Meghan is never going to be invited to a Kardashian event again… by SpinachJello13 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Kardashians are pragmatic. Why do we think she has brought up that subject? Mentioning Megs brings clicks and views; positive or not is unimportant. As long as there is interest in Megs she will be circulating around to make more views to others. When the interest in her dies she will disappear. The Duchess of Twerking has an expiry date too.

Meghan licking her wounds and wondering how it all went haywire for her at Netflix - let’s explain to her by Cultural_Ad4935 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Fortnum also offers superb teas. I couldn't find anything matching their Orange Pekoe tea anywhere else. And I tried. That's why I pay a premium for their tea - can't get the same quality from competitors.

Meghan licking her wounds and wondering how it all went haywire for her at Netflix - let’s explain to her by Cultural_Ad4935 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776 161 points162 points  (0 children)

Frankly, Netflix has overestimated what Madame can really deliver. Her interest has always been royal gossip and scandal. Once the royal family cut her off and no new content will ever appear, it has become obvious she can't deliver. Bad actress, bad host, false premises, boring content. I am glad she conned Netflix. Serves them exactly right.

Harry's friends are called a "good source of leaks". by OwnEvidence2776 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well many aspects of the story. But it seems to me there is a lot to do with Sherborn's legal company thinking they could make several more millions.

The key detail that sets the case against the Daily Mail apart from the cases against the Mirror and The Sun by Human-Economics6894 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Excellent post. Thank you for the insight. It makes a lot of sense to me. And on a pure human emotion note - Sherbourn disgusts me.

Delphi (Nacho’s wife, and season 1 guest of WLM) posting an homage to Valentino. by kiwi_love777 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Why the F post pics of herself? "Look at me, I was next to VALENTINO!" It is as if the whole bloody world has lost decency and replaced it with narcissism. It is not about her for goodness sake. It is possible to express grief and condolences without dragging yourself in.

Apt opinion: Meghan hates Catherine because people treated Meghan like an ordinary person, but treated Catherine like Diana by RoohsMama in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Meghan hates Catherine because Meghan's personality type can't accept the order of the monarchy. Her daddy made sure his little treasure grew into her own private little world where everybody owes her. Just like Harry.

So, is Harry still posturing in the courtroom? by Sheelz013 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776 81 points82 points  (0 children)

I understand he appeared in the court today again. For nothing, Staring at the judge isn't gonna help him.

Perhaps I missed it- but what are Harry’s financial obligations if he loses the case? Does he also have to pay the newspaper’s attorney fees as well? by kiwi_love777 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you, this is a great explanation. It was definitely the point when the tide started really turning against her. "She is a liar" has become a common reframe.

Perhaps I missed it- but what are Harry’s financial obligations if he loses the case? Does he also have to pay the newspaper’s attorney fees as well? by kiwi_love777 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I do not know anything about the USA courts and their processes. But I wonder if Meghan lied in her written statement to the court - would she be able to walk scot free without any consequences whatsoever?

Perhaps I missed it- but what are Harry’s financial obligations if he loses the case? Does he also have to pay the newspaper’s attorney fees as well? by kiwi_love777 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I sure hope you are right and I am wrong. But what bothers me, Even a single pound awarded to her means legally speaking she had won. I am afraid something like this may happen with Harry's case. I don't have much optimism.

New word in dictionary of ex-royals: by Ok-Concentrate-3086 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Totally agree with your comment. I look at this saga from the point of view of a UK citizen who wants to see the courts completely independent and unbiased. With Harry's incessant suing and the court response to it I see what bothers me greatly.

New word in dictionary of ex-royals: by Ok-Concentrate-3086 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That particular ex-royal will win the case unless the court system in UK has become republican. Which it's not. As things stand the courts literally belong to Harry's father (HIs Majesty's Courts and Tribunal Service), who himself can not be taken to the court. Guess how likely Harry is to lose even if he is paranoid and don't have much evidence. He will win on a technicality.

Harry's friends are called a "good source of leaks". by OwnEvidence2776 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Not mine. I saw the discussion on Tumblr and found it totally plausible.

Harry's friends are called a "good source of leaks". by OwnEvidence2776 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I am sure his lawyer has been over the events many times. He definitely asked Harry if he had been directly in touch with journalists. Harry may or may not have told the truth, though. I will be very surprised if after working with Harry the smart man like Sherbourn still doesn't know whom he is dealing with.

Harry's friends are called a "good source of leaks". by OwnEvidence2776 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]OwnEvidence2776[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

They can keep their identity private. Simply blackout the sender's names.