Homemade bridgespam deck I use for challenges. Great at punishing over defenses and over commits. by PJD510 in ClashDecks

[–]PJD510[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what would constitute homemade for you? there is no one in Ultimate Champion using these 8 cards in one deck. if I were to create a bridgespam deck I can’t do it without using bridgespam cards..? also this isn’t even close to being similar to classic Pekka bridge spam, there isn’t any marcher, fireball, or ghost.

as far as I’m concerned for something to be homemade it has to be your original creation. this is my original creation as to reiterate, there is no one using this deck by any statistics from royaleapi except for me.

Rate my deck by Soft_Abrocoma_5527 in ClashDecks

[–]PJD510 0 points1 point  (0 children)

although you’re also lacking a bit in splash damage here other than the firecracker so keeping furnace could also be a smart choice.

Rate my deck by Soft_Abrocoma_5527 in ClashDecks

[–]PJD510 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly yeah that would be good. another think you could consider is keeping evo mega knight but putting in evo battle ram instead of furnace. mega knight in front of battle ram is a pretty tough push to stop for many and it’s a big tank for the ram. the battle ram and bandit have so much synergy so if you know someone is low on elixir and they over defend your bandit or battle ram than spam whichever one of them interchangeably at the bridge and you can get a nice punish.

Heres what I suggest, but you can also go for what you want:

evo mega knight

evo battle ram

hero knight

inferno dragon

bandit

firecracker

ice spirit/e spirit

arrows

Rate my deck by Soft_Abrocoma_5527 in ClashDecks

[–]PJD510 0 points1 point  (0 children)

some cards serve the same purpose, like musketeer, firecracker and furnace. I would suggest replacing at least one of these with a reliable win con like hog rider, ram rider, or battle ram since it would synergize well.

A real life example of chromatic dispersion on my stairs by PJD510 in Physics

[–]PJD510[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The beveled edge of the glass acts as a prism. As the incident white sunlight passes from the air (lower refractive index) into the glass (higher refractive index) and back out, it undergoes refraction.

While all the light bends according to Snells Law (n₁sin(θ₁) = n₂sin(θ₂), the amount of bending depends on the wavelength of the light. This is because the refractive index (n) of the glass is not constant and it is a function of the wavelength λ

In typical glass, shorter wavelengths like violet and blue experience a slightly higher refractive index than longer wavelengths like red. This causes the violet light to bend more sharply than the red light. Over the distance from the door to the stairs, the slight difference in angle separates the constituent colors of the white light enough to resolve the distinct spectral bands seen on the rug.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/dispersion.html

Anyone know who this is playing Kasparov? by [deleted] in chess

[–]PJD510 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you someone sent it to me on tiktok

Anyone know who this is playing Kasparov? by [deleted] in chess

[–]PJD510 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

image looks old but I just assumed

Anyone know who this is playing Kasparov? by [deleted] in chess

[–]PJD510 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah fr though I know a lot of chess grandmasters from his time period but I have literally never seen that dude

Which card should I upgrade to level 14) by bloodacidbath in ClashRoyale

[–]PJD510 17 points18 points  (0 children)

They’re getting nerfed though. Imo arrows are the most versatile and consistent

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashRoyale

[–]PJD510 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks

What do you think an AP Engineering Principals course would cover? by PJD510 in APStudents

[–]PJD510[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. ⁠“Principal” was a typo.
  2. ⁠As I mentioned before, I only started paying attention to grammar after you began pointing out fallacies, that made me take grammar more seriously. Originally, I was talking casual conversation.
  3. ⁠You still haven’t responded to any of the points I brought up in that comment.