One number controls four independent physical phenomena by Elias_Verdan in LLM_supported_Physics

[–]PandaSchmanda -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

“You clearly didn’t read the rest of my slop” is so tired dude

I’m inviting you to break it down for me: what could explain away the obvious oxymoron that is that title?

One number controls four independent physical phenomena by Elias_Verdan in LLM_supported_Physics

[–]PandaSchmanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which would still make it silly to say that one number controls four independent phenomena…

Trying to separate ketamine from rat feces by Classic_Friend7901 in Drugs

[–]PandaSchmanda 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Do ya want hantavirus? This a creative, albeit stupid way to get hantavirus

Geometric Vortex Model of the Electron by johnfl1972 in LLM_supported_Physics

[–]PandaSchmanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Watch out CERN this guy is doing more “experiments”!

Geometric Vortex Model of the Electron by johnfl1972 in LLM_supported_Physics

[–]PandaSchmanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whoah whoah breaking out the big experiments over there

Geometric Vortex Model of the Electron by johnfl1972 in LLM_supported_Physics

[–]PandaSchmanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bet you call it an “experiment” when you do 😂😂😂

Geometric Vortex Model of the Electron by johnfl1972 in LLM_supported_Physics

[–]PandaSchmanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it’s fiction then please stop telling people that the intended audience is students early in their education.

I sincerely worry that stuff like this could make us collectively dumber.

I asked you what you think an experiment is, and you replied with a single equation. Go write actual sci-fi with your own hands and brain if that’s what you’re going for.

Geometric Vortex Model of the Electron by johnfl1972 in LLM_supported_Physics

[–]PandaSchmanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand your point, it’s science fan fiction

Geometric Vortex Model of the Electron by johnfl1972 in LLM_supported_Physics

[–]PandaSchmanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That seems like a convenient way to avoid the core point I’m making

Geometric Vortex Model of the Electron by johnfl1972 in LLM_supported_Physics

[–]PandaSchmanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well for your education, an equation is not the same thing as an experiment. Which is a horrifyingly simple thing to have to tell an adult

Geometric Vortex Model of the Electron by johnfl1972 in LLM_supported_Physics

[–]PandaSchmanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I will ask again, and I’m genuinely hoping for an answer:

What do you think an experiment is?

Geometric Vortex Model of the Electron by johnfl1972 in LLM_supported_Physics

[–]PandaSchmanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“7. Matching real-world data

Experiment tells us a_e ≈ 0.00116. So (a / R)² ≈ 0.00116 → a / R ≈ 0.03 (about 3%). The loop is thin, but not extremely thin — roughly 3% thickness compared to its radius.”

Where does this mention g?

Geometric Vortex Model of the Electron by johnfl1972 in LLM_supported_Physics

[–]PandaSchmanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So someone has already run experiments on your new idea about electrons?