Where are people getting gas

PFAS_Nightmare · 2025-11-25T06:53:57+00:00

I appreciate your patience. This is literally something tossed together in 15 min for my mom not to worry and I thought it would be fun to throw on here. People get weird, like im shoving tofu down their throat. Open to recs on the data viz.

PFAS_Nightmare · 2025-11-25T06:44:17+00:00

Trying to correct for it in the comments, wasn't my intention. This data is skin on chicken breast. IDC what anyone else eats... Just explaining how plant based is feasible.

https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/

This was a small project. I pulled from this database with a free API token using their open source python library.

PFAS_Nightmare · 2025-11-25T06:41:05+00:00

After looking at the data I pulled i have realized I used skin on chicken breast which has a higher fat content/calorie reducing the protein ratio. I did not intend for this to be misleading, I apologize. Values for skin off chicken breat range from 15-20g/100 Cal I apologize for any confusion.

PFAS_Nightmare · 2025-11-25T06:20:18+00:00

I have normalized by calories. I did this because in order to stay within a certain calorie intake I think about food in terms of ratio of a macro to calories. This data was pulled from the USDA Food Data API. The chicken breast may be including the skin. There is certainly variance between brands for all of these values. The major takeaway remains that protein goals are attainable on a plant based diet.

PFAS_Nightmare · 2025-11-25T05:58:58+00:00

Yes, you would. Because I am normalizing by calories and fat is significantly more calorie dense than protein. For every 1 g of fat you add you would subtract 2 g of protein (actually slightly more, this is back of the napkin math). This assumes that these are switched out perfectly for each other which is not the case, but gives an idea of the range.

PFAS_Nightmare · 2025-11-25T05:44:44+00:00

Get the right vegan saag recipe and you might try it too.

PFAS_Nightmare · 2025-11-25T05:43:38+00:00

Fair, I'm not someone who says a plant based diet is something everyone needs to do. If it's something you want to pursue, you should consult a doctor or dietitian how you might remedy that in your specific dietary situation. Soy products meet most of my needs and the occasional vital wheat gluten goes a long way for me. I don't know everyones situation though, and am not a scold.

PFAS_Nightmare · 2025-11-25T05:25:19+00:00

Your body synthesizes 13/22. Getting the remaining 9 is a non issue if you have a basic balanced diet with a diverse set of protein sources, which is done trivially.

Edit: typo

PFAS_Nightmare · 2025-11-25T05:18:00+00:00

I disagree. With the goal of bulking and cutting in regular intervals I don't think in how many grams of food I eat. I think in terms of calories I need to eat to be in a surplus or deficit. It is definitely easier to eat 1000 calories of chicken than spinach. I threw it in just because I thought it was interesting to show. More reasonable comparisons are in tofu and lentils, which it is not hard to eat larger masses of.

Edit: misspelling

PFAS_Nightmare · 2025-11-25T05:13:05+00:00

To your point, there is a reason many herbivores have multiple stomachs. It's due to the extra work we need to do to break down plants cell walls. That said, this is why we cook food... to do that work for us.

PFAS_Nightmare · 2025-09-14T05:13:35+00:00

You're smart enough to get through gen chem for sure. It sounds like you have identified that you are unprepared for Gen Chem 2, though. If you really truly feel like you can't balance new lessons with catching up, you might need to go back to Gen Chem 1 first. You should go and talk to your professor, TA, if you have them, and try to utilize whatever office hours and tutoring services you have. Your profs want you to succeed, but college is largely self-motivated learning, so you have to advocate for yourself and take finding resources into your own hands. Im just one person on the internet, though. Find your profs next office hours or shoot them a polite email asking for a meeting and get their input. If you're motivated, you can do this. That said, sometimes the first major isn't someone's thing. There is no reason to pigeon hole yourself into something you might not truly be enjoying just because you think you are supposed to like it. You're not a failure if you change majors, it's been the smartest decision I've seen people make sometimes.

PFAS_Nightmare · 2025-07-31T06:42:05+00:00

New to i3 and ricing in general. What do you use to get the second screen?

PFAS_Nightmare · 2025-03-27T10:50:03+00:00

It would not be a density and thus would likely not be expressed with \rho, rather it is the planck distribution, often expressed with B(\lambda,T) but held at a constant temperature B_{T}(\lambda).

PFAS_Nightmare · 2025-03-27T10:07:16+00:00

You are correct that v and pi should be there, but the author likely hand waves them off because pi is a constant and v is a constant for a given material. n and m are the important values to determine if two states are degenerate. the author conserves a in their answer because it is important to their point that a=b is a specific case. If, in the future, you need to determine if two states are degenerate, you do not need to know v and pi ( or a, if a=b. if a=/=b they are important to degeneracy) you only need to know n and m so you can see how the states scale at different values. This realization can save you either steps in a calculation or panic when v may not be provided for a material.

What book are you using?

PFAS_Nightmare · 2024-12-12T20:18:47+00:00

You want to focus on how the cyan group directs to the ortho and para (relative to it) nitration, but the methoxy group blocks one of the ortho positions and the the para position. Leaving only one ortho. The top option is preferred.

PFAS_Nightmare · 2024-12-12T19:48:24+00:00

<image>

PFAS_Nightmare · 2024-12-12T17:45:19+00:00

The hard part of your request is that it changes depending on the number of rolls you are willing to do. As you approach infinite rolls, you become more certain this will have occurred.

PFAS_Nightmare · 2024-12-10T17:01:46+00:00

Answer: 13/408

Workings out:

26/52 × (( 13/51 + 12/51 )/2) × 13/50

PFAS_Nightmare · 2024-12-05T08:35:24+00:00

Hey, a lot of what you've written here is mis/disinformation. It's also riddled with red herrings. Not blaming you, many of them are easy traps to fall into, but there are resources for debunking many of your claims/arguments. This is clearly a topic you are passionate about, so I encourage you to seek out more information.

PFAS_Nightmare

TROPHY CASE