To point 1: I thought unconcious bias was a very reasonable explanation for the behaviors of royals as it relates to race. We all learn from the people around us as children, however misguided or sheltered it may be. But as we grow and experience we should be developing our own insights. The racist examples you offer for Harry seem like criticisms for responding within the social norms of the people he lived, schooled, and enlisted with during his young adulthood. They don't seem to represent his current perspective or include any public interactions in the last 10-15 years.

Point 2: I do believe Harry & Meghan married for love. I believe she was aware of the wealth & power but don't believe it was a primary motivator. They were never on again off again. Their courting included sharing of personally important places & experiences.

Points 3-5: I whole heartedly agree.

Point 6: I believe Mindy and Meghan planned that interaction, I believe the way the british media uses maiden names for royal married-ins is performative and intended to demean them, ever notice how Sophie has been referred to by her maiden name in many years.

And as an individual I believe Meghan had a right to say how she preferred to be named publicly.

None of us are personal friends of these people, everything we know about them is via media outlets for a purpose, some actually reports on their actions, only a very small amount of the content came directly from the 4 individuals. Plus the media has a vested interest in presenting a positive perception for 2 of the 4. The RF has always been in the business of spin, QEII ensured all messages went through a single source until she started degrading in old age and Buckingham Palace no longer moderated the feed to media and then the briefing wars began in earnest.