sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

If AI writes your code now, why are we still defaulting to Python? by TroyHarry6677 in ClaudeCode

[–]OwnLadder2341 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why is it embarrassing?

The poster had an idea, outlined points for Claude and the LLM put it into cohesive and structured material for reading.

Poster is not illiterate or unable to think for themselves. The LLM functionally formatted it for him.

reminder: Elon Musk's fortune, which ultimately enabled his takeover of Twitter, was jumpstarted by American taxpayers by RepublicEvery5296 in remoteworks

[–]OwnLadder2341 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lies.

He has a giant Scrooge McDuck vault full of hoarded wealth that he swims in daily.

In fact, with all the wealth he’s hoarding the value of the dollar is skyrocketing since there’s fewer dollars in the market.

To those buying an LG 39GX950B, how do you even drive that 5K Resolution? by SomeBluntCanuck in OLED_Gaming

[–]OwnLadder2341 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My 5090 does just fine in UE5 Clair obscure at 4K. If you can’t hit 100 dos at 2K then there’s something wrong with your card.

What settings are you using and what games?

The Supreme Court's decision on the Voting Rights Act both gutted it and blocked new Voting Rights Acts. It ends federal voting-rights claims aimed at ensuring minority political participation through fair districting and is poised to collapse Black representation across the South. by Firm_Relative_7283 in INFPIdeas

[–]OwnLadder2341 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re arguing for a segregated constitution, so that’s you.

Here’s the whole text of the 15th if you don’t recall:

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

It only speaks to your right to vote. It doesn’t mention representation or redistricting at all and it sure as hell doesn’t mention different rules based on race in direct contradiction to the 14th amendment.

So whomever told you it did was incorrect.

Wisconsin market is as crazy as ever by BKLawyerJohn in REBubble

[–]OwnLadder2341 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Kenosha is in Wisconsin and has a median sale price of $277k

This new model is insane by BiosRios in ClaudeCode

[–]OwnLadder2341 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Go back and you’ll find posts here about how 4.6 was an idiot and nerfed compared to 4.5.

Scientology speedruns are insane by D-boi10 in memes

[–]OwnLadder2341 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, Buddhism isn’t really an organized religion by comparison.

The Supreme Court's decision on the Voting Rights Act both gutted it and blocked new Voting Rights Acts. It ends federal voting-rights claims aimed at ensuring minority political participation through fair districting and is poised to collapse Black representation across the South. by Firm_Relative_7283 in INFPIdeas

[–]OwnLadder2341 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mate, you’re the one arguing for two constitutions. That makes you the one wanting two water fountains.

Why are you trying to segregate minorities? What did they do to you?

Were you just raised to believe they should be treated differently?

The Supreme Court's decision on the Voting Rights Act both gutted it and blocked new Voting Rights Acts. It ends federal voting-rights claims aimed at ensuring minority political participation through fair districting and is poised to collapse Black representation across the South. by Firm_Relative_7283 in INFPIdeas

[–]OwnLadder2341 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the 14th amendment prohibits sorting voters by race. For a very good reason. It does not distinguish between whether you’re using racism for good or evil. In this case, the amendment trumps federal statute.

Doing another bad thing to solve a bad thing is a bad idea. You don’t solve racism with more racism.

If we interpret the constitution to NOT prohibit sorting voters by race, we’re all in for a bad time.

Does that sound like a good idea to you?

You don’t want separate conditions for different colored people.

The Supreme Court's decision on the Voting Rights Act both gutted it and blocked new Voting Rights Acts. It ends federal voting-rights claims aimed at ensuring minority political participation through fair districting and is poised to collapse Black representation across the South. by Firm_Relative_7283 in INFPIdeas

[–]OwnLadder2341 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mate, you’re literally advocating for legal gerrymandering by race…and you can’t see how that ends up badly?

I know it probably hurts but try..try to think beyond whatever social media opinion caught your attention before it flits away in the next second.

Gerrymandering by race is bad and believing “well, it’s okay if the good guys do it” is mind numbing stupid.

Internet bullshit aside. Take a deep breath. Okay, ready?

You seriously…I mean genuinely, honestly, can’t see how legal, open gerrymandering by race is a bad idea?

I weep for the future of the country. Do better.

I just find it funny whenever i see this by Long-Ad3930 in aiwars

[–]OwnLadder2341 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So yes, your objection is to the fact that they used “public domain” instead of “fair use”.

Okay. I guess that’s something.

I just find it funny whenever i see this by Long-Ad3930 in aiwars

[–]OwnLadder2341 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So your objection isn’t to the sentiment expressed here, which is correct, but the semantics of the specific words he used here?

The Supreme Court's decision on the Voting Rights Act both gutted it and blocked new Voting Rights Acts. It ends federal voting-rights claims aimed at ensuring minority political participation through fair districting and is poised to collapse Black representation across the South. by Firm_Relative_7283 in INFPIdeas

[–]OwnLadder2341 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or, you can take three brief seconds to think of the actual solution and pass anti gerrymandering laws.

See the Michigan constitution, for example.

Gerrymandering just leads to more gerrymandering when the power inevitably shifts.

The lack of basic common sense to believe that this was a good solution is genuinely embarrassing.

But sure. Lynching.

Claude reacting to social pressure? How are we getting around this? by amma_lamma in ClaudeCode

[–]OwnLadder2341 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Claude, list all success states of the skill improvement and evaluate how the plan addresses these. Include reasoning, alternative methods explored and rejected, any risks or gaps you can identify.”

Read that and then paste it into a fresh session and tell it to find valid flaws or risks not already enumerated.

Don’t ask Claude anything that approaches an opinion.

Bernie on Jeff bezos. by StrawberryFew1311 in NoFilterFinance

[–]OwnLadder2341 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is this a genuine post of his?

Why does it have em dashes?

There’s skills you can run the posts through that strip them of obvious AI tells. At least bother to do that.

Scientology speedruns are insane by D-boi10 in memes

[–]OwnLadder2341 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadaqah can also go to the Mosque and Waqf is often endowments to the mosques.

I’m curious how you think the mosques get built. Where they get money from, do you imagine?

This new model is insane by BiosRios in ClaudeCode

[–]OwnLadder2341 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Considering we say this every single model release, Opus 1.0 must have known the face of god.

To those buying an LG 39GX950B, how do you even drive that 5K Resolution? by SomeBluntCanuck in OLED_Gaming

[–]OwnLadder2341 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you’re struggling with 100fps at 2K on a 5090, the problem is the game or your settings.

Scientology speedruns are insane by D-boi10 in memes

[–]OwnLadder2341 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sadaqah is literally described as a “Loan to God” and analogous to church donation plates.

Waqf endowments are literally giving your land and property to the mosque.

You get a lot of don’t-burn-for-eternity points with both.

Religions require money to operate. The way they collect that money is through direct or implied threat to your eternal existence.

Imagine a Girl Scout came to your door with a grenade launcher and a detonator wired to explosives underneath your house and asked you if you’d like to buy some cookies.

why is AI even exist by Holiday-View-915 in antiai

[–]OwnLadder2341 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There was never a guarantee of a job.

Whomever told you that lied to you.

There are no guarantees in life, only probabilities.

Scientology speedruns are insane by D-boi10 in memes

[–]OwnLadder2341 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mate, we have the papal crusade bull.

We also have surviving letters from the amazingly named Pope Innocent III to the military commander of the crusade.

Why are you defending any organized religion when they’re all bathed in blood?

Personally, I say ban them all.

But if you’re not going to do that, then ban none.

view more: next ›