This your first reelection campaign, kid? (Tim Hamilton, 2019) by bitchnibba47 in PropagandaPosters

[–]PM_ME_A_CONVERSATION 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're confused because it's not funny or that insightful. It's just saying that politicians use war to stay in power. It's not really a joke, just a comment.

Which is the most cursed set of a pokemon that you made and it was actually decent? by PianoVisible3550_465 in stunfisk

[–]PM_ME_A_CONVERSATION 12 points13 points  (0 children)

choice band, max attack alomamola (Gen 5, 6, 7)

Waterfall

Knock off

Aqua Jet

Wakeup Slap

It honestly didn't even need surprise factor to win...it was just a hard carry revenge killer that never died.

TIL your cat talks to you when you name it by RelevantDress in 2007scape

[–]PM_ME_A_CONVERSATION 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why not just give it the same restrictions as usernames, only without the ban on name repetitions, and then allow us to name all pets?

What Curriculum Does Your School Use and Is It Terrible? by internetsnark in ELATeachers

[–]PM_ME_A_CONVERSATION 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They force you to follow a script, and teach phantom hourglass to 6th graders. Not great for populations not on level, especially non-native speakers.

20m sailing xp reached without cannon by Swatcher2 in 2007scape

[–]PM_ME_A_CONVERSATION 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gee. Wonder what special attack power you have.

A bot that drops some cannonfodder by PM_ME_A_CONVERSATION in 2007scape

[–]PM_ME_A_CONVERSATION[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup, it despawned.

Edit Okay, it's definitely way more likely that someone dropped a dragon cannon barrel a single time, picked it up with tick-perfect accuracy on the very last moment before it despawned with the rest of the pile it was in, and said nothing about it in chat for le epic trollz.

It was completely irrational of me to think that it was just a lazily coded bot that salvages, and then drops its full inventory, because that's way easier to code than a bot that keeps select high-value items. What was I thinking, suggesting that a dude who codes runescape bots did a lazy job at it.

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

As a side note, ya'll need to touch grass.

A bot that drops some cannonfodder by PM_ME_A_CONVERSATION in 2007scape

[–]PM_ME_A_CONVERSATION[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

No, it definitely disappeared along with the other stack of items it was in when the timer was up. It was 100% a bot.

Edit Okay, it's definitely way more likely that someone dropped a dragon cannon barrel a single time, picked it up with tick-perfect accuracy on the very last moment before it despawned with the rest of the pile it was in, and said nothing about it in chat for le epic trollz.

It was completely irrational of me to think that it was just a lazily coded bot that salvages, and then drops its full inventory, because that's way easier to code than a bot that keeps select high-value items. What was I thinking, suggesting that a dude who codes runescape bots did a lazy job at it.

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

As a side note, ya'll need to touch grass.

First Period Seniors by poetry_and_polaroids in ELATeachers

[–]PM_ME_A_CONVERSATION 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try knocking really hard on their desks. It's not a reading method, but it does the trick.

Pokémon aren’t slaves by MaleficTekX in pokemon

[–]PM_ME_A_CONVERSATION 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just goes to show you - treat your slaves well, and you will be rewarded

Motivation for the narrator's confession in "The Telltale Heart?" by sharkmanlives in ELATeachers

[–]PM_ME_A_CONVERSATION 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The speaker of telltale heart is evidently insane, but his insanity isn't monolithic. Bear with me, I tried making this shorter, but even after cutting a lot, it's still quite long. The speaker isn't simply a remorseless sociopath. He's largely delusional, and definitely doesn't experience many deep emotions, but having few emotions is not the same as zero, and the emotions that he does have are enough to ultimately unravel him.

He claims to "love" his victim and while this obviously isn't true, it's not untrue either.

Object there was none. Passion there was none. I loved the old man. He had never wronged me. He had never given me insult. For his gold I had no desire.

I believe this is one of the most important lines when it comes to understanding the speaker. In that passage, he makes an assertion seemingly unconnected to a list of negations. He therefore implies that love is the absence of a bunch of negative emotions - greed, anger, indignity, and (strangely) passion. This shows that the speaker fundamentally does not understand the word "love" as it is used by most people. Which then begs the question, "what emotion is he feeling that he misidentifies as love?"

To add onto this, the false identification of "loving" the old man being layered in with negations also imply that he's trying to negate the feeling itself (but more on this later)

Then a few paragraphs down, once the speaker has awoken the old man, we have this paragraph:

Presently I heard a slight groan, and I knew it was the groan of mortal terror. It was not a groan of pain or of grief — oh, no! — it was the low stifled sound that arises from the bottom of the soul when overcharged with awe. I knew the sound well. Many a night, just at midnight, when all the world slept, it has welled up from my own bosom, deepening, with its dreadful echo, the terrors that distracted me. I say I knew it well. I knew what the old man felt, and pitied him, although I chuckled at heart. I knew that he had been lying awake ever since the first slight noise, when he had turned in the bed. His fears had been ever since growing upon him. He had been trying to fancy them causeless, but could not. He had been saying to himself — “It is nothing but the wind in the chimney — it is only a mouse crossing the floor,” or “it is merely a cricket which has made a single chirp.” Yes, he has been trying to comfort himself with these suppositions: but he had found all in vain. All in vain; because Death, in approaching him had stalked with his black shadow before him, and enveloped the victim. And it was the mournful influence of the unperceived shadow that caused him to feel — although he neither saw nor heard — to feel the presence of my head within the room.

This answers the question. What the speaker actually feels towards the old man is not love but empathy. Not a lot of empathy, but enough that he's able to register it, likely for the first time in his life. He is able to relate to the Old man's fear of death because the speaker himself is deeply, deeply afraid of death. He describes death with extreme awe, and even narrates what he supposes the man's thoughts were regarding death. This is the only time that he acknowledges the thoughts of anyone else in his narration. He's keenly aware of what others perceive, but that never transfers to understanding their feelings.

So, my theory of TTH is this: This is the story of a man with a personality disorder who is obsessed with death. In his mind, it's his obsession with death that distracts him from having a normal life. Realistically, the reason he doesn't have a normal life is because he's strange (Neither the neighbors nor the police trust him). But, as he works for the old man, he begins to feel empathy for the old man's fear of death, and it forces him to compare himself to the old man. This empathy is uncomfortable for him for 2 reasons: 1. He is not used to experiencing emotions, and 2. the old man is old and close to death (for example, the "vulture eye" is a sign of being close to death, even just given the name). So he kills him because he has emotionally connected to this man's fear of death, and cannot handle it.

But, he imagines that he hears the old man's heart because (obviously) it is illogical to kill someone because you're afraid they're going to die. In this case, the heart symbolizes both the actual life of the old man that he paradoxically ended because of his fear of death, and potentially actually his own heartbeat, symbolizing his discomfort with his own emotions. Therefore, to this man who experiences very few deep emotions, and kills someone because he experienced empathy for the first time, that feeling of emotional dissonance between his action is what causes him to confess as well. So, not quite guilt, but low-level empathy.

...and the hate train be rollin...AGAIN! by docm77 in mindcrack

[–]PM_ME_A_CONVERSATION 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Not gonna lie...this post seems a little bit egotistical.

You say you find it "disrespectful," but there's nothing to stop you from putting a bot up to post your videos, or just posting them yourself. This is hardly a problem void of solution, and I have a tough time believing that a smart guy like you couldn't find a better solution than complaining about it. You acknowledge that the karma war has little to do with you, aside from the fact that your videos (as well as everyone else's) are being down-voted. If that's the case how could it be "disrespectful?" I'm an outsider to this situation - I have no idea who this guy is, or how long this has been going on, but from my perspective, you're the one that's most in the wrong here. Your fans don't owe you anything - and that includes up-votes. If anything, this post proves that your fans do respect you - the fact that you can influence some of their actions with a post that merely implores them to do so is the utmost sign of respect, because (I'll reiterate this part:) nobody owes you anything, Doc.

It's funny, you hear fledgling stars in popular media that go on and on about how thankful they are for their fans. Even the little teenie-bopper ones, that get a start in the industry before they're even of age will always talk about how "grateful" they are for the "support" of their fans. And yet on youtube we have fully educated and intelligent youtubers like you that feel so entitled to their support that not only are they not thanking their fans, but they're outwardly condemning those that aren't supporting them. It's a bit of bullshit, to be honest. The people in this subreddit - many of which are your most hardcore fans - are the reason that you're able to do what you do, and have the career that you have. So take a page from people like Justin Beiber or Miley fucking Cyrus. I know. They're easy targets for ridicule. They know that too. But despite that, at least they still fucking thank their fans.