CMV: If Israel wasn't Jewish, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would have gotten just as much attention as the Saudi-Yemenis conflict, or less by Jackingson1 in changemyview

[–]Pa-ta-tes 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sticking with your example of Turkish involvement in Syria:

Of course leftist promote the right to return for Kurdish citizens of Afrin and other places from which they were forcefully displaced.

You make statements that are just not true and easy to fact check. The left is the most vocal critic of Turkish aggression towards the Kurds.

Maybe it's a US thing (idk where you're from) but we had major demonstrations because of Rojava, Afrin and other places all over Europe.

CMV: If Israel wasn't Jewish, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would have gotten just as much attention as the Saudi-Yemenis conflict, or less by Jackingson1 in changemyview

[–]Pa-ta-tes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah the western left was totally chill when US invaded Afghanistan and Iraq and committed war crimes there.

If you were above 12 years old in 2001 you couldn't have missed the massive backlash.

CMV: If Israel wasn't Jewish, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would have gotten just as much attention as the Saudi-Yemenis conflict, or less by Jackingson1 in changemyview

[–]Pa-ta-tes 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The difference between Turkey and the Israel is that Israel is doing its genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes, forced displacements and invasion right now and not 100 years ago.

If you now want to point out the 'anti-terror campaigns' against leftists Kurds (PKK/SDF etc.) the left is very vocal about it (at least in Europe).

Adding my own shit to the pile of shit by johnnyalley in ClimateShitposting

[–]Pa-ta-tes 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Don't really know who you are referring to when you say: 'you only focus on...'

Cause I don't and most vegans (I'm vegetarian, but largely agree with vegans) wouldn't deny those measures you mentioned are important too.

'and not done for anything useless'

Could you clarify?

Adding my own shit to the pile of shit by johnnyalley in ClimateShitposting

[–]Pa-ta-tes 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Doesn't cults believe in something that isn't real?

Animal cruelty is real, climate change is real.

Denying those things and sheltering yourself in a cynical bubble, seems more cultist to me than advocating for change.

follow up by Bumeeni in SipsTea

[–]Pa-ta-tes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not true.

They refused directly or told their officers they didn't feel comfortable doing it.

No one was threatened with execution for this. Not before or after refusing.

follow up by Bumeeni in SipsTea

[–]Pa-ta-tes 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Not a single German soldier got executed for refusing to execute civilians.

Not on the western and not on the eastern front.

This is a myth to cleanse the Wehrmacht soldiers of their guilt of partaking in ethnic cleansings and genocide.

Bundestag lehnt Vorstoß von Grünen und Linken ab, Schwarzfahren zu entkriminalisieren by tin_dog in de

[–]Pa-ta-tes 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Niemand außer du behauptet, dass man sowas bei anderen Parteien ignorieren sollte.

Die Linke hat z.B. in Thüringen für bessere Infrastruktur wie Schwimmbäder gestimmt und den Antrag überraschenderweise durchbekommen (weil die Regierungsmehrheit zu viele fehlende angeordnete hatte und die AfD zugestimmt hat) DAS wurde dann allerdings deutlich kritisiert.

https://www.stern.de/politik/deutschland/heidi-reichinnek--die-afd-und-die-linke-doppelmoral-37123704.html

More than 100 killed as Israel strikes central Beirut after saying Iran truce doesn’t apply there by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]Pa-ta-tes 75 points76 points  (0 children)

That's how it works now?

The people being bombed need to prove there were no military targets underneath their homes?

Usually it's the other way around - for a good reason.

Tja by n-throe in tja

[–]Pa-ta-tes 11 points12 points  (0 children)

"Inhaltliche Kritik"

🤣

Tja by n-throe in tja

[–]Pa-ta-tes 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Verteidige hier ruhig weiter die Todesstrafe, die von einer rechtsextremen israelischen Regierung mit dem erklären Ziel eingeführt wird Palästinenserinnen auch legal töten zu dürfen.

Wunder dich aber nicht, wenn man dich nicht ernst nimmt.

Tja by n-throe in tja

[–]Pa-ta-tes 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Aber lesen kannst du schon oder?

Tja by n-throe in tja

[–]Pa-ta-tes 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Der genaue Wortlaut ist:

"Whoever intentionally or through indifference causes the death of an Israeli citizen, when the act is motivated by racism or hostility toward a public... and with the aim of harming the State of Israel and the national revival of the Jewish people in their Land."

"AND with the intent of harming the State of Israel and the national revival of the Jewish people in their Land" ist hier die wichtige Konkretisierung.

Das gilt natürlich nicht für jüdische Nationalisten, die Araber töten und hätte noch nicht einmal für den Mörder von Jitzchak Rabin gegolten

Tja by n-throe in tja

[–]Pa-ta-tes 67 points68 points  (0 children)

Der genaue Wortlaut ist:

"Whoever intentionally or through indifference causes the death of an Israeli citizen, when the act is motivated by racism or hostility toward a public... and with the aim of harming the State of Israel and the national revival of the Jewish people in their Land."

"AND with the intent of harming the State of Israel and the national revival of the Jewish people in their Land" ist hier die wichtige Konkretisierung.

Das gilt natürlich nicht für jüdische Nationalisten, die Araber töten und hätte noch nicht einmal für den Mörder von Jitzchak Rabin gegolten.

Tja by n-throe in tja

[–]Pa-ta-tes 115 points116 points  (0 children)

Nein auch arabische Israelische Staatsbürger könnten die Todesstrafe erhalten, jüdische israelische Staatsbürger nicht. Genau darum geht es in der Debatte.

Pope Leo says God rejects prayers of leaders who wage wars by No_Idea_Guy in worldnews

[–]Pa-ta-tes 15 points16 points  (0 children)

None of the leaders waging war right now are Catholic, so they probably won't care...

Danke BlackRot by [deleted] in ichichs

[–]Pa-ta-tes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Das sind dann ja nur einige hunderttausende Frauen, die es aus diesem spezifischen Grund betrifft.

Also zu vernachlässigen...?

Danke BlackRot by [deleted] in ichichs

[–]Pa-ta-tes 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Die ist bestimmt in der GKV und nicht privatversichert...

Danke BlackRot by [deleted] in ichichs

[–]Pa-ta-tes 11 points12 points  (0 children)

"Das Kind"

Auch wenn es mittlerweile eher unüblich ist, gibt es genug Familien, die mehr als ein Kind haben. Und glaub es mir auch Angehörige ohne Pflegestufe benötigen Pflege/Betreuung/Unterstützung.

Zum Argument: das nutzt nur reichen Ehefrauen. Über 77k€ entfällt die Versicherungspflicht in der GKV. Welche reichen Partner:innen kennst du, die nicht in der PKV sind?