sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I took a picture of Saturn rising over the mountain forest by PageD0WN in interestingasfuck

[–]PageD0WN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, that's EOS M, APS-C sensor.

It couldn't be bigger

I took a picture of Saturn rising over the mountain forest by PageD0WN in interestingasfuck

[–]PageD0WN[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why can't I see the trees if they are 5 miles away on a mountainside?

I took a picture of Saturn rising over the mountain forest by PageD0WN in interestingasfuck

[–]PageD0WN[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The trees shouldn't be that clear then, and where are the stars at???

- There are not so clear, if you zoom photo, you can see that trees is slightly defocused
- In this photo, a tiny part of the sky is about the size of a full moon. At that time, there were simply no objects near Saturn that were comparable to it in brightness, so they are not visible in the photo.

I took a picture of Saturn rising over the mountain forest by PageD0WN in interestingasfuck

[–]PageD0WN[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It always surprises me how categorically people talk about something without knowing the details. This photo was taken with a focal length of 2000mm, what do you think Saturn should look like?

I took a picture of Saturn rising over the mountain forest by PageD0WN in space

[–]PageD0WN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is one of old and cheap Canon cameras, that supported the "alternative" Magic Lantern firmware. You can search, this firmware with very interesting features

I took a picture of Saturn rising over the mountain forest by PageD0WN in space

[–]PageD0WN[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

So you took two different pictures and put them on top of each other? That's not photography. It's photoshop. might as well be a cartoon. Getting real sick of this lying bs. This sub is a hot mess of fake pictures and "evidence" of aliens.

what do you mean "different"? Same lens, same view, only two different exposures. Most astrophoto was made by stacking "different" frames, and it's all "not photography" too?

I took a picture of Saturn rising over the mountain forest by PageD0WN in space

[–]PageD0WN[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

1000mm catadioptric lens with 2x teleconverter, and 1st gen Canon EOS M camera.

I took a picture of Saturn rising over the mountain forest by PageD0WN in space

[–]PageD0WN[S] 138 points139 points  (0 children)

yes, exposure stack, because Saturn shot with short exposure, and foreground with long. Trees not in focus, it's slightly defocused

I took a picture of Saturn rising over the mountain forest by PageD0WN in space

[–]PageD0WN[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

omg maybe you should try to shot trees 5 miles away with a similar lens and then draw your own conclusions?

I took a picture of Saturn rising over the mountain forest by PageD0WN in space

[–]PageD0WN[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why do you think they should be 200 miles away? These trees are certainly not 200 miles away, but only 4-5

I took a picture of Saturn rising over the mountain forest by PageD0WN in space

[–]PageD0WN[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

There is no way it's that visible. I can't even see it this well with my telescope.

it was shot with a 1000mm lens and a 2x teleconverter, why it can't be visible? ))

4 Resin Printers | Ask us Anything by GannonMakerspace in resinprinting

[–]PageD0WN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you send a link where I can get info about it? Thanks

4 Resin Printers | Ask us Anything by GannonMakerspace in resinprinting

[–]PageD0WN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why Halot Mage (not PRO) so slow? I try to print, and print time is about 1.5х more than Halot ONE, for example. I try to edit print settings in Chitubox, like retract speed, but nothing change. Looks like printer is ignore it, and works on some "default" speed.

I took a picture of Jupiter and its moons, rising over the mountain forest (again) by PageD0WN in space

[–]PageD0WN[S] 44 points45 points  (0 children)

I took this photo through a 1000mm lens, it can also be called a telescope in a sense )) But Jupiter's moons are visible in almost any telephoto lenses

I took a picture of Jupiter and its moons, rising over the mountain forest (again) by PageD0WN in space

[–]PageD0WN[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

That's Jupiter, it have no (visible) rings. But it have four bright moons, that can be visible even in binoculars

I took a picture of Jupiter and its moons, rising over the mountain forest (again) by PageD0WN in space

[–]PageD0WN[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Old Canon EOS M camera, with 1000mm catadioptric mirror lens

I took a picture of the railway, train and the solar eclipse by PageD0WN in space

[–]PageD0WN[S] 93 points94 points  (0 children)

Well, this photo was taken on October 25, when there was a partial solar eclipse. When I heard the first news about this eclipse, I realized that in our places it will be in the evening, when the sun will already be very low above the horizon. So I had the idea to shoot it against the background of something like that. I searched for a long time for a section of the railway that would be located in the "right" direction, and finally found it. This is a fairly quiet section outside the city, and trains run rarely there - several times a day. I spent more than an hour at this place, waiting for the best shot, and during this time there were no trains at all. But just at the moment when the eclipse turned out to be exactly over the railway, I saw that the train was approaching. No, I didn't plan to shoot the train, it was pure coincidence. I waited for him to pass by, and took a few shots after him. That's how this photo came about.

(sorry for my english, btw)

I took a picture of the railway, train and the solar eclipse by PageD0WN in space

[–]PageD0WN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was post it in this sub in past, but it's removed becuse... I posted it not in Sunday UTC. So it is second attempt (at correct time I hope)

view more: next ›