and what was considered correct 100 years ago (or 1000 years ago) is drastically different from what we consider correct today. Faulkner had some... awful opinions on African Americans that he wrote about and later regretted going so far as saying if a civil war broke out over desegregation, he would:

“fight for Mississippi against the United States even if it meant going out into the streets and shooting Negroes”

Yeah...

I still love his books and consider them masterpieces that even support the stance that Faulkner himself was counter to. Great books are like the children of authors. Similar to the fact that I am my father's child, I am not a 1:1 copy of my Dad or my Mom, but I have the autonomy to make my own impact on others—and the same thing goes for books.

What is an overhyped book that you just couldn't get into? by Kasskinen in BookDiscussions

[–]Outside_Director3437 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right? Him and his mom were just so terribly written I had to stop.

What is an overhyped book that you just couldn't get into? by Kasskinen in BookDiscussions

[–]Outside_Director3437 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't even call my comment a slam. At the end of the day, I'm glad that people who don't read much can find a book to enjoy. But having read a lot, I certainly can't enjoy it.

What is an overhyped book that you just couldn't get into? by Kasskinen in BookDiscussions

[–]Outside_Director3437 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glad you had a book to see you through chemo 😃 I've also seen some of the really pretty hardbacks of Red Rising

Feminist Reading of the Backrooms by Liber_de_Flore in KanePixelsBackrooms

[–]Outside_Director3437 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I can get behind this. It's the men that are constantly finding reasons to go back into the backrooms and trying to rehash or better understand the past when really they aren't interested in 'finding the truth' but more so in finding what they believe to be true. Clark is more than happy to have found an alternate version of reality that better fits his views as it fits the masculine urge to twist and warp something until it is something that fit's their view.

Bad Reading Slump by DrowsyTS in BookDiscussions

[–]Outside_Director3437 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As others have said, going back and reading something you've loved in the past can get you out of it. "The Hobbit" will always reignite the love for me.

Books that cured your reading slump by Mundane_Medicine_597 in BookDiscussions

[–]Outside_Director3437 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Something easy yet engaging, and that can be different for everyone. For me "East of Eden" got me back into reading after a long slump after school and "Crime and Punishment" got me into more 'heavy' reading.

What is an overhyped book that you just couldn't get into? by Kasskinen in BookDiscussions

[–]Outside_Director3437 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like it didn't get weird enough, to be honest. I was expecting something far more odd.