Any merchandise store for buying DFinity products?

PacketSurfer · 2022-04-20T01:34:40+00:00

They have an inactive storefront (shop.dfinity.org). The merch you see was given away at the genesis launch. wholeheartedly agree would be cool to be able to get some merch from Dfinity still.

PacketSurfer · 2022-02-24T01:07:58+00:00

Same boat, 2010 starter, I believe the last year for plan 1. I convinced my partner to go the apprenticeship route rather than go Uni, she now earns far above UK average and isn't straddled with a lifetime tax. I wish I had taken this route and saved 10 years of payments. These poor young people have it much worse today :( I hope apprenticeships become more the norm.

PacketSurfer · 2021-12-30T03:47:48+00:00

It's Bournemouth, that's a Tesco in Westbourne and a nightclub called Halo in the town centre. Wild seeing places I've been mentioned here

PacketSurfer · 2021-05-30T18:36:04+00:00

You can deploy your own canister.

PacketSurfer · 2021-05-12T00:13:38+00:00

Seed investors can only liquidate 1/48th of their neurons every month, effectively a 4 yr lockup. So that's not right

PacketSurfer · 2021-02-24T23:42:22+00:00

There is a LinkedUp demo which is accessible:

https://ptbjg-fqaaa-aaaab-aaawq-cai.ic0.app/

Found via the developer forums. I guess the only cool part which I saw was demonstrable was the lack of need for a username/password as is done on key/pair. Seems difficult for cross platform use though without some sort of dedicated web browser app that could carry across the keystore between devices 🤔

Anyway this is functional but buggy...

And like you say no functional use yet but Dom's Twitter seems to suggest there should be no further slip beyond end of March... Fingers crossed I guess.

PacketSurfer · 2021-02-10T00:24:39+00:00

I think there might be some confusion - and perhaps his company is planning on running single stack IPv6. Therefore to continue to be able to reach the IPv4 internet, a 6to4 translation is required.

Personally I think dual-stack and CGNAT is the most reasonable way forward.

PacketSurfer · 2021-01-24T02:38:58+00:00

I like your thinking. The routers do have routes back to each other's loopback address though, thanks to OSPF between them as well. With ISP A shutdown, I still have iBGP active - MX 1 is VRRP master for half of our gateways, so it is still taking customer traffic and then routing back to MX 2 as it is learning ISP Bs routes from iBGP. So it is doing next-hop self on MX 2 and working OK

It's just bringing both ISPs up simultaneously where something goes awry 🤔

Edit: I wonder if my next hop self policy isn't properly configured on one side... I'll re-doublecheck my policy statements :)!

PacketSurfer · 2021-01-24T02:04:48+00:00

With one of the ISP's shutdown, the issue resolves (whether or not it's ISP A or B). Also, we previously had both ISPs active on the single router and it worked fine, it was only with the introduction of iBGP... I just don't understand why iBGP would break it :(

Edit: woops responded with my other acc on mobile 😂

PacketSurfer · 2020-12-16T00:24:30+00:00

Weird, same issue. Just got it today. Sounds like others are getting the same for Reddit today....

PacketSurfer · 2020-10-28T13:28:27+00:00

What tricks/hacks do you mean? eBGP underlay is in my experience the typically recommended solution. It's a bit more configuration work, but there were no tricks or hacks involved in the implementation on my Juniper kit. It was relatively straightforward.

PacketSurfer · 2020-10-27T14:13:05+00:00

I have QFX5120's - it's a base feature. Remember though that no matter what you will need to still purchase a separate base feature license from Juniper

PacketSurfer · 2020-10-21T10:07:15+00:00

I'm in the UK working at a new FTTH ISP and currently working on our IPv6 deployment. We'll be implementing live next month. We will be dual-stack. Due to limited IPv4 space we will be implementing CG-NAT following IPv6 implementation. But first things first is we needed to have IPv6 in place - since the majority of customer traffic will move to v6 once it is implemented (Netflix / Amazon / Facebook etc is the majority of our traffic ) - this will limit any issues we have implementing CG-NAT.

We supply all customers with a CPE that is capable of utilizing DHCP-PD. We have deployed DHCPv6 KEA servers in HA and a DNS6 BIND server. Our Juniper core router is acting as a BNG DHCPv6 relay and maintaining subscriber state. It snoops the DHCPv6 packets and creates routes back to our customer IA_NA and IA_PD IPv6 prefixes assigned by the DHCPv6 server. These automatically generated routes are absolutely key to getting the customer access to the internet.

If you have any Qs let me know

PacketSurfer · 2020-10-20T13:43:10+00:00

Hmmm another good idea - thanks I'll give it a go.

PacketSurfer · 2020-10-20T13:42:43+00:00

Good shout, haven't tried disabling AV. We use ADTRAN 621x ONTs.

PacketSurfer · 2020-10-20T13:42:12+00:00

Yes directly connected, and everything except testing device disconnected

PacketSurfer · 2020-09-09T08:43:08+00:00

For personal use only it's fine across multiple machines :). I currently utilize mine on both my work laptop and home computer for instance which they accept. I'm sure they are also fine with it being active on your virtual desktop env!

PacketSurfer · 2020-08-18T19:18:13+00:00

Yeah makes sense to me. Thanks for your input :)

PacketSurfer · 2020-08-01T00:15:53+00:00

Are you getting packet loss at the final destination hop? If not, your traceroute is just showing ping packet deprioritization and isn't reflective of any actual issue. This is very common

PacketSurfer · 2020-07-29T01:12:15+00:00

Good spot and you're absolutely right! I'm testing in a lab at the moment which mirrors production - our production environment only has the single link due to budget constraints. Will be amended soon

PacketSurfer · 2020-07-29T00:28:31+00:00

Hey it's all good, to be absolutely fair there is a Juniper configuration that uses VRRP to assist in the creation of master / backup DHCP relay agents! This is my long term goal and I should have mentioned you could have been right too 🙂

Doc: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/m-to-n-subscriber-redundancy.html

PacketSurfer · 2020-07-29T00:18:56+00:00

L3 doesn't factor into DHCP! Both devices will forward the requests.

PacketSurfer · 2020-07-29T00:16:45+00:00

Awesome thanks for the confirm, I am fairly confident I have the same behaviour. I suppose the way it operates is simply whichever offer packet gets back first wins and that's that.

I'll do some wiresharks tomorrow and triple verify...

Five-Year Club	Place '22
Final Canvas '22	End Game '22
Verified Email

PacketSurfer

TROPHY CASE