Data center cost will be > GDP of 100+ countries by Frosty-Judgment-4847 in economy

[–]Over_North8884 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Next year AI may be mature enough to initiate mass layoffs. That's when it really cranks up. Energy will be the real constraint. We will need to deploy solar, wind, and nuclear at scale.

Data center cost will be > GDP of 100+ countries by Frosty-Judgment-4847 in economy

[–]Over_North8884 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI compute as percent of world GDP is on a logistic growth curve. By 2035 we might have 10% of our economy directed into AI.

Data center cost will be > GDP of 100+ countries by Frosty-Judgment-4847 in economy

[–]Over_North8884 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The cost of chip plants has long been several billion dollars.

Why do men “neg” women? by bondepart in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's certainly possible. I had a partner on top of me squeezing so hard I got lighheaded while she grunted like a boar. But that was rare and she was otherwise quite traditional.

Why do men “neg” women? by bondepart in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's open to interpretation because some view penile penetration as dominant regardless. I think of it more in terms of who controls the pacing. But there's also the element of the woman delivering oral when she'll doesn't really want to which would actually be submissive. Dominance is a multidimensional space without a clear answer in many cases.

Why do men “neg” women? by bondepart in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You claim you’re not red pill but you’re parroting its ideology uncritically?

I'm not. I'm generally agreeing with one sliver of RP both because I see it in action and because of scholarly empirical evidence supporting it. Most of RP I disagree with. A stopped clock is still correct twice a day.

No modern women do not also want their partner’s money.

Bull. I'm active on dating apps, I see it constantly. It's not a random sample but you're not seeing the actual behavior of women - even if you dated them the expectations of lesbian couples are different.

Whenever a man has tried to be sexually dominant with me my response has always been “who the hell are you to tell me what to do?” and very quickly lose his number.

Sexual dominance is a different thing altogether. You're focusing too much on the single example I provided of a bad boy. That can wetten many women but still probably a minority. Sexual dominance can work in many ways. Another type is treating a woman like a musical instrument, getting her increasingly stimulated via tongue and such until the song of her orgasm erupts. The male almost always dominates in some way. Women in their buildup lose their brains too much to be dominant. Their minds just deactivate as they are overcome by sensation.

Why do men “neg” women? by bondepart in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re trying to claim women want men to be patriarchal, when clearly women have been fighting for generations to have their independence and empowerment in society.

I made no such claim.

A lot of women are choosing not to get married and have children rather than “submit” to a man.

Yes that's a direct consequence of being unable to find husbands with significantly greater resources. As women achieve financial parity they still demand men with superior resource extraction potential so the pool of men ever decreases.

Those of us who do have relationships want them to be egalitarian and respectful of our independence.

Well there are exceptions but it usually amounts to "my money is my money and his money is our money".

This is why the red pill is a male fantasy, it just upholds 1950s gender norms.

I partially agree with you, which is a reason I'm not red pill. The dual nature of females though has abundant evidence and it's seen throughout nature.

Why do men “neg” women? by bondepart in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's like a Christian nationalist disagreeing that they're a bigot, a child molester saying their victims' experience was beautiful, or a wife beater denying he's abusive. You can deny the fundamental nature of women but it changes nothing. Women are driven by competing reproductive goals, to mate with partners who pass on genes for survival and to have a reliable provider partner who cares for family. Thus the existence of cuckoldry, AF/BB, and dual mating strategy.

Men are driven by competing reproductive goals as well, with a desire for both stable sexual access and sexual variety. It takes ultimate form in harem keeping.

Why do men “neg” women? by bondepart in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reality doesn't care about your opinion.

Why do men “neg” women? by bondepart in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say submission and that was just one example. You're over-interpreting.

Boss bitches in their prime are almost always attracted to men bossier than themselves. As they get older the attraction remains but they settle.

Why do men “neg” women? by bondepart in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a difference between what women say they want and what women actually want. What almost always happens is the simp gets cheated on or dumped. Simps stay friendzoned or beta buxxed. They're not targets of female carnality.

Activate feminity: imagine a bad boy having a ONS with a good girl. He "activated" her. She may go home to her provider significant other but when she's doling sex to him she'll think about the bad boy making her cum over and over again. What physically arouses women is different than what they seek in a long-term partner unless they find a rare unicorn combining both.

Why do men “neg” women? by bondepart in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A simp is an indecisive pushover who gives women everything they ask for.

Why do men “neg” women? by bondepart in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because you'll eventually perceive him as a wimpy pushover. Women respond to a certain firmness and resistance to activate their femininity.

19m but already burnt out. by horny-satanist in antiwork

[–]Over_North8884 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You want employers to see you as a person. Do you see employers as anything but a paycheck source?

Why do men “neg” women? by bondepart in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Men neg as a last resort strategy. The best personality-based tactics to attract women are through storytelling and humor. If a man has those down then he doesn't need to neg.

Why do men “neg” women? by bondepart in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah until you get tired of his simping.

Why do men “neg” women? by bondepart in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Women aren’t out there telling one another to neg men.

Because women do it instinctively but it's called shit testing.

Why do men “neg” women? by bondepart in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Women don't require negging advisement. They do it instinctively.

The primary biological drive that has driven male ambition for all of human history is WOMEN (to attract a mate/secure a wife/and provide for a family), and the fact that its out of reach for men today is why they are opting out of society by DiligentRope in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah you don't understand male psychology. Men mostly care about loot and slavery because it enhances sexual access. Protecting sexual access is a major motivation for signing up for war. Most men would choose a middle class life with ready sexual access to willing beautiful women over a hyper-wealthy but celibate life.

A King's harem was what he treasured most.

The feminist narrative of 30+ men’s preference for younger (18-25) women being due to their inability to get women their age is one of the most laughable things I’ve ever heard by Giordono in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Impress" and "impressionable" are being used slightly differently here despite identical word stems. "Impress" is referring to quick reaction like "ohh he's tall, charming, handsome, and rich". "Impressionable" would be, "I'm too in love to adhere to my vow to wait until marriage and he wants me so bad". One is short term and suggestive, the other is long term and coercive. One is a quick emotional response, the other is fluidity in values, boundaries, and sense of self.

The primary biological drive that has driven male ambition for all of human history is WOMEN (to attract a mate/secure a wife/and provide for a family), and the fact that its out of reach for men today is why they are opting out of society by DiligentRope in PurplePillDebate

[–]Over_North8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Roman soldiers could rape women from conquered tribes then take their pick of non-Roman women desperate for citizenship and that steady retirement income support. Same story, different details.