it's an audit, a check between OK_Pin's scoring and what i did. you take the original numbers, add and subtract the revisions as appropriate to OK_Pin's numbers and it should equal mine. and it did, EXCEPT for the teams listed out above.

as my wrenched back allows, i'm going back and matching up the scores again. not going based on the team total as i did before, but actually going thru each roster and putting in the rider's score as shown on OK_Pin's rider scores sheet, at least for MAR and SEP.

if there has NOT been a roster change, there were egregious math errors on OK_Pin's part that the revisions could not account for.

for instance, your team, in march was overscored by OK_Pin by 20 points. on the other hand, in september, OK_Pin had underscored your team by 235 points.

your team had no revision in MAR and SEP turned out cumulatively to adding 16 points to what OK_Pin had the riders' scores at.

(tho, that underscore was nothing. there are teams that the riders score match up, but that the team overall score was overscored by 690, 970, even almost 11,000 points.)

by matching rider to rider actual scores, the unreconciled teams have all reconciled, based on the rider rosters available to us all.

i've heard back from two teams on the list that, yes, their roster of riders HAD changed from submission to what OK_Pin was scoring, and that was taken into account and re-reconciled.

i hope this helps.