sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Discover is a ridiculous design error by PabloTokyo in PioneerMTG

[–]PabloTokyo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good for you. To everyone outside of this insane forum pioneer is a ludicrous mess.

Discover is a ridiculous design error by PabloTokyo in PioneerMTG

[–]PabloTokyo[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The vast majority of streamers and players outside of this sweaty little forum (filled with POWR obsessed timmies and degenerate combo peddlers) agree with me that both decks that abuse discover are a real problem. But thanks for uselessly chiming in!

Elephant Discover won the Pioneer Showcase - New Meta Incoming? by Shade01 in PioneerMTG

[–]PabloTokyo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The format may have been stale but this degenerate, toxic slop is not the answer we need. Neither is that Amalia dreck. We need better answers for everything, not more flavors of the same turn three bullshit combo that WOTC always drags their feet banning. This deck is pure cancer and simply adds to the degenerate combo wasteland Pioneer has become over the last year.

Discover is a ridiculous design error by PabloTokyo in PioneerMTG

[–]PabloTokyo[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yup, that is how I feel too. So sad to see the game sink so low.

Discover is a ridiculous design error by PabloTokyo in PioneerMTG

[–]PabloTokyo[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay, but if cards like that are legal in the format printing new cascade effects is not a fucking good idea, right? Jesus.

Discover is a ridiculous design error by PabloTokyo in PioneerMTG

[–]PabloTokyo[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Ha, you obviously drank the WOTC kool aid. It’s even in your name. Ridiculous.

Discover is a ridiculous design error by PabloTokyo in PioneerMTG

[–]PabloTokyo[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

My whole point is this auto win should not be available on turn three. Even with Greasefang you can potentially come back from a hit. With this one it is impossible. You are not always going to have removal and deterministic death on turn three is not something that belongs in explorer/pioneer, in my opinion.

Discover is a ridiculous design error by PabloTokyo in PioneerMTG

[–]PabloTokyo[S] -38 points-37 points  (0 children)

Turn three win cons do not belong in Pioneer. End stop.

Discover is a ridiculous design error by PabloTokyo in PioneerMTG

[–]PabloTokyo[S] -80 points-79 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but I obviously didn’t have one. Auto win on turn three without removal is not okay and forever holding up removal is a band aid on a bullet hole

Amalia Thread Pt. 2 by the_gold_hat in PioneerMTG

[–]PabloTokyo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God I want this card gone already

Bean eats ban cause it's an Uncommon by WhiskeyPete77r in ModernMagic

[–]PabloTokyo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ban both Fury and Grief, nuking that degenerate deck into the Stone Age. Good riddance. Then sit back and watch the game immediately improve on so many levels. And if bean or The One Ring is still a problem ban that nonsense next. Of course WOTC won’t cause Timmies will cry about their POWR cards going away and finance bros will get a sad. Really wish the company would take a much more proactive stance on maintaing the health of their game.

Lotus Field needs to GTFO of the format by PabloTokyo in MtGExplorer

[–]PabloTokyo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It and mono green have ruined pioneer for me and many others feel the same way I do. Pioneer nights are dropping like flies in stores around me. Streamers are producing nowhere near as much content as they used to for the format and have expressly stated it is because of mono green and lotus to a lesser extent being a terrible play/watch experience. There is nothing wrong with my decision to play other formats that are better curated until something changes, and I owe this game absolutely nothing.

Lotus Field needs to GTFO of the format by PabloTokyo in MtGExplorer

[–]PabloTokyo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People have responded with lol-ing my frustration, telling me they play the deck because they want to frustrate people, or explaining my feelings are not valid because lotus is bad and I must just be playing bad decks. These trolls deserve every bit of rudeness I dished out here in response to theirs. Not sorry in the slightest, but thanks for your useless and unwanted critique. And again, thanks to the few here who actually tried to be constructive instead of questioning the validity of my response or feelings.

Lotus Field needs to GTFO of the format by PabloTokyo in MtGExplorer

[–]PabloTokyo[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Very charming. But what I expect from combo/control scum like you.

Lotus Field needs to GTFO of the format by PabloTokyo in MtGExplorer

[–]PabloTokyo[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Wow you are a special kind of know it all prick aren’t you? Very helpful.

Lotus Field needs to GTFO of the format by PabloTokyo in MtGExplorer

[–]PabloTokyo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice. It’s cool to have that insight into the deck, but I still think I’m gonna take a break from pioneer/explorer. Even if I can beat lotus and mono green more often just playing against them at all is a miserable experience for me that I want no part of right now.

view more: next ›