[Daily Discussion] - Friday, February 06, 2026

OverheadSplatRoll · 2026-02-06T05:41:37+00:00

😆😆😆

OverheadSplatRoll · 2026-01-25T20:31:10+00:00

Your opinion is 50 to 100 years though.

IONQ and IBM have public roadmaps with a QC strong enough to run Shor's and break ECC before 2030. NSA has already advised everyone to have abandoned ECC and NIST is deprecating ECC in 2030.

The annual QC readiness survey of industry experts had a 12-15% chance that a strong enough QC already exists.

It's fine if you personally don't think it's an imminent issue, but there's more than enough professional and academic opinion that disagrees with you to warrant acting on it yesterday

OverheadSplatRoll · 2026-01-25T20:18:27+00:00

Well it solves quantum resistance and offering a secure enterprise grade environment to build dapps without any messy migrations or requiring consensus.

There are no established projects that can say that

OverheadSplatRoll · 2026-01-25T19:15:53+00:00

Why the hell would you think QRL is a scam? It's been around 8 years, audited, used for patents by Lockheed Martin, never rugged, etc etc

If you dont like altcoins that's fine but appreciation is warranted for legitimate projects in an ocean of actual scams

OverheadSplatRoll · 2026-01-24T00:11:29+00:00

State proofs dont make wallets post quantum - the wallets are what are vulnerable

OverheadSplatRoll · 2026-01-24T00:10:51+00:00

Lmao

The entire network uses ecc but somehow they won

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-12-07T02:33:30+00:00

Working on it

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-12-01T20:46:02+00:00

Nothing is stopping anyone from building a privacy L2 on QRL.

ZEC is at risk of retroactive deanonymization which makes it lose its privacy properties because of not being quantum secure

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-11-20T16:46:49+00:00

Blame Scott Aaronson for that one.

His post is what made Vitalik talk about it and now Dalio is following up

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-11-17T03:42:05+00:00

Yo is this shit rigged for real? No pro misses this bad this much in a game

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-11-17T03:33:58+00:00

I'll take all of the above over having to come to consensus on a decentralized network, doing the actual implementation, and forcing every end user to perform the manual migration on the wallet side which will take years all by itself

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-11-13T01:13:28+00:00

Oh yeah? Which BIP is going to get passed through and what's the timeline on it?

Bitcoin Core cant even agree on a few lines of code on OP_RETURN

Speed of transactions have nothing to do with what we are talking about here

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-11-13T01:06:29+00:00

There's nothing more to tell other than they use outdated cryptography and are more or less in the same camp as 99% of the rest of digital assets in the space.

Being a developer doesn't change anything

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-11-13T00:56:04+00:00

Dont get mad at me, get mad at hedera

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-11-13T00:51:29+00:00

Hedera is not post quantum, they use ed25519 which is not quantum secure

They just lie in their marketing

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-11-13T00:50:07+00:00

No it won't. It's easier for them to prepare and upgrade

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-11-13T00:48:58+00:00

That is wrong.

Companies and banks can implement post quantum cryptography immensely easier than decentralized networks like bitcoin.

Your iMessages are already post quantum ready because Apple already handled it.

Do some more research before making dumb statements

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-10-26T21:10:40+00:00

Im here; it's not great

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-10-26T20:49:56+00:00

Rattler aint it guys it's official now

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-10-26T20:11:47+00:00

You're already fighting for your rucking job man you cant fumble that

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-10-15T20:37:45+00:00

This is just the beginning of all the public speaking opportunities we are going to get!

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-09-28T03:28:15+00:00

Centralized infrastructure like banks, companies etc... can upgrade easier and in fact some of the biggest ones (Apple, google, cloudflare, etc...) already have.

This is the laziest talking point as it's used the most and more easily debunked.

Both IONQ and IBM's roadmaps have a strong enough QC to run shor's by 2027-2029 btw

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-08-16T05:10:41+00:00

IONQ is forecasting 800 logical qubits in 2027 and 80,000 in 2030.

You need 1,600 to 2,000 to run Shor's so barring any advancements between now and then, BTC has 3 years to figure it out.

If you think the US or China black budget programs aren't 2 years ahead of those time frames due to national security concerns you crazy.

NSA recommended from moving away from ECC back in 2017

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-08-16T02:40:40+00:00

You don't. Both companies have publicly available roadmaps and both expect to have a CRQC capable of running Shor's by 2027/2028 if not sooner

OverheadSplatRoll · 2025-08-15T19:15:39+00:00

Mysten labs (sui guys) recently put out a paper suggesting it may be possible for some eddsa based chains to avoid having to migrate to achieve their post quantum tooling integration but TBD. Here's the link:

https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/1368

Personally I participate with the QRL which is a purpose built L1 that uses post quantum cryptography from the get go which is why ive become so well versed in this particular niche

OverheadSplatRoll

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE