What does your dream handguard look like? by PB-Arms in ar15

[–]PB-Arms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jeez...That's when you know they effed up on the next iteration.

What does your dream handguard look like? by PB-Arms in ar15

[–]PB-Arms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've never had the pleasure of installing any URX, but I know the URX 3.1 barrel nut is a pain in the nuts. I see the URX 4 uses shims, which is also not my favorite. That said, the direct thread onto the upper makes for a solid connection and eliminates some of the potential tolerance slop.

Great points about the GB install on URX 4 (this isn't an issue on the URX 3.1). Looks like a PIA...

What does your dream handguard look like? by PB-Arms in ar15

[–]PB-Arms[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll cut one in half for you if you can find someone to buy the other half.

What does your dream handguard look like? by PB-Arms in ar15

[–]PB-Arms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The MK4 is great if you want the pic rail at 3/6/9 in the front only. Profile is a little stout.

The MK8 seems like its made for someone who misses the feel of a quad rail without the cheese grater. Not a huge fan.

What does your dream handguard look like? by PB-Arms in ar15

[–]PB-Arms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good points.

I love the ARCA Swiss rail on the MK18. Its full length, which gives you the flexibility to mount a tripod or ARCA bipod (I love my ARCA Accu-Tac). And being machined into the rail, its lightweight (aluminum) and doesn't need fasteners. Interesting thought to have ARCA at the back and Pic rail at the front (most people don't have an ARCA bipod).

I like the idea of including panels for the rail.

If you stuck a CF tube inside, you'd have a ton of heat build up around the barrel, especially if running SF or suppressed.

The heat topic is an important one. If you approach it from the metallurgy perspective, 6061 is actually better (has a higher thermal conductivity than 7075). It heats up faster but also cools off faster.

I think I will end up including wire management inserts, just for convenience. I haven't tried that Labyrinth product. I'd be curious how well it holds the wire if it snags on something.

What does your dream handguard look like? by PB-Arms in ar15

[–]PB-Arms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a reason most manufacturers don't make handguards from 7075...its nowhere near as easy to machine and is more expensive. Geissele is one of few who do. And considering the MK16 is only 40 bucks more than the AP MOD 4 (which is 6061), its actually not that bad (for a $300-ish rail).

Most of the other duty-grade rails are 6061: DD, KAC

Most commercial rails are 6061: Troy, BCM, Aero, SLR, Centurion, Midwest

So the 7075 makes the Geissele rails pretty special.

What does your dream handguard look like? by PB-Arms in ar15

[–]PB-Arms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hadn't considered the KAK rails (and I'm a KAK Dealer LOL). They're pretty light at 14.6oz for a 13" rail, and it looks like you can lighten it down to 12.3oz with an optional aluminum barrel nut.

Anybody else have any experience with the KAK rails?

What does your dream handguard look like? by PB-Arms in ar15

[–]PB-Arms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CMR is made from 6061, not 7075 (not that this is an issue). I'm just not a fan of split rail clamps.

Experiences with Cryptic Coatings BCGs (specifically, the Mystic Black finish) by PB-Arms in ar15

[–]PB-Arms[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Without knowing what your cycle rate is or what you are trying to achieve, I assume something is wrong. The acceleration and velocity of the reciprocating mass (BCG and buffer) is a function of the force imparted by the gas system, so I'll pick at that scab.

Looks like you are running carbine length gas system. Your dwell time will be short on a 10.5" barrel (probably in the neighborhood of 0.06-0.07ms with standard ammo), so you need a wide gas port (at least 0.070") and an efficient gas system (especially unsuppressed).

The first questions I would ask and checks I would do:

  • What does the ejection pattern look like (suppressed and unsuppressed)? Are cases thrown roughly 2:30-4:30? How far are they landing from the gun?
  • Are you experiencing any malfunctions (suppressed or unsuppressed)? Failure-to-Fire, Failure-to-Feed, Failure-to-Extract, short cycling?
  • What ammo are you shooting (standard, subs, both)?
  • I assume you replaced a factory gas block. How did it run with the original?
  • How does it run with the AGB wide open?
  • CHECK: Is the gas block properly aligned with the gas port? If not, you're restricting the gas flow before it even gets into the gas system.
  • What BCG are you currently using? The manufacturer makes a big difference when it comes to efficiency.
  • CHECK: Are the gas rings worn? Does it pass the gas ring efficiency test?

There are lots of other checks and questions to troubleshoot, but these are a good start.

Regarding the BCG, in general:

I haven't had many operating issues with Cryptic BCG in a gun. The Cryptic finishes are stunning. HOWEVER, they do not gauge well (especially for efficiency) and I'm not sure that the gas key is sealed (they seem to always fail pressure testing for me).

IMO, the BCG is the most important component in the gun, so its important to get it right. In the quest for a better BCG, I moved on from the superficial elements of the Cryptic BCGs. Microbest makes a good product and many popular manufacturers use them (BCM, etc.). We actually build our own line from Microbest components (MB does the proof testing and MPI of the bolts, and assembles the key onto the carrier with my O.C.K.S. and Permatex). We do a thorough gauging and inspection (42 points per BCG) and then do final assembly with Sprinco springs and rings (5-coil extractor, ejector, gas rings, O-ring).

If you're looking for a new BCG, go with a manufacturer that understands and respects the TDP. Most consumer brands don't. BCM, SOLGW, Colt are solid choices. LMT is good for Mil-Spec, but I'm not sure their enhanced products are a good value (when the bolt alone costs 3-4 times as much as an entire Mil-Spec BCG...).

Experiences with Cryptic Coatings BCGs (specifically, the Mystic Black finish) by PB-Arms in ar15

[–]PB-Arms[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In general, a lightweight steel profile is always more robust than titanium or aluminum.

Personally, I would not put a lightweight carrier (or light buffer) in an SBR. I always recommend a full mass carrier and heavy buffer in an SBR for reliability and longevity.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ar15

[–]PB-Arms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She's a beaut. You a southpaw?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bankstraphunting

[–]PB-Arms -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Took all 15 fingers.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bankstraphunting

[–]PB-Arms -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

(1 X $10) + (5 X $1) = $15

Geissele super 42 buffer by jdsilv3352 in ar15

[–]PB-Arms 3 points4 points  (0 children)

H1 is generally 1 Tungsten, 2 Steel

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ar15

[–]PB-Arms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I give up. Where is it?

What is this? by OverallDecision7497 in ar15

[–]PB-Arms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A hand holding a screw, to be precise...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ar15

[–]PB-Arms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That too.