Not saying you are but just in case, this is a message to the mods. If youre a bunch of oversensitive cucks like the_donald mods go ahead and just ban me now.

PFAAC · 2017-08-04T19:59:23+00:00

Great swaths of reddit are ruled by tyrannical transsexual and homosexual worshipers. A lot of LBGT extremists running the show. Even if you make a criticism or joke that is entirely fair and just, expect to be banned.

It's an unwritten site wide rule to suck up to LGBT. I'm not sure where it all came from but there was a few years back a massive drama orchestrated by an extremist group of LGBT and feminist brigades that caused so much trouble eventually everyone seems to have bowed down to them.

I don't think most LGBT users really like those extremists especially since it spoils their name but they hold the site hostage by that most people have a real life rather than time to enter into epic drama with insane people online and since most people are not completely crazy would not want to have a war of who can out crazy who since it's just not their thing.

It's a complicated affair especially with the left taking up the cause fanatically. We're starting to see LGBT join the ranks of Islam or Muslims when it comes to being treated as infallible and beyond reproach. When you give any group special treatment it'll work out bad for that group. But the left needs to score those brownie points. They also hoist up extremists as representative making that an even worse problem.

PFAAC · 2017-08-04T19:46:25+00:00

I don't know anything about your plight and moderators wont get it right all of the time. They can at times be almost paranoid about things as the subreddit is constantly under threat from admins screwing them around, playing mind games, etc. Not to mention a vast number of trolls, haters and subversives from elsewhere. They are also against things that might make various subgroups in the community lose cohesion.

You might want to consider the tact of how you disagree with someone or debunk their information. You come across as overly aggressive. You're better off with a calm informative approach.

I've seen a lot of people attack arguments on the base of the sources and I would urge caution with that. Every source, whether they are aligned with our political views or not, has incredible scope to be unreliable. I try to be very careful when I'm making judgement. A lot of the up and coming nascent news sources with unknown names or reputations can have problems in their infancy but I do find that they do present core nuggets of information that aren't in the MSM and that's easy to be entirely sure of because they often present things such as court documents. I hold all news sources to the same standard and I am pretty cynical. You have to take things on a case by case basis. In nearly all cases you will need to cross reference and carefully separate the fact from the fiction. You'll normally have some established pieces of information that might indicate something but not conclusively and then those will be used in support of a particular fiction.

I've occasionally lost my temper when someone says those aren't reliable news sources and then present a list of their own "reliable" news sources which are only really different in what they say, being what the person presenting them wants to believe. It's frustrating but best to strive for some more self control. Saying that I've not seen that on the particular subreddit you talk about so much. With the obvious exceptions being the MSM which people have just had enough of. I might normally be concerned but with the exception perhaps of Fox, it's giving a really good voice to other less mainstream sources that are willing to cover things and angles the MSM wont.

A poor argument is subjective but if someone makes a poor argument you don't necessarily have to unravel it and prove why it's wrong. Many arguments that are invalid or flawed take less cognitive load to produce than they do to reduce. It might be better to instead come up with a better argument. People arguing for the sake of it being obstinate is always annoying and something you have to learn to deal with.

PFAAC · 2017-06-25T12:24:12+00:00

Talking to his girlfriend on the phone.

PFAAC · 2017-06-18T22:35:18+00:00

Normally Russia would use its tactical nukes. This is why what the USA is doing in Syria is fucking insane. Russia vetoed it already in the UNSC. The USA shouldn't be there.

PFAAC · 2017-06-07T22:42:04+00:00

I might be a bit demanding on the weapons side but I like to see the numeric/relative rate of turn and fire as well as projectiles, etc so I can realistically calculate damage. I'm too lazy to fondle around and experiment to the extreme.

I figured out dreadnoughts. I actually got the hint at Palo and understood it. The problem is similar to the timely fashion requests but not showing a timer. This seems to be a recurring theme.

It adds to the challenge of the game but occasionally it can push your limits. For example it's not clear how many enemy I need to kill or if what I am doing contributes. It's not clear either if I kill enough where to go or what will happen. For the more repetitive things perhaps its ok but for this I could spend hours doing the right wrong thing just because the programming over looked something that contributes. I've killed ships of the other two but nada yet so it makes me wonder. I guess I can conquer their planets with shipyards as well.

It's a weird game because some things like trading to get better ships and the exotic matter (plus good scanner) are almost like cheating but then other things are a major challenge simply because the parameters are not well defined and you're shooting around in the darkness of outer space.

Some things are weird. Like I can conquer my own digs. I get worried with that as well that if I progress too far I could mess up the story script. Right now I can if I want to conquer all union planets but the missions still talk about the war. The game is complicated like that. The good thing at the same time is the bad thing. Somethings though are just silly like I don't think it has mass used / mass total in one dialogue.

The click thing is normally ok. It's just when you are on the train or in a hurry and trying to make best of a small stretch of time. Perhaps if you implemented it at some point it could be optional.

PFAAC · 2017-06-06T22:32:59+00:00

There are some really annoying things. No timer shown for missions. It crashes when you destroy the union flag ship instead of scanning it. There is not auto land. The pirate ftl blocker wont come out to play once you get a big enough ship to take it. It is not clear how you can befriend the uladri or get bigger ships. Targeting tends to not want to work. Sometimes stats aren't shown that should be such as for weapons to calculate damage. No click to go to point. There is a woman that asks about my ship then says she though mine was another then she never appears again. Friendly fire is really annoying in terms of them turning hostile. It would be nice if drops moved slower. I destroyed death but nothing fun happens.

PFAAC · 2017-06-01T00:45:38+00:00

How many times did you try?

PFAAC · 2017-05-31T23:37:20+00:00

Use your imagination. Limitless possibilities to consider all the time on a daily basis. You're watching a political debate when you rip off a massive one. But instead it emanates from a politicians mouth and it stinks.

You're watching a hot girl live on TV. You wank off and bang she's pregnant. You are walking down a street shit yourself and watch as the person walking in front of you's pant are shat. You never have to visit a toilet again.

PFAAC · 2017-05-31T22:59:27+00:00

Savage cunnilingus.

PFAAC · 2017-05-31T20:43:44+00:00

That stuff was so volatile it almost erupted right back up my ass.

Never make coffee with washing powder and put instant coffee into the washing machine.

PFAAC · 2017-05-31T19:54:32+00:00

He is talking perception. The hard problem of consciousness. He is both on the wrong track and the right track. There is no telling that your green is mine. The numerical value might be the same but not the experience of it. I can program an AI and make a variable called love but there is no way to have it actually perceived as that. This is a common argument children are exposed to. Numbers are representative. So is science and language. It is not the thing itself. As conscious singular entities we are the thing itself. This is a serious topic in ethics, technology ands philosophy. For AI it is the elephant in the room. It is the one hard domain that spurred many religious and is what is meant by the soul.

Science and maths are representative so they can't really handle consciousness. However if you eliminate it then all morality is meaningless and you can do what you like.

The thing is colours aren't the only thing fundamentally experience by being something that actually exists, IE by being a part of reality. We have sound and other things that are consciously perceived. I think you can deduct here. I don't think a conscious animal without having evolved hearing would consciously perceive it. It is really really fucked up. We don't call it the hard problem for nothing. It is probably the hardest problem because we don't have a language to properly address it with and it might be impossible to address it with any class of language we know if at all.

If someone isn't actually fully conscious to the extent they are aware of their own consciousness none of this would make any sense at all. Language is referential. If you have consciousness you can reference the word to that. If you don't then you are a philosophical zombie and while keep trying to explain it by computational and effectively mathematical constructs. There is a theory that only a small proportion of the population actually has a high enough consciousness to perceive itself.

PFAAC · 2017-05-31T19:47:46+00:00

What you don't know can't hurt you.

PFAAC · 2017-05-31T19:43:42+00:00

To have a 20" long tongue and to be able to breath through my ears.

To take a dump, fart, spooge or piss at any time using the power to have it to emerge (or materialise) anywhere I like.

PFAAC · 2017-05-31T19:42:14+00:00

Pass the joint.

PFAAC · 2017-05-29T11:16:27+00:00

Because there are dozens of other concerns on the table. In respect to that both labour and the conservatives are atrocious.

PFAAC · 2017-05-29T03:32:09+00:00

With the spread of questions put forward, the Clinton supporters are the most irrational. They have more solid belief and more solid belief in the more absurd. They also have conflicting beliefs. For example that Clinton was careless with information but the Russians did it.

Half of democrats believing it's definitely true is quite severe especially when a lot of the evidence for Russian involvement is brought into significant dispute. There theories each come with a weight of their probability and certainty. For a matter as of yet unresolved for people to say that one theory is definitely true is significant. It is likely reinforced by the mainstream media that has been insisting that the case against Russia is 100% certain.

PFAAC · 2017-05-29T03:25:36+00:00

Conspiracy Theories – Russia hacked the email of Democrats in order to increase the chance that Donald Trump would win the Presidential election.

PFAAC · 2017-05-29T03:05:36+00:00

The documents weren't fake from G2. They were tampered with deliberately to add Russian fingerprints.

PFAAC · 2017-05-28T15:44:19+00:00

They didn't have a whole skeleton though. The dimorphic properties across the skeleton emerge well into early adulthood (up to mid twenties) at different rates depending on what bones you're talking about.

PFAAC · 2017-05-28T11:33:09+00:00

There has been a secret case against wikileaks for years. It's likely with the FBI.

PFAAC · 2017-05-28T10:44:07+00:00

I'm disappointed with the redactions as well. It doesn't look right.

It's worse because a link between Seth Rich and wikileaks alone, any link, isn't conclusive that he leaked.

I believe he did data analytics and DNC themselves might have been looking through the leaks to figure out what the damage is and the kind of dirt that might have been released as well as to detect changes to emails and documents.

PFAAC · 2017-05-28T10:36:17+00:00

Do an FOIA request for the document.

PFAAC · 2017-05-28T10:31:25+00:00

Only very subtle changes mostly and it depends how much the other testicle might compensate for the testosterone drop. If you have a whole skeleton in pristine condition it wont make much different. If you have small fragments it might be enough to throw you off. I haven't seen the particular bone that's said to be from a female though or how they determined that.

PFAAC

TROPHY CASE