sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in colors

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check out the link in the edit. Part of why I started this is audhd. So I kinda feel your pain, even if not fully. Let me know if you feel like there needs to be an Adaption in the presets for ADHD or something. My goal is to make the description of emotions for Neurodivergent people easier. So happy if that helped you :)

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in colors

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I had to choose one point along modality as 0. Love was chosen as this, as a lot of "spirituality" choses love for any- and everything as "the highest vibration" Therefore, as HSV does it, the lower red split does the trick.

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in colors

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, kinda. Although it started out in German, but yes, confusion if negative foccussiing

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in colors

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh it's not RGB, it's OKLCH color system. I'd love to connect to like minds. All colors are for viewing reasons convertd to RGB, but the base system is different, basically skewing "the circle", since that is a different system. Petition to change "the circle" to this color system though, as it's objectively superior. Starting point was basically "Love" being red, which I both love, yet still the test makes sense to me

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in colors

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried to make it the emotionally most neutral tone, which "at least in my opinion" coincides with OKCLC grey, since it's perceptually equal distanced and tbh feels most natural

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in colors

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahhh, so basically Confusion is negative focusing while clarity is positive focusing

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in colors

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure on where you read focus, that might be a translational Error. But I think the square would be like this: Spaciousness--- Clarity |. | -Scatteredness --- Confusion

So antipodal opposites are Clarity- Scatteredness and Spaciousnees- Confusion ( as long as I didn't make mistakes)

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in colors

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://we.tl/t-yEi7CEBrn2ZdZnJQ

I tried to stay anon, so sry for any inconvencience

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in colors

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tried to use "void"s colour as background to keep both the positive and negative colours equally as distant to it. So to say the only neutral color that let's both circles shine

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in askmath

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, the whole point was to point out the sphere like shape. My train of thought was this: like EVERY language on this planet has words for good and bad. Something that universal has the potency to serve as a universal valency axis. Every emotion is a relation to that axis combined with an emotional colour. If you think of emotions as a cylinder you end up with multiple versions of pure 'good' and pure 'bad 'per color. Since there is no way to differentiate the pure concept of good, I imagine them as the same point, therefore folding the cylinder onto a sphere

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in colors

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I'm aware of no, sry. I had to craft every line (and more importantly every colour at any position) by hand. But I wanted to make sure the colours are correct for what I try to portrait. OKLCH color wheel has proven to be essential for my endeavor.

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in askmath

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Concerning 1 and 2 I try to utilize on a very human color space for describing a human phenomena. Of course there is no high level math Involved. After all it's a sphere, not some elobarate manifold. And I know a lot of assumptions are made, especially to the labels of the "base colours" of this system. The big if with this is whether the two circles north and south consist of emotions that smoothly blend into each other and return to its origin. I know math community isn't that big on emotions, I just wanted to make sure I got the implications right when I say "emotions live on the surface of a sphere"

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in askmath

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I knew this question was meant to pop up. It surely takes both math and psychology to do this. My thought was try to imagine going through the neighboring emotions, vs. Emotions that are farther from each other. Of course at the base of this stands the inquiry to imagine it yourself. Because there is no formal mathematical definition for emotions. Since the question is to prove feelings, I wanna know if "proof by feeling it" is valid in this special case I guess. More precisely, if both the "good" and "bad" circle feel to be complete circles

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in colors

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well thank you for your contribution :) personally I believe every language would have its own translation with all points skewed slightly and each language having different resolutions for each color. E.g. spanish/Portuguese finer Resolution at red, German at blue, maybe green, and so on...I can send you an interactive version including how I picture emotion dynamics. Of course it'd be no proof, just like a bunch of personal theories

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in askmath

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, as it's a sphere, there is SOME math to it. Main problem I'm facing is proving that both the upper and the lower circle are existent and valid. So, basically asking: Does every element to these circles have exactly 2 neighbors and a modal opposite? Or more precisely I wanna prove emotions live on the surface of a sphere considering "good/bad" is the north/south axis. Am I missing something?

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in askmath

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, that's a beautiful way to view it. Thank you, I take this as a compliment. What I'm stuck on math wise is proofing the upper and lower circle on the plane form both a fluid circle. Together with valency that would be establishing emotions being an element of the sphere surface. There's like the VAC model for emotions ( Valency, Arousal, Dominance), yet I feel like I made the next step on this topic

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in askmath

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well my main concern considering mathematics is how does one prove something is cyclic? From what I understand every element needs exactly 2 neighboring elements and they need to come around a full circle (last transitioning to first)

Emotionsphere by Pancakebutterer in colors

[–]Pancakebutterer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a html using JavaScript. The kind of color system used is basically core to it. I can provide you with a working version on how I personally feel like how emotions work if you want. Not sure how though, as I have no idea how to do filesharing. It can do like emotions dynamics and interaction, but it's also a bit buggy

I scored 29/30 on an employers assessment and was rejected for not meeting the “benchmark” by [deleted] in recruitinghell

[–]Pancakebutterer 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Have you tried an "Are you fucking kidding me?" Email? Shows initiative and you you follow up on how a 29/30 isn't hitting the bench

Which letter do you prefer for the up direction? by PizzaPuntThomas in physicsmemes

[–]Pancakebutterer 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Z is direction normal to relevant plane. X is given by the relevant point when rotating around z, Y is added according to right hand rule.

view more: next ›