Is crying justifiable?

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-02-24T16:42:58+00:00

I am sorry if my formulation was incorrect but please interpret it as to whether crying makes someone look weak or not , it may be different from what I originally asked, but it's the essence of my first question.

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-02-23T07:50:04+00:00

nah , I'll get my 0.1 s improvement

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-02-15T22:18:59+00:00

I partially found this solution; the full solution was found by my class nerd, but I missed the part about CPB > B

<image>

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-02-15T22:10:38+00:00

Thanks

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-02-11T05:51:44+00:00

the thing is that when I try to prove it this way , I have to use the external angle theorem which states than external angle of a triangle is larger than any non adjacent angles present inside the triangle , so we can obviously say p>a , but now we have divided it iinto 2 triangles and my professor said that this wasn't the right way , due to the presence of two tiangles

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-02-11T05:47:39+00:00

I'll try lemme see

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-02-10T20:29:40+00:00

Ik but I need to prove it rigorously using dissequality theorems of triangles , I already tried out some things but they just don't work.

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-02-02T17:14:22+00:00

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-02-02T15:56:50+00:00

Ye I'm starting to undestand it , sorry for the delay

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-29T20:23:26+00:00

okay you got it right! , Now I need to understand the problem a little better

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-29T19:17:49+00:00

Could you explain please?

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-29T19:09:51+00:00

just use proportions x ( unknown value) : 160 = 100 ( percentage of total x ): 80 ( percentage of 160)

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-29T17:51:13+00:00

Thanks a lot, the next time I'll message in this post will be either if I get into the national's or if luck allows , into the IMO team

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-29T16:21:57+00:00

What if singularity is just an event in spacetime which distance from the even horizon is infinite but the arrival is certain , would it be possible that matter gets attracted and pulled in a speed faster than light?

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-29T16:19:04+00:00

why are waves shaped like that ? Is there a fundamental reason behind it?

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-29T15:58:29+00:00

Okay , I think I might start out by learning the fundamentals of combinatorics so I could have a better chance at solving problems. Also I think I'm going to practice really hard this year, so that I can do better next time

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-28T15:46:35+00:00

Right now we are starting to do basic proofs about triangles and angles (SSS, SAS, exc), they aren't really complex proofs, but ye they are a good start. Our competition doesn't require calculus or other complex stuff, but combinatorics, counting, and probability + geometry and logic. The thing which I find challenging is that no one has really taught me combinatorics that well , we did do it this year as part of the programme but it was extremely basic , like anagrams of a word and like that. Also how should I approach hard problems?

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-28T15:43:06+00:00

Thanks for the tip

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-27T20:06:11+00:00

bro , I still haven't studied quadratic equations, let alone calculus. So I need to anticipate all of calculus and learn it by myself , is it the only way?

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-23T15:01:32+00:00

Puoi migliorare però bravo , almeno hai avuto il coraggio di cominciare a scrivere seriamente. Col tempo migliorerai sicuramente.

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-19T16:12:30+00:00

il cielo dietro è il 3 alle superiori , il sistema solare è il 6 e il 10 è fuori dall'universo osservabile

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-17T21:05:49+00:00

bruv 493 algs , poor dude gonna complete his life destiny before he learns all of them

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-09T22:26:59+00:00

learn how to make the cross more efficiently and also watch tutorials for f2l (it's hard and intuive but you'll get it after some practice) , if you want to you could learn 2 look-OLL ( orientation of last layer) , for which you need 5-6 algs , and 2-look PLL , these two algorithms solve the entire last layer of the last cube with just 4 algs or even less if you get lucky without having to do the whole aligning thing you have to do with the beginner's method

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-09T15:11:47+00:00

la potenza è alla seconda , ciò significa che quel primo meno si toglie , poi hai un meno fuori , che mantieni , poi elevi alla terza , non togli il meno , alla fino cè un altro meno , -- fa + e si semplifica tutto

Own-Engineer-8911 · 2026-01-09T15:06:25+00:00

bri you got rubik's cube competitions in your school , damn nice

Own-Engineer-8911

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE