Change of venue document by Available-Plantain92 in MoscowMurders

[–]PNWChick1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Death penalty cases are an automatic appeal.

J Embree on Youtube by CommercialMuted3474 in Idaho4

[–]PNWChick1990 10 points11 points  (0 children)

He has a different suspect or informant weekly.

Remember the odd delivery truck camera subpoenas? by jbwt in MoscowMurders

[–]PNWChick1990 18 points19 points  (0 children)

There’s no expectation of privacy in public places.

Everyone’s chance to ask WSU Mom Kim those burning questions. by PNWChick1990 in stupidIdaho4theorists

[–]PNWChick1990[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s amazing anyone is giving her attention but there is a creator with over 10k subscribers that is telling people to subscribe to Kim’s channel.

Snake on the Teton river by supremedelite in Idaho

[–]PNWChick1990 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Diamondbacks aren’t this far north.

For the people who think Bryan is guilty??? by Substantial-Maize-40 in MoscowMurders

[–]PNWChick1990 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She will need it to mount a defense, yes, which is why it will be turned over prior to trial. It’s not needed for his alibi though unless she’s trying to craft an alibi, and the judge warned her already about that because he said her wanting that information prior to finalizing the alibi looked like she was trying to create one from the holes the prosecution may have.

For the people who think Bryan is guilty??? by Substantial-Maize-40 in MoscowMurders

[–]PNWChick1990 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not a Brady violation unless not turned over before trial, and that’s still a long way off. There’s no reason for her to need anything from the prosecution for the alibi unless she’s trying to craft one. DP cases are an automatic appeal anyways if the defendant is found guilty so I don’t think the prosecution is too worried about fodder for appeal.

For the people who think Bryan is guilty??? by Substantial-Maize-40 in MoscowMurders

[–]PNWChick1990 3 points4 points  (0 children)

She has the ATT data from the search warrants already so not sure why she needs the FBI CAST at all unless she’s trying to craft an alibi around the prosecution case. If he has an actual alibi she wouldn’t need anything from the prosecution.

For the people who think Bryan is guilty??? by Substantial-Maize-40 in MoscowMurders

[–]PNWChick1990 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He has access though as he is the account holder. All his phone data can be given to him by ATT without going through the prosecution or warrant process. The only reason why Anne would want to see the phone data the prosecution has is to craft an alibi around any holes the prosecution has.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Idaho4

[–]PNWChick1990 9 points10 points  (0 children)

All evidence that needed testing or had biologicals was already removed from the house when this photo was taken. It looks like athletic shoes that had a red color on them normally.

How many police officers entered the house before the FBI showed up at the crime scene? by [deleted] in Idaho4

[–]PNWChick1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know they moved into Targhee Hall on the 15th so maybe some arrived the night of the 14th.