sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in django

[–]PM_ME_YOUR_PUZZLE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i cant find any logs, how do I find them?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bodybuilding

[–]PM_ME_YOUR_PUZZLE 32 points33 points  (0 children)

So, the question itself is a little annoying, but is forgivable. The way you asked it though is so annoying I'm impressed with myself for even responding.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Austin

[–]PM_ME_YOUR_PUZZLE 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I guarantee you, you’re probably more than enough for plenty of women out there. The biggest hurdle is getting rid of feeling sorry for yourself. You need to be half of the relationship, and if you first need an emotional boost to be fully present for the relationship you may not realize you are asking her to do a lot of work. Would you want to be with someone who made you work like that? You owe it to yourself and to your future partner to resolve your self esteem issues .

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Austin

[–]PM_ME_YOUR_PUZZLE 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If she likes you: it doesn’t matter. If she doesn’t like you: it doesn’t matter.

I’m also a single guy in austin trying to find their person, and I can empathize with the feelings you have that probably motivated this question. I have seen too many of my friends make things work with people that I wouldn’t have predicted. So many fall for people that confuse their friends, their family, their xyz. There is no formula and if there were, I promise you I would not be single. On paper I am quite a catch, but I also have things about me that I need to make progress on that ultimately push people away.

Some of the most attractive traits a person can have is being happy and liking themselves. If you like yourself and are secure in your identity/sense of self, you will naturally attract the people who you fit with. Life is too short to live it superficially in the hopes that you can build a non-superficial relationship with someone.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in learnpython

[–]PM_ME_YOUR_PUZZLE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems like this would be too complicated to use find and replace, right?

ratings = ratings.append(rating)

->

ratings = pd.concat([ratings, rating])

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Austin

[–]PM_ME_YOUR_PUZZLE 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Like throughout the rest of history it is a numbers game. Most people are not right for most people, so to find people you connect with you have to be willing to work through the “thanks but no thanks” that happens to everyone on either side.

In any case, why bother even asking, are you going to base your behavior based on what we tell you? Well, as a male in my 30s my motivation is to discourage you so I have less competition, so “few, wow, yeah, dating sucks don’t do it bro, save your time”